What YouTube Videos Are You Watching Right Now


I enjoy stuff like this.
Mythology and the stories we tell ourselves shape our reality.

Something in the comments on the book itself which I thought valuable as well:

"Culture is organic. If it does not grow then it slowly perishes. The questioning that trickster figures force us to undertake helps to maintain our cultural vitality. If a reader takes anything away from this book, I hope that they take away this point."
 
"Culture is organic. If it does not grow then it slowly perishes. The questioning that trickster figures force us to undertake helps to maintain our cultural vitality. If a reader takes anything away from this book, I hope that they take away this point."

Yeah, that is a great point. One might even say sacred.
 
Good to know, I'm glad you enjoyed the videos. I'll post similar content in the future then.

Lol well I'm already very familiar with it so don't worry about that.
Post what matters to or interests yourself, of course.
 
 

This was great. I'm glad Long Island Audit posts the court proceedings for the cases his videos cause. It's great follow-up. It's very educational. This is how you do it, ladies and gentlemen. You do your research, you stay within your lanes/boundaries, and if there's a problem, you take it up with the courts.

I used to think Bay Area Transparency was the Man when it comes to 1st Amendment audits...
I now stand corrected.

This guy's got the knowledge, man. The man's the Man. Few people have what this guy has(for 1st Admendment Audits). He's like a Goldmine...

[lol...guess what movie I borrowed that quote from. Lol]
 
styropyro! :)

 
What do you guys think of this guy's analysis of INFJs?:



So far, in a nutshell, my overarching thought of this was: "this is why I like INTPs so much. They get us...like, really understand the INFJ mind". Lol. something like that.
 
Skydiving without a parachute. Fun!
 
What do you guys think of this guy's analysis of INFJs?:
It all sounds pretty good to me, but I think he's a bit like Galileo explaining that free falling objects fall at the same rate regardless of their shape and mass. While this might be true in theory and you could see it just like that on the surface of the moon, it isn't so on earth with its air and its winds and its frictions. If you drop a feather and a lead weight off a tower the lead weight will certainly hit the ground long before the feather which might get blown about for ages before landing - and it might well get caught in a roof or tree and never reach the ground. This is the fate of many INFJs.

The only thing I disagreed with is when he says that we are driven by wanting to bring beneficial change to the world as our main focus. I actually think that we are on the whole explorers first, living on the edge of society and observing with our inner eye - we want to understand more than to act and to shape, and we dive deep into the shadows of this understanding. We share this focus with our INTJ siblings, but where theirs is less personalised, we are more interested in the personal side of the world, and we fill it with spirits, metaphorically speaking. If we can bring some good to the world then that is a huge and wonderful thing for us, but it is secondary to this deep need to look and understand, and to be part of. It's like wanting to climb the mountain ranges of understanding to see what lies beyond - the new valleys and further mountain ranges and to feel the wind in our faces in the bright starlight. We find that when we return from these journeys and describe our explorations, most others don't understand because they have no similar experiences of their own to fit the words to.
 
Back
Top