link
Im okay with not being considered smart for being an S, but when people try to present evidence for that by saying that William Shakespeare had an IQ of 205... seems like a misuse of data.
lol. this is so silly it's laughable.
people possess various kinds of intelligence. two hundred years ago, Ns would have likely been chided and ostracized for their lack of practical interests and know-how survival skills, or for having their heads in the clouds. different times prioritize different skills. people can lead and benefit others in various ways. and imo all types are capable of leading -- these skills can be developed and honed. besides, doing something practical like raising one's child to be a kind and honourable individual has as much merit as something that makes much more noise in society. all contributions matter.
UBERROGO feigns errors. It is a trap.And it's 210. Shakespeare's IQ is listed as being 210.
This guy has some stupid reasoning.
It is the internet. Some things that are said on the internet are merely relatively well presented trash.
Although I'm not saying that article is trash, I would put little to no stock in it.
And I'd take issue with Einstein being an INTP. I doubt he was T. (Shock horror.) Which I guess means I am everyones' MBTI fan-canon heretic until T egos and NT egos are gotten over.
![]()
That is an interesting conclusion. What type do you think he is? INFP? Or some other type altogether?