Youth Going Through Gender Transition Are More At Risk Of Psychiatric Issues

If someone tells you they're something, that is what they are. Who are you to have the ego to tell them otherwise, as if you know that person better than they know themselves?

Okay... I'm the president of the United States... I just claimed it, so it must be real, right?
 
Okay... I'm the president of the United States... I just claimed it, so it must be real, right?
Why not be someone really cool, if the world is our objective reality oyster now, perhaps Harriet Tubman or Abraham Lincoln? Why not? 😎✨
 


In the Roman Catholic Church, he is considered the Vicar of Jesus Christ. He's not exactly a minor figure.
Coincidentally, what he is saying reflects exactly, word for word, what is happening in here. On both sides.
I was reluctant to share it, given the climate. But I believe that at this point, the correlation between God and gender identity drops to zero. Anyone who continues to foment gender or religious radicalism, in my eyes, only wants to feed the feud.

Anyone who claimed that the Roman Catholic Church is unhealthy knows nothing about my church and is speaking purely from hearsay. I would stake my life on it. You can know all the prayers in the world, but if you don't know how to apply the precepts of Christ...

Edit:

You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous."
(Matthew 5:43-45)

Let him who is without sin cast the first stone. But I have the impression that many of us are sinners, and anyone who thinks that believing in God makes you a bigot is literally proving to be a bigot themselves, because they see their own point of view as the only valid one. Doesn't imposing one's perspective at all costs remind you of fascism?


-Giammarco
 
Last edited:


In the Roman Catholic Church, he is considered the Vicar of Jesus Christ. He's not exactly a minor figure.
Coincidentally, what he is saying reflects exactly, word for word, what is happening in here. On both sides.
I was reluctant to share it, given the climate. But I believe that at this point, the correlation between God and gender identity drops to zero. Anyone who continues to foment gender or religious radicalism, in my eyes, only wants to feed the feud.

Anyone who claimed that the Roman Catholic Church is unhealthy knows nothing about my church and is speaking purely from hearsay. I would stake my life on it. You can know all the prayers in the world, but if you don't know how to apply the precepts of Christ...

Edit:

You have heard that it was said, 'Love your neighbor and hate your enemy.' But I tell you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you, that you may be children of your Father in heaven. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends rain on the righteous and the unrighteous."
(Matthew 5:43-45)

Let him who is without sin cast the first stone. But I have the impression that many of us are sinners, and anyone who thinks that believing in God makes you a bigot is literally proving to be a bigot themselves, because they see their own point of view as the only valid one. Doesn't imposing one's perspective at all costs remind you of fascism?


-Giammarco

1) I'm not Catholic and I have very good reasons for that. As such, the Pope has zero authority over me.
2) The Pope is right that not all morality is based on sexual ethics.
3) Sexual ethics remain relevant because of the way they have eroded the nuclear family, leading to plummeting birthrates across the globe.
4) I am pretty sure the Pope does not condone homosexuality or other sexually deviant identities. He just doesn't focus on them as much as other Christians do.
 
1) I'm not Catholic and I have very good reasons for that. As such, the Pope has zero authority over me.
2) The Pope is right that not all morality is based on sexual ethics.
3) Sexual ethics remain relevant because of the way they have eroded the nuclear family, leading to plummeting birthrates across the globe.
4) I am pretty sure the Pope does not condone homosexuality or other sexually deviant identities. He just doesn't focus on them as much as other Christians do.
So, are you implicitly admitting that you are casting the first stone because you are without sin? Answer me this: would Jesus Christ have stoned a trans person?

edit: Liberal politics and religious fanaticism are just two sides of the same coin. Do you realize you're claiming that your personal view of Christianity is superior to a faith that has existed for millennia,the very foundation that your own beliefs are built upon?


-Giammarco
 
Last edited:
So, are you implicitly admitting that you are casting the first stone because you are without sin? Answer me this: would Jesus Christ have stoned a trans person?

edit: Liberal politics and religious fanaticism are just two sides of the same coin. Do you realize you're claiming that your personal view of Christianity is superior to a faith that has existed for millennia,the very foundation that your own beliefs are built upon?


-Giammarco

I don't want to derail this thread with why I am not Catholic, but the quick version is that they make things obligatory to believe to be saved that have a low probability of being true historically, let alone mentioned in the Bible.

Everyone loves the story of the woman caught in adultery until they actually read what Jesus says to the woman, which is, "Go and sin no more."
 
I don't want to derail this thread with why I am not Catholic, but the quick version is that they make things obligatory to believe to be saved that have a low probability of being true historically, let alone mentioned in the Bible.

Everyone loves the story of the woman caught in adultery until they actually read what Jesus says to the woman, which is, "Go and sin no more."

You are missing the point entirely. Jesus told her to go and sin no more after he had already dismissed her accusers,the very people who, like you, were ready to stone her. You are still holding the stone. Are you 'without sin'? Because that is the only condition upon which you are authorized to judge. And you are judging.
Is that 'Christian' enough of a concept for you?
-Giammarco
 
You are missing the point entirely. Jesus told her to go and sin no more after he had already dismissed her accusers,the very people who, like you, were ready to stone her. You are still holding the stone. Are you 'without sin'? Because that is the only condition upon which you are authorized to judge. And you are judging.
Is that 'Christian' enough of a concept for you?
-Giammarco
edit: the fact you can't reply if Jesus would have stoned a trans is the perfect example of how silence can speak.

-Giammarco
 
You are missing the point entirely. Jesus told her to go and sin no more after he had already dismissed her accusers,the very people who, like you, were ready to stone her. You are still holding the stone. Are you 'without sin'? Because that is the only condition upon which you are authorized to judge. And you are judging.
Is that 'Christian' enough of a concept for you?
-Giammarco

edit: the fact you can't reply if Jesus would have stoned a trans is the perfect example of how silence can speak.

-Giammarco

What on earth are you talking about? Who is stoning anyone? Who is threatening anyone? I certainly am not.

Words ≠ Violence
 
What on earth are you talking about? Who is stoning anyone? Who is threatening anyone? I certainly am not.

Words ≠ Violence
Your whole attitude on Gender Dysphoria is a proof itself. Obviously in this thread.
You know . I know.
No, you’re not 'stoning' anyone, let alone me,you're just using words, and I'm doing the same. At this point, I have to wonder why you're so obsessed with gender identity. Could it be that you're so focused on it because you see yourself in it? Usually, that's how obsessions work.


-Giammarco
 
Last edited:
1) I'm not Catholic and I have very good reasons for that. As such, the Pope has zero authority over me.
2) The Pope is right that not all morality is based on sexual ethics.
3) Sexual ethics remain relevant because of the way they have eroded the nuclear family, leading to plummeting birthrates across the globe.
4) I am pretty sure the Pope does not condone homosexuality or other sexually deviant identities. He just doesn't focus on them as much as other Christians do.
This is truth, right here. Only to Catholics do the popes words hold any power whatsoever. Jesus is crystal clear on the topic and this is what differentiates Catholicism.

John 14:6
Jesus answered, “I am the way and the truth and the life. No one comes to the Father except through me.”

In Jesus own words.

The pope is not supposed to be an idol. That would be idolatry, which Jesus condemns. Only God is to be idolized. I agree that we are to listen to Jesus words and not pope Leos. 👌
 
So, are you implicitly admitting that you are casting the first stone because you are without sin? Answer me this: would Jesus Christ have stoned a trans person?

edit: Liberal politics and religious fanaticism are just two sides of the same coin. Do you realize you're claiming that your personal view of Christianity is superior to a faith that has existed for millennia,the very foundation that your own beliefs are built upon?


-Giammarco
No no no… he is not saying his view is superior. He is saying God’s view on how we are to be behave is. These instructions come to us in a handy manual called the bible. Those with faith believe it’s words, those without do not.

This is where Satan has twisted morality as we see it in the world today, where everyone who believes the word of God set forth in the bible and swims against the popularity of sin is labeled phobic.

I have said it for years, the bible has predicted this in Mathew, Revelation, and many other books. Evil will become normal. Right will become wrong ( prejudice, bigoted, phobic, intolerant ) - fill in the blanks.

Keep your eyes open, hide and watch, because it’s only going to get worse from here. Soon people will fight for legal incestuous couplings, then legalized pedophilia. Shiver. Just look around.. they’re already staring to use woke terminology for it - “map” = Minor Attracted Persons”.

We wouldn’t want to discriminate against the minor attracted persons, would we?

“Woe to the inhabitants of the earth”.
 
Last edited:
Your whole attitude on Gender Dysphoria is a proof itself. Obviously in this thread.
You know . I know.
No, you’re not 'stoning' anyone, let alone me,you're just using words, and I'm doing the same. At this point, I have to wonder why you're so obsessed with gender identity. Could it be that you're so focused on it because you see yourself in it? Usually, that's how obsessions work.


-Giammarco
G… . :/

He’s not obsessed with it - he’s just telling you it’s wrong according to the word of God.

That’s no stoning, nor obsessive. The reasons were outlined far back in this thread as to why many people are vocal about it. Such as the example John gave.. of the little girls in the locker room. Schools indoctrinating now days, instead of just doing their job - teaching. Forcing people who don’t subscribe to gender ideology to bow to the pronouns and participate in the delusions of others?

Why is this such a hard concept to understand? We all speak English well no?
 
Your whole attitude on Gender Dysphoria is a proof itself. Obviously in this thread.
You know . I know.
No, you’re not 'stoning' anyone, let alone me,you're just using words, and I'm doing the same. At this point, I have to wonder why you're so obsessed with gender identity. Could it be that you're so focused on it because you see yourself in it? Usually, that's how obsessions work.


-Giammarco

It's an issue I care about because I think it's unnatural/perverted.

I'm not obsessed with it and I have no idea where this accusation comes from... I originally made a wordless post just linking an article and people made it about everything except the article. I can't be blamed for that, surely?

I'm obsessed with Christ if I am obsesses with anything.
 
G… . :/

He’s not obsessed with it - he’s just telling you it’s wrong according to the word of God.

That’s no stoning, nor obsessive. The reasons were outlined far back in this thread as to why many people are vocal about it. Such as the example John gave.. of the little girls in the locker room. Schools indoctrinating now days, instead of just doing their job - teaching. Forcing people who don’t subscribe to gender ideology to bow to the pronouns and participate in the delusions of others?

Why is this such a hard concept to understand? We all speak English well no?

He thinks I am obsessed because of my level of conviction about this.

Conviction looks like hate to many people because they are not fundamentally principled people.
 
He thinks I am obsessed because of my level of conviction about this.

Conviction looks like hate to many people because they are not fundamentally principled people.

The heart of the Christian message is solidarity with those who are marginalized or judged. Christ was incredibly harsh with those who used religion to oppress, but infinitely welcoming toward those considered sinners. As for the manipulation of the concept of gender identity by a certain culture,that is a whole different story and I agree that things must stay clear.
If they are gay ecc it's not my problem, I cannot judge them. It's between them and God.
Christianity builds bridges; it does not divide.
what are you building with this thread ?

-Giammarco
 
The heart of the Christian message is solidarity with those who are marginalized or judged.

False. The heart of the Christian message is repentance.

Jesus says, when the Apostles say, "This could have been sold to help the poor," he says, "You will always have the poor; you will not always have me." Basically, Jesus was saying he is more important than helping the poor. That doesn't mean we don't help the poor. It means there exists something about Jesus that is better than helping the poor. This is a message that is offensive to our Western liberal world that is obsessed with finding more and more victims and never have a finish line on when we finally have made it in our pursuit of social justice.
 
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

That which is presented without may be regarded for what it is—opinion—and summarily dismissed, or entertained, in accordance with reason or one’s preference.

Cheers,
Ian
 
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.

That which is presented without may be regarded for what it is—opinion—and summarily dismissed, or entertained, in accordance with reason or one’s preference.

Cheers,
Ian

"Extraordinary evidence" is code for "Nothing would convince me."
 
Back
Top