- MBTI
- infj
- Enneagram
- ....
I have to do no research to see this.
Well at least your sorta honest.
I have to do no research to see this.
If Hitler had nukes? I seriously doubt he would have attacked Israel, it didnt exist... and he had the jews in his camps... he would have used his Nukes on Russia and the United States to gain control. Contrary to popular belief Hitler wanted to rule, not just to kill the jews. That was just 1 "solution" his people devised of many. By the way, they also gassed homosexuals, mentally handicapped people, gypsies, undesirables, political enemies, etc etc.
If I was mentally handicapped I would demand my own country, just for fairness sake.
But seriously, why do Jews deserve protection and not Arabs? Seems to me that Jews who arent even suffering the threat of Iran want to get in on the killing. Is it any wonder Jews get treated like they do?
The sites were bombed for nuclear-related activities. What would Hitler have done with nukes? I did not get even a guesstimate.
If you do not know who Iran has threatened to obliterate, I'm not going to tell you. Nobody is trying to destroy the Jews in Israel?
Maybe I have been living in a different world.....
The days of smart bombs have drastically changed American warfare and goals. I have to do no research to see this.
Based upon whose judgment and whose values?Your reply assumes all governments are equal, when in reality people are not the same, and governments are not the same. We don't give guns to 5 year olds or paranoid schizophrenics or old people with alzehimers. In the same way, there are some governments in the world that can be trusted with nukes, and other governments that cannot.
I'll just say there will be a rude awakening one day, and it makes me feel pretty sad. Feel it coming.
Maybe is most of Europe hadn't tried to appease Hitler, then less of it's cities would have been leveled. At least less of the ones near the U.K.
Some people have the ability to understand things others simply cannot understand. There are many things I certainly do not fully understand, as they are not my calling. Each of us have gifts; hence, each of us better at some things than others. There are, of course, those that think they are gifted in all things and understand all things. There are those that think they are better than anyone else. On the other end of the spectrum of light, there are those that feel they are not as good as anyone else. There are those that feel they simply are lesser than most.
Everyone has a certain ability to think and feel the way they do. Some may call that a right, but I choose the word "ability". People that are using their abilities to better serve humanity are definitely living the life of their calling. There are most definitely other abilities than just thinking and feeling.
I have found politics and such to exploit the people to the point they are talking and even voting outside their abilities. There are specific things not voted on, though mostly our elected officials may very well make the call on those things. I would guess that means we have had our say to a certain degree.
I would never go to a control tower and tell someone in air traffic control what I thought they should do. I would never tell a brain surgeon how to perform brain surgery. I did tell brain specialist one time I thought they might could stimulate adjacent areas to the Brochas to try to help someone speak, but a loved one had lost their ability to speak and I was just trying to get someone to think outside the box. One of them felt it rediculous, while a neurosurgeon made a funny look on their face that they might look into that one day. My point is multifaceted, but the gist of it is there are people that understand what they are doing and it is best to leave them to their jobs. Some people are performing their masterpieces from their experience, while others are just beginning to learn of the subject. I have seen quite a few bold and brassy guys filled with testosterone and their egos get put in their place by experienced fighters. There are, of course, exceptions to the rule.
There are entirely too many armchair warriors that think or feel they know what is best in a volatile situation. Maybe they should have gone to Iraq and put out the oil fires. Maybe they should have placed the first man on the moon and brought him back home. I am glad to see so may authorities, as that is what the world needs. Please do not take this as a stab or a poke.
If the world had handled Germany differently then there wouldn't have been a Hitler. Hitler's support grew out of peoples anger at how germany was treated after WW1 and over the role the international bankers played in it all
Don't along with the world crap, it was Europe that screwed Germany after the WWI, the U.S. actively lent money to Germany after WWI to help with it's debt.
No it lent money to get Germany INTO DEBT
That's how it all works! Thats what the IMF and World Bank are doing to 3rd world countries today. That's why Hitler rejected any money from the money markets and started printing mefo bills
I've got some bad news for you. The US empire is collapsing. It has overstretched itself, allowed itself to be sucked into unwinnable wars and has created a giant economic ponzi scheme through fractional reserve banking and various financial instruments designed to cloak illegal activity.
There is going to be riots in the US and quite possibly a revolution which is why the government has passed NDAA and why it has set up FEMA: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fema
You're on the way out...kaput...geddit?
Now all you need to ask yourself is if you want your empire to collapse messily lashing out at other countries, which will only help the military industrial complex or do you want to challenge the authority in your country and ask them what the hell they've been playing at?
Don't blame the Iranians for the fuck ups of the US
Germany was forced to pay reparations under the Treaty of Versailles, not any world bank. Germany then defaulted on that debt, the U.S. then loan Germany money to pay of France and Britain via the Dawes plan. Also what the hell are you talking about, have I mentioned anything outside of the time between WWI and WWII? What does Iran have to do with your bad history? oh wait it's because of your bad history...........
'Nuclear related activities'....that's a good one! That's right up there with 'weapons of mass destruction'
Why are we discussing what would have happened if hitler got the a bomb? He had a V2 rocket which could possibly have delivered the bomb and who would have been in the firing line? Us...the brits...not you. it was our cities that got flattened in the blitz, not yours.
Thanks to the bravery of Norwegian commandoes the heavy water factories were destroyed. 50 British commandos died in an aeroplane crash as part of this raid. The only part the US played in this was in making the film after the war called 'the heroes of telemark'!
While i'm at it, Hollywood claimed in its film 'enigma' that the US captured the enigma machine, but it didn't the UK did! Hollywood also depicted Errol Flynn single handedly capturing Burma in 'Operation Burma' when the US was barely involved in that theatre. Hollywood doesn't like to let fact get in the way of a good lie though does it?
If people are trying to obliterate jews in Israel then they are doing a pretty crap job of it; it seems to me its the Palestineans being obliterated.
Smart bombs are not stopping the killing of civilians in drone attacks. They were there since the first gulf war but one million Iraqis have still been killed in the second conflict. Not to mention the sanctions imposed on Iraq before the war which killed hundreds of thousands of civilians: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sanctions_against_Iraq
Maybe is most of Europe hadn't tried to appease Hitler, then less of it's cities would have been leveled. At least less of the ones near the U.K.
If the world had handled Germany differently then there wouldn't have been a Hitler. Hitler's support grew out of peoples anger at how germany was treated after WW1 and over the role the international bankers played in it all
Don't along with the world crap, it was Europe that screwed Germany after the WWI, the U.S. actively lent money to Germany after WWI to help with it's debt.
This is what sparked the conversation we are having, I responded with this
you replied with this
To which I replied
Do you get where this is going, I'm not talking about Iran, I'm talking about the time period between WWI WWII which led to Hitler. No the U.S. wasn't trying to control Germany, if they wanted the Germans indebted they could have demanded reparations from the TOV. Instead, President Wilson went about trying to bring peace and stabilization to Europe through the league of nations and worked for Germany to have less required from them in reparations and then tried to loan the Germans the money so that they wouldn't default (which they did, Wilson couldn't work fast enough unfortunately). To say that what was put on the Germans post-war was fair would be anything but the truth, but it was Europe that lead to the creation of Hitlers 3rd Reich, not the U.S.