@Asa I don’t think this is lacking in etiquette. For a start, how were you to know they’d broken up? If the photo represented an occasion that was very special to them as a couple then it was charitable of you to withdraw your comment when you found out.
If it wasn’t a special occasion for them, then I can maybe understand her problem, but I can’t sympathise. She wasn’t in the photo, she wasn’t tagged, and she says she and V are still on good terms.
I think there is only so much we can do to accommodate each partner of a couple that splits up. Neither of them can reasonably expect the split to mean old friends cannot reconnect - that would be a significant breach of etiquette in my book.
She's just harboring some unresolved feelings and placing them on you
It's a faux pas from her perspective due to the discomfort of having to recall those feelings
Nobody outside of her is going to feel the same way
I will add that I would have deleted my comment too. I tend towards self-censor if it serves to preserve someoneʼs emotional well-being within the context of relationships, regardless of my thoughts.
The exception being self-expression about my experience of my own primary relationships. That said, I tend to keep that close to the breast, because reflection on intimacies carries forward the original mutual consent. Those emotional truths arenʼt secrets...they simply live with the dyad, and rightfully perish outside of that.
Cheers,
Ian
My feeling is that understanding the social rules and how we actually respond to a particular situation are two very different things, and rightly so. We all tolerate children's behaviour up to a point for example, and those of us who have had dealings with elderly folks treading the path of dementia know that social rules are not the main guiding light. This is an exaggeration to make the point, but in my book social rules aren't the most important thing - there are times when we make allowances because we care for each other. You obviously triggered something painful for this lady even though what you did was definitely not a 'sin' against etiquette - I bet you that the awkward relationship between those two is leading to similar difficulties with other friends and family. I had something sort of similar happen to me in the forum a few years ago - a returning member I didn't know objected to my user name because it was too close to that of someone she had cared for previously who had gone quite a while before I joined. I was sad for her, but I wasn't willing to change it because I'm using my own given name. If I had created an invented user name instead, I may well have changed it in order to allow for her distress.I do believe expecting people to change [random] decisions and actions that do not directly affect a person is a breach of etiquette, but I also know people with broken hearts are sensitive and irrational, and I am empathetic. If the situation was different and she was in the photo, there was trauma of any kind related to the end of the relationship (abuse, death, a nasty break-up, or anything else), and if I knew the circumstances and commented anyway, I'd be at fault.
I am bothered by people who make up rules, do not inform others of those rules, and then get upset if we break the mysterious, unspoken rules. This is skirting that territory to me. I also like this woman and wouldn't want to hurt her. There is probably something else going on with this break-up that she isn't telling me. It was easy for me to just delete my comment.
It's kind of funny because my target was picking up the signal of the other woman in the photo, who seems to be going through something and has grown distant from friends. V's ex interfered with my effort. LOL. Oh well. I will find another way.
You're likely right.My feeling is that understanding the social rules and how we actually respond to a particular situation are two very different things, and rightly so. We all tolerate children's behaviour up to a point for example, and those of us who have had dealings with elderly folks treading the path of dementia know that social rules are not the main guiding light. This is an exaggeration to make the point, but in my book social rules aren't the most important thing - there are times when we make allowances because we care for each other. You obviously triggered something painful for this lady even though what you did was definitely not a 'sin' against etiquette - I bet you that the awkward relationship between those two is leading to similar difficulties with other friends and family. I had something sort of similar happen to me in the forum a few years ago - a returning member I didn't know objected to my user name because it was too close to that of someone she had cared for previously who had gone quite a while before I joined. I was sad for her, but I wasn't willing to change it because I'm using my own given name. If I had created an invented user name instead, I may well have changed it in order to allow for her distress.
I hope you manage to reconnect with these guys OK.
I love this. The rule seems silly and I would naturally scoff at it, but with that explanation, it feels so much warmer. I think I would feel that in a home without necessarily understanding why it feels comfortable.Why, though? I've read that it began when electricity was new, and people with electricity burned the wicks of their candles to make those who could not afford electricity feel more comfortable in their homes. The other reason is that we aren't supposed to display anything that our guests can't use. If you display pretty soaps, a fruit bowl, candles, candy, etc, it should be okay for your guests to use these items. They shouldn't feel uncomfortable using the items, and they shouldn't wonder if they are "allowed" to use them.
I love this. The rule seems silly and I would naturally scoff at it, but with that explanation, it feels so much warmer. I think I would feel that in a home without necessarily understanding why it feels comfortable.
I appreciate you and the way you approach these ideas of etiquette.
I was a frequent flier for many years and always booked an aisle seat. It’s not just access to the inflight facilities but it got you off the plane faster when it landed. It never bothered me when anyone needed to wake me up to get past - needs must, and I never slept deeply on a plane anyway. I suspect many folks who travel overnight sleep only very lightly.What's the etiquette on a plane when you're on a window seat, need to get up, and the passenger next to you is asleep and the row in front is reclining?
A. Try to scoot past.
B. Tap on shoulder.
C. Bump their elbow repeatedly.
D. Tug on their sleeve.
E. Talk into their ear.
F. Something else.
I was a frequent flier for many years and always booked an aisle seat. It’s not just access to the inflight facilities but it got you off the plane faster when it landed. It never bothered me when anyone needed to wake me up to get past - needs must, and I never slept deeply on a plane anyway. I suspect many folks who travel overnight sleep only very lightly.
I always found the biggest problem was the anxiety when someone came down the aisle during boarding carrying a baby on a transatlantic overnight flight. And the relief when they walked on by to a different part of the plane. People who have to travel with an infant on long haul need a big medal, and so does everyone within 5 rows of them lol. But that’s not an etiquette problem as long as mum or dad have brought something for the kid to suck to try and clear its ear pressure.
Of course you donʼt...youʼre a native Minnesotan!Also, how much small talk is sufficient as you are saying goodbye? I don't have a sense of when the goodbye is complete?