i'm not sure i entirely agree with that
i mean i think that religions have been subverted and controlled by people seeking to control society but i think there are ways to interprete what they are saying that fits in with a more universal human experience
so for example here is jordan peterson (INFJ) speaking about how the story of buddha is the story of our fall into the world of adulthood (chaos) from where we then have to seek a return back to order through the process of redemption
Ah!
That is who you get all the communist and marxist garbled melange of “theories” from...making more sense now.
And the INTJs and INTPs all argue that he is one of them as well as INFJs and ENFJs...so, not sure that’s factual.
This must be your favorite guy because your “politics" are exactly his own.
Hmmmm...
(Peterson groupie?)
"Peterson considers that the universities should be held as among the most responsible for the wave of political correctness which appeared in North America and Europe.
[27] According to Peterson, he watched the rise of political correctness on campuses since the early 1990s,
[55] and considers that the
humanities have become corrupt, less reliant on science, and instead of "intelligent conversation, we are having an ideological conversation". From his own experience as a university professor, he states that the students who are coming to his classes are uneducated and unaware about the mass exterminations and crimes by
Stalinism and
Maoism, which were not given the same attention as
fascism and
Nazism. He also says that "instead of being ennobled or inculcated into the proper culture, the last vestiges of structure are stripped from [the students] by post-modernism and
neo-Marxism, which defines everything in terms of
relativism and
power".
[23][56][57]
And so since the 1970s, under the guise of
postmodernism, we've seen the rapid expansion of
identity politics throughout the universities, it's come to dominate all of the
humanities – which are dead as far as I can tell – and a huge proportion of the
social sciences ... We've been publicly funding extremely radical, postmodern leftist thinkers who are hellbent on demolishing the fundamental substructure of
Western civilization. And that's no paranoid delusion. That's their self-admitted goal ...
Jacques Derrida ... most trenchantly formulated the anti-Western philosophy that is being pursued so assiduously by the radical left.
— Peterson, 2017
[56]
Peterson states that postmodern philosophers and sociologists since the 1960s
[51] have built upon and extended certain core tenets of
Marxism and
communism while simultaneously appearing to disavow both ideologies. He says that it is difficult to understand contemporary
Western societywithout considering the influence of a strain of postmodernism thought that migrated from France to the United States through the English department at
Yale University. He states that certain academics in the
humanities "started to play a sleight of hand, and instead of pitting the
proletariat, the
working class, against the
bourgeois, they started to pit the
oppressed against the oppressor. That opened up the avenue to identifying any number of groups as oppressed and oppressor and to continue the same narrative under a different name ... The people who hold this doctrine – this radical, postmodern,
communitarian doctrine that makes
racial identity or
sexual identity or
gender identity or some kind of group identity paramount – they've got control over most low-to-mid level bureaucratic structures, and many governments as well".
[56][26] Peterson's perspective on the influence of postmodernism on North American humanities departments has been compared to Cultural Marxist conspiracy theories.[36][58][59][60]
Peterson recommends that the state halt funding to faculties and courses he describes as neo-Marxist, and advises students to avoid disciplines like
women's studies,
ethnic studies and racial studies, as well other fields of study he believes are corrupted by the ideology such as
sociology,
anthropology and
English literature.
[61][62] He says that these fields, under the pretense of academic inquiry, propagate unscientific methods, fraudulent peer-review processes for academic journals, publications that garner zero citations,
[63] cult-like behaviour,
[61] safe-spaces,
[64] and radical left-wing political activism for students.
[51] Peterson has proposed launching a website which uses
artificial intelligence to identify and showcase the amount of ideologization in specific courses. He announced in November 2017 that he had temporarily postponed the project as "it might add excessively to current polarization".
[65][66]
Peterson has criticized the use of the term "
white privilege", stating that "being called out on their white privilege, identified with a particular racial group and then made to suffer the consequences of the existence of that racial group and its hypothetical crimes, and that sort of thing has to come to a stop. ... [It's] racist in its extreme".
[51] In regard to identity politics, while "left plays them on behalf of the oppressed, let's say, and the right tends to play them on behalf of
nationalism and
ethnic pride" he considers them "equally dangerous" and that instead should be emphasized
individualism and
individual responsibility.
[67] He has also been prominent in the debate about
cultural appropriation, stating it promotes
self-censorship in society and journalism.
[68]”
LMAO