No, the goal is not to change any entrenched Christians. Nothing can do that obviously. The idea is to wake up those who can be woken up, the ones caught up in the flow but not necessarily partisan one way or another.
We can't, and probably shouldn't, try to change the unwilling. Actually the only reason I debate some times is to be a counterpoint for other people to see and not for my debate opponent, which is why I can be so persistent, because I'm not actually looking to change minds, I'm just seeing to it that another viewpoint is open and available so that any onlookers get multiple sides instead of just one, and let things fall where they may.
Well you're talking about your approach there and i don't have any issues with that (like you i also think that others can benefit from listening to a debate)
What i was talking about though was what those satanists were trying to do by having that statue erected of baphomet
I was making the point that it will scare and upset christians and harden hearts and minds
I don't think it was intended to be a positive mind opening thing by the satanists...i think it is an aggressive public planting of their flag in US soil
I think satanic philosophy seems to be very egotistic and generally from what i've observed not a compassionate one. They are less likely to think ''i think i can share some knowledge here to help fill in these peoples mental maps and see the world in a clearer way''....they are more likely to think: ''ha these people are ignorant i can exploit their ignorance''
I have heard a lot of occult orders make all sorts of lofty claims about what they are about but usually they are hierarchical, secret hoarding, power trippers playing ego games with each other
Arguably the christian church could be said to be the same as an institution but at least if a christian is living by the golden rule they are likely to be a decent person
Satanists perhaps live by their own individual code (whatever they deem that to be)
So a popular person is Aleister Crowley and famous pop stars like Jay Z are fans of crowleys work. Jay Z has a clothes line that has quotes on it like: ''do as thou wilt (shall be the whole of the law)''
A thelemite (a follower of crowleys work) might say in defence of that, that crowley qualified that statement by also saying: ''love is the law, love under will''
But if you look at Crowley the man and judge a tree by its fruit then its possible to see a person riddled with demons who exploited others and left a trail of broken lives in his wake......which is most definately not following the golden rule
His use of 'scarlet women' for example was very exploitative and i would argue NOT empowering for the women (at least one committed suicide afterwards)
So one thing i have learned is that the black magicians do not wear their true opinions on their sleeves....they will often
invert (twist) the truth. they will claim they are about love when they are about hate, they will say they are about light when they are about darkness, they will say they want to help others when they really mean they want to help themselves
I think the key is to judge a tree by its fruit....actions rather than words
And Crowleys institutions such as the OTO are secret hoarding and hierarchical and who basically want to be modern day knights templars and accumulate temporal, material powers