Trump will win again
- Thread starter slant
- Start date
philostam
Well-known member
- MBTI
- INTP
- Enneagram
- 6w5
Cool narrative this guy developed in his head, but he failed to account for reality. This is pure copium, as the kids would say.
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 954 so/sx
I could say the same about you and yours, but you won't absorb that at all.
But anyway, you're right it's obviously biased. It's a channel created for the sole purpose of promoting the left's agenda.
Both sides think the other has the edge, as usual.
.Liberals pretend to be honest when lying and cheating is their nature. It is clear that they have plan upon plan upon plan to steal this election at any cost. Why would the DOD issue a written order authorizing military personnel to use deadly force against civilians. This is unprecedented. Then Raskins plan makes it clear why the directive was given.
- MBTI
- ENFP
- Enneagram
- 947 sx/sp
Source?
Really? Could you make it clear for someone else?
I’m guessing because of the insurrectionists of January 6th, who killed police officers and destroyed public property.
They likely wish to nip such seditious actions in the bud. Also, the January 6th individuals who violated the rule of law did so heavily armed. As such, the DoD doesn’t want to bring a knife to what may become a gunfight.
Cheers,
Ian
Indeed
you sound like a bot to me. Are you a chat bot moderator Ian? Programmed
- MBTI
- ENFP
- Enneagram
- 947 sx/sp
Thanks for sharing your experience. In doing so, we get to know you a bit better.
Cheers,
Ian
SlowUpTake
Community Member
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- ?
"...
Since we published this rapid research post, experts and officials have weighed in on the nature of the DoD directive. Simply put, the directive does not grant the military any new powers that don’t already exist.
As reported in the War Horse, “Contrary to claims online, DOD Directive 5240.01, which had last been updated in 2020, does not grant any new powers to the military. That’s not how military directives work. Like them or not, all military policies are subject to U.S. law; they do not create new legal authorities.”
In a rare move, the DoD pushed back by offering comment to journalists given the spread of the rumor. “The policies concerning the use of force by DOD addressed in DoDD 5240.01 are not new, and do not authorize the DOD to use lethal force against U.S. citizens or people located inside the United States, contrary to rumors and rhetoric circulating on social media,” Gough said in a statement to The Associated Press.
Experts from the Brennan Center published in Just Security: “In reality, while some of the legal authorities governing domestic deployment of the military lack sufficient safeguards and are in urgent need of reform, the changes to this directive do not reflect any change in DoD policy and provide no new authority to deploy the military domestically or to use lethal force in such deployments.” The authors note that there are good reasons to be concerned about the federal government’s power to use armed forces domestically, but this directive’s new language is not one of the them; the point of their report on how the Insurrection Act poses a far greater danger. ..."https://www.cip.uw.edu/2024/10/18/rumors-defense-department-directive-5240-01/
SlowUpTake
Community Member
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- ?
"Liberals pretend to be honest when lying and cheating is their nature" This is offensive and hateful. It is pure shit posting and encourages dehumanization. @Moranga you are demonstrating belligerent and unhinged behavior. It may be that you cannot help yourself but the relentless spewing of venom and hatred is disturbing.
What I lack it what has gotten things to the state they are. Tolerance and compromise.
I speak to the Democratic machine when I say liberals. Not those that blindly follow the party. I say they lie and cheat because of what I see. I'll share.
Nothing hateful or unhinged about calling things for what they are Cheating.
I speak to the Democratic machine when I say liberals. Not those that blindly follow the party. I say they lie and cheat because of what I see. I'll share.
Nothing hateful or unhinged about calling things for what they are Cheating.
Yes that's nice. We get to know you a bit better as well.
SlowUpTake
Community Member
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- ?
so smiling and lying or blindly following.
SlowUpTake
Community Member
- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- ?
Justice Department Sues Virginia for Violating Federal Law’s Prohibition on Systematic Efforts to Remove Voters Within 90 Days of an Election
52 U.S. Code § 20507 - Requirements with respect to administration of voter registration
(A)" A State shall complete, not later than 90 days prior to the date of a primary or general election for Federal office, any program the purpose of which is to systematically remove the names of ineligible voters from the official lists of eligible voters."
of course the fact that it is codified as US law did not stop SCOTUS from suspending the law (wtf?) nevermind that anyone who is a naturalized US citizen had to have a green card before hand
-----------------------------------------
Laurel County Clerk Tony Brown, a Republican, said in an interview Thursday that his staff couldn’t re-create the issue, but that it pulled the machine aside for examination as soon as it got word of the allegation.
At Brown’s request, an investigator from the state attorney general’s office, a former Kentucky State Police trooper, drove to the county clerk’s office Thursday evening to examine the machine. Brown said in a Facebook post that after several minutes of trying, the investigator re-created the issue once, but couldn’t do it a second time.
---------------------------
Did a voting machine in Arkansas cause a vote for Donald Trump to be cast instead for Kamala Harris? No, that's not true: Elections authorities at the state and local level plus the voting machine manufacturer told Lead Stories the voter accidentally touched the wrong name because they used their finger rather than the stylus provided. Even so, they said a voter has an opportunity to confirm their selection before casting their ballot. They noted there is no evidence provided that any votes were actually flipped.
The claim appeared in a video on TikTok (archived here) on October 31, https://leadstories.com/hoax-alert/...achine-did-not-flip-trump-vote-to-Harris.html
-------------------------------
Just weeks before the Supreme Court ruled,[on the case in Colorado challenging trump's eligibility due to the 14th amendment] Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.) — a constitutional lawyer and prominent ally of House leaders — warned that this scenario could come to pass without clarity from the justices.
“They want to kick it to Congress so it’s going to be up to us on January 6, 2025 to tell the rampaging Trump mobs that he’s disqualified,” Raskin said on Feb. 8, describing hypothetically what could happen if the Supreme Court failed to apply the 14th Amendment to Trump, “and then we need bodyguards for everybody and civil war conditions all because the nine justices … simply do not want to do their job and interpret what the great 14th Amendment means.”
But in the ensuing eight months, neither Raskin nor any of his colleagues have endorsed using the Jan. 6 joint session to attempt to deny Trump his electors. https://www.politico.com/news/2024/10/31/donald-trump-january-6-election-certification-00186618
------------------------------------------------
By themselves, the leaked passwords aren't enough to access or alter the state's voting equipment, Griswold said earlier this week after the Colorado Republican Party publicized the existence of the spreadsheet on the Secretary of State's website.
The GOP issued a release days after Griswold's staff replaced the spreadsheet on Oct. 24 with a file that didn't include the passwords.
Every piece of election equipment in use by Colorado counties requires two passwords — one held by the Secretary of State's Office and the other known only to personnel in each county clerk's office — and is required by law to be stored in secure rooms under constant video surveillance, a spokesman for Griswold said.
Griswold said in an interview with 9News that a "civil servant" who no longer works at the department was responsible for uploading a file that "improperly included" voting system passwords in a hidden worksheet in an inventory of election equipment.
Griswold earlier acknowledged that the spreadsheet had been posted online for months to the Colorado Secretary of State's Office website and that a hidden worksheet on the document could display passwords to some components of the state's election system. https://www.coloradopolitics.com/el...cle_0a27e3f2-98aa-11ef-8cb3-a7da55f4f664.html
------------------------------
Pennsylvania, unlike other states, does not have early voting, where you vote just like going to the polls on Election Day, despite the presidential campaigns on both sides urging voters to make their choice ahead of Tuesday in this critical swing state.
On-demand voting, which is essentially filling out a mail-in ballot in one step that includes applying for, receiving, filling out, and in some cases, returning the ballot at a government office, has been a long process for Bucks County voters this election cycle. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news...llots-early-voting-trump-lawsuit/75996823007/
---------------------------------------------------
Project Veritas, a right-wing organization led by James O’Keefe, published a video on Sept. 27 that purports to contain proof that Democratic Rep. Ilhan Omar is linked to a “cash for ballots voter fraud scheme.”
The 17-minute video relies on unnamed sources, covert footage and uncorroborated translations from Somali to English to allege that canvassers for Omar and for City Council candidate Jamal Osman paid for votes in a recent election.
Omar defeated her primary challenger, Antone Melton-Meaux, on Aug. 11, with more than 60% of the vote.
Fact check: No proof of alleged voter fraud scheme or connection to Rep. Ilhan Omar
A video from Project Veritas relies on unnamed sources, covert footage and uncorroborated translations from Somali. We rate its claims as false.
www.usatoday.com
-------------------------------------------
Trump sues CBS in federal Texas court over 'deceptive' editing of Harris '60 Minutes' interview
The lawsuit was filed in the Northern District of Texas’ Amarillo branch, where Kacsmaryk is the only judge. In addition to being a Trump appointee, Kacsmaryk is a former attorney with religious rights legal organization First Liberty Institute in Plano.Kacsmaryk’s court has become a destination for conservative challenges to federal law, something that’s been criticized as “judge shopping.” He ruled to put a hold on the Food and Drug Administration’s approval of the abortion medication mifepristone last year, more than 20 years after it was initially approved for use. https://www.marfapublicradio.org/po...eptive-editing-of-harris-60-minutes-interview