just me
Well-known member
- MBTI
- infj
Last edited:
Oh, did we inconveniece you? Did we not fall over ourselves to hang on your every word and make "you feel good" about yourself. Way to do God's work at your leisure and then at your earliest convenience disappear as if you had accomplished something, which as you said earlier is your own sinful nature to spread blasphemy since you cannot possibly choose to do good.
Seriously, go fuck yourself. I'm usually respectful of a person's beliefs, but I am very certain that you are neither sincere nor in the right to anything you claim.
Argument for argument's sake is only useful for those who wish to sharpen their mental acuity and possibly learn something along the way. I think what is going on here is not that people are arguing for the sake of arguing. I think people are expressing disagreement.
I am disagreeing with your rejection of 90% of what is in the New Testament. I think you have to come to terms with the fact that you are not interested in Christ's message. You are only interested in avoiding hell. This is reflected in your lack of serenity and maturity in speech. Your lack of maturity is reflected in your inability to engage with what others say in a constructive way. Saying "your ignorant" and running away indicates to me that you cannot discuss any Scriptural subject, besides the very narrow topic you have chosen to champion. This inability is either because you are not actually interested in the Scriptures, or because you are having an immature tantrum towards whoever refuses to enter into your extremely narrow reading of Scripture.
Faith is necessary for salvation (some qualifications noted), but there is so much more in the Scriptures for those who already have faith, indicating that faith is only the beginning of the Christian life and of Salvation. St Paul and St John are adamant that Charity is the perfection of faith - and this charity is worked out in a multitude of ways. @SovereignGrace if you ever wish to move on beyond the most basic and simple starting point of the Christian life; that is, if you ever develop an interest in, or love for Christ and His Scriptures, we can start having a discussion. You are not interested in Christ, or His ways - your are only interested in avoiding hell, which while a very sensible sentiment, cannot be the primary aim of a Christian. A Christian is not characterised by fleeing in fear; but by moving forward in peace and love towards Christ.
You never DID answer my sincere question!
Unless your question had to do with how God saves sinners, I really don't feel any desire to respond.
How is one to be saved when we are so evil that we cannot even choose to be saved? By your reasoning, there is no salvation nor redemption because we are so "totally enslaved to evil."
I did, in fact, ask you this very question.
How is one to be saved when we are so evil that we cannot even choose to be saved? By your reasoning, there is no salvation nor redemption because we are so "totally enslaved to evil."
Since we are so evil by nature we will not and cannot choose to be saved, GOD must save us by supernatural regeneration--by raising us from spiritual death and giving us spiritual life and faith.
It's altogether a work of God. And God has the right to give it to whom he pleases.
Nevertheless, if anyone seeks understanding he will find it, because if anyone truly seeks it, it's because God GAVE him the will to seek it.
In other words, every aspect of salvation is of God, from start to finish, so that no man can boast in the sight of God.
Now that's all I feel like saying at this time.
You've already shown that you are unreasonable and narcissistic, by expecting me to answer your questions.
I will answer when and if I have the time.
Frankly, you have a strange sense of entitlement if you think you can tell me to "go f*** myself" and question my sincerity, and yet expect me to answer your questions at all.
God GAVE him the will to seek it.
God GAVE him the will to seek it.
You also stated that man's will is totally enslaved to sin. How do you resolve this dilemma?
There is no dilemma. God simply OVERPOWERS the will.
God GIVES the person a new will that DOES seek the things of God.
What is so hard to understand about that?
And by the way---that old will remains alongside the new will, fighting one against the other, until that saved sinner dies.
Only when that saved sinner is taken to glory, does he become completely free of sin and unbelief.
Until then, he must rely on God's grace, trusting in Christ as his righteousness before God.
EDIT:
Also, The idea that God cannot or will not "violate" a person's free will is absurd, and totally un-Biblical.
Unless he overpowers a person's will, that person will never be saved.
I really don't have time to give in-depth answers on the forum, but I can point you to other resources.
There are plenty of books, websites, sermon audio, etc. that I can recommend if you want to know more.
For starters, you could listen to the sermon link in the O.P.
There is no dilemma. God simply OVERPOWERS the will.
God GIVES the person a new will that DOES seek the things of God.
What is so hard to understand about that?
And by the way---that old will remains alongside the new will, fighting one against the other, until that saved sinner dies.
Only when that saved sinner is taken to glory, does he become completely free of sin and unbelief.
Until then, he must rely on God's grace, trusting in Christ as his righteousness before God.
EDIT:
Also, The idea that God cannot or will not "violate" a person's free will is absurd, and totally un-Biblical.
Unless he overpowers a person's will, that person will never be saved.
I really don't have time to give in-depth answers on the forum, but I can point you to other resources.
There are plenty of books, websites, sermon audio, etc. that I can recommend if you want to know more.
For starters, you could listen to the sermon link in the O.P.
Well, that is an interesting response. Unfortunatly I believe it is simply semantics to redirect the issue.
That is fine for after the fact, but not before the fact. How does one seek it in the first place if man, as you said in your own words, can not and will not seek the good.
You make an impossible barrier to entry and then resolve it with a miracle of God. I am stating, as a matter of fact, that your premise that man is incapable of choice is incorrect. I do not have any issue with how you believe God works miracles, but you place a contradictory state of affairs before us when you claim that man has a will of evil and that man has no will at all.
Neither of these are exceptions to entry into the grace of God. There has to be choice to go from evil to good. There has to be a willful movement from one state to the other. Otherwise, both our state of sin and state of grace are both willful works of God and as such we have nothing to speak of, argue, debate, consider, or do. Either state is effectively moot, irrelevant, and/or illusory.
You have yet to answer when I asked you if God purposefully and intentionally designed us to be sinners.
Nobody is fleeing in fear. I said I simply don't have the time.
You don't seriously think I'm obligated to respond to every question, do you?
Do you think Christ commanded his people to spend all their time on internet forums?
Obviously not.
I've got a full-time job, a wife, and three kids. Do you honestly expect me to spend all my time arguing with a bunch of people who don't have a clue what they're talking about?
If so, you are completely unreasonable.
And all of you seriously need to start READING things before you comment on them.
It would prevent a lot of misunderstanding.
You will become my best friend on this forum, it appears.
I have come to expect no answers from you, because you may not have any.
I admire your zeal that sinners should turn towards God; but all you have is zeal, and a few quotes to back that zeal up - and nothing more. It may be, as you indicate, because of the burdens of family life, or because of a certain inflexibility to absorb what you read in the Scriptures.
So project ignorance onto others, if you feel you must, but don't blame your wife and kids for not having any answers, because despite your claims that we have no freedom, you should take primary responsibility for your own situation.
This is so fucking ridiculous. Let's leave him alone.
Ah, well. I'm just so tired and worn that it's ridiculous. There's really nothing special about what I'm doing.
Like how Marilyn Manson's mother died recently and he made a post on Facebook, which said "To my Mother, the first and greatest believer in me... I hope I see you again someday. But not now, because I have more things I promised I would do. I'll make you proud and satisfied that you know you made the son you wanted," and some people are all talking about how he's not going to see his mother because he is going to hell, looks like a demon from hell, sings the devil's music, and all kinds of inappropriate bullshit. Going so far as to say people like him are the problem with America even.
But if you speak against something like that, you are the one who is intolerant. I am so fucking sick to death that I don't even care.
Yes. It's disgusting and shameful, and totally unwarranted. Most of you need psychological help.
Oh, I've heard about the type of "psychological help" you guys "give" people. Suicides galore. You should go see someone outside of your delusions, though. That would be good for you, and especially your family.