invisible
On Holiday
- MBTI
- none
what i think "cheated" really means here is that the person thought they could get the best of both worlds. they thought they could get the benefits of the exclusively devoted, loving sexual partner, and at the same time, they thought they could get the novelty of multiple sexual partners. that is cheating, its not playing fairly, because those two categories do not cross over, they require an all/nothing investment, but the cheaters thought they could get both at once. they "cheated on" the person who was exclusively devoted to them, because they were not providing the person with the same thing in exchange, which was what had been agreed upon.
a lot of people who preach about polyamory pretend that having many sexual partners provides the same experience as exclusivity, but without all the fussy rules. that is absolute garbage. the experiences are different, just like riding on a unicycle is a different experience to riding on a bicycle or a tandem bicycle. the stuff about rules is also garbage. in polyamorous relationships there are rules about what is permissible and what is not. its just good negotiation and healthy boundary setting to talk about these things, and whether youre exclusive or not, its irresposible or naive to pretend the agreements dont exist.
a lot of people who preach about polyamory pretend that having many sexual partners provides the same experience as exclusivity, but without all the fussy rules. that is absolute garbage. the experiences are different, just like riding on a unicycle is a different experience to riding on a bicycle or a tandem bicycle. the stuff about rules is also garbage. in polyamorous relationships there are rules about what is permissible and what is not. its just good negotiation and healthy boundary setting to talk about these things, and whether youre exclusive or not, its irresposible or naive to pretend the agreements dont exist.