- MBTI
- INFJ
- Enneagram
- 295ish
"Good" is subjective. It's not that there isn't a good candidate, it's that every one has their own ideal of what "good" or "good enough" is.But if there is no "good person" running, this chart is useless. When asked who he is voting for, an economist replied that he is not voting, because both candidates make him sick, but for different reasons. I think he made a valid point. Voting for someone you do not believe in is not necessarily being mature and strategic, but can be considered a way of compromising your integrity and enabling a broken system to continue indefinitely. Neither Donald nor Hillary, in my humble opinion, will change or improve anything substantial for this country. You could even argue, as even some progressives have, that electing Donald could result in a tipping point where by a majority of Americans become fed up and then rise up and demand real change to the federal government and election system. In many ways, even if you are liberal, Hillary is a major compromise, and is like putting a small band aid on our country's problems. She is part of the establishment which has led us to this failed system of governance. She is a symbol of Washington corruption, incompetence, and greed. Not only do Trump supporters hate her, but many Bernie supporters hate her as well. What does she represent? Conservatism? Liberalism? Change? Progress? Standing up to corporations or banks or special interests? Removing government corruption and bureaucracy? Pacifism? Being non-interventionist with regard to foreign disputes which involve combat and violence? Transparency? Consistency? Probably none of the above. Even if you vote for her because you believe her to be the lesser of two evils, that does not mean she deserves to be president. If Hillary were running against even Romney, I think she would lose, just like she lost out to Barry O 8 years ago. She can't win an election unless it involves someone as cartoonishly unqualified as Donald as her competition. And what does that say about her? She couldn't even beat Bernie without DNC help, now the FBI is probably giving her a free pass (for now) to further her cause once again. This should have been the election where everyone came together and rejected the two major parties. We should have found a way to elect a qualified independent candidate who was preferable to all of the current options. If you vote for Hillary or Donald, you are voting for the continuation of a duopoly which screws over everyone except for those in power. United we stand, divided we fall. Or divide and conquer. I am sorry to say that regardless of who wins the White House this week, the citizens of this country will for the most part lose out. I am so tired of these absurd choices. We all need to have higher expectations with regard to our leaders, otherwise we will be led not by the best and the brightest, but by the worst and the stupidest. And we are getting closer all the time. What is happening?
And there are more than two candidates running. There is even an option to write in your own candidate if you choose to do so. You could even vote for Grumpy Cat if you want. You could vote for Darth Vader. You could vote for yourself or even @Milktoast Bandit .
This election isn't just about the presidency, it's also a vote for senators, city council members and officials, and changes to local government that will impact my community, my nephew's education, my father's healthcare, and so much more. I take voting seriously.
Not voting at all, in my very humbled opinion, just shows that someone doesn't give a rat's ass. Which is fine if people honestly don't, but I have strong feelings about people who refuse to vote and then continue to go on about how horrible our government is. A vote for Grumpy Cat speaks a helluva lot louder than someone saying they're not voting at all.
This isn't directed towards you, just my take.
Last edited: