Fed up with modern dating/“quick sex”

Though @ClevelandINTP responses made my day, i agree with @MINFJToothFairy and maybe it's me that should state the obvious :

@ClevelandINTP you're taking this in circles as your first question is answered by your own posts before it!
she is not judging your preferences by stating hers.

I know you know already and your drive was humor and it worked well if i judge from my smile here!
but stop it you two before it gets awkward to INFPs:relaxed:
 
Scissorhands said:
Though @ClevelandINTP responses made my day, i agree with @MINFJToothFairy and maybe it's me that should state the obvious :

@ClevelandINTP you're taking this in circles as your first question is answered by your own posts before it!
she is not judging your preferences by stating hers.

I know you know already and your drive was humor and it worked well if i judge from my smile here!
but stop it you two before it gets awkward to INFPs:relaxed:
Click to expand...

Hehe. We really are just bored individuals looking to waste pixels. Sorry OP. :D
 
Scissorhands said:
Though @ClevelandINTP responses made my day, i agree with @MINFJToothFairy and maybe it's me that should state the obvious :

@ClevelandINTP you're taking this in circles as your first question is answered by your own posts before it!
she is not judging your preferences by stating hers.

I know you know already and your drive was humor and it worked well if i judge from my smile here!
but stop it you two before it gets awkward to INFPs:relaxed:
Click to expand...

You've lost me
 
Seriously, I'm not even sure how my question is answered by myself; hence, the point of the question

I sense subjective judgment without context or enough information to assert that which was also the point of the question
 
I only hope @MINFJToothFairy got to her destination safely and her heart is beating as much as the green dot in the upper left corner of her profile picture so that we may carry on debates that I will most likely win perhaps bigger than before and we then resort to gotcha statements meant to rile the other and show how much we care
 
ClevelandINTP said:
Seriously, I'm not even sure how my question is answered by myself; hence, the point of the question

I sense subjective judgment without context or enough information to assert that which was also the point of the question
Click to expand...


Lol you exhibit the answer. I'm fine. I have parked now. See INTPs are always so keen about arguing your way through words by pointing out technicalities but actually so much context is already hidden between your lines. Then you use your vagueness to catapult the flaw of the reasoning onto others when you have already perfectly set the bait yourself.

You do this as a means of getting a rile out of a conversation and it is actually senselessly fun lol but it is so eye rolling. Seriously.
 
ClevelandINTP said:
I sense subjective judgment without context or enough information to assert that which was also the point of the question
Click to expand...
Well, i agree.
we may have jumped off the fence.
I discovered this forum at 04:00 last night and browsed till morning saturday hours and as i was struggling to wake up, i guess i payed the same attention a driver could (@MINFJToothFairy)


ClevelandINTP said:
People have kinks
Click to expand...

ClevelandINTP said:
Oh, yeah, those are awesome. I have never experienced that blast from one sexual encounter with someone. I mean you might have a good lay or two in there the first few times, but it generally takes awhile to build up to crescendo sex
Click to expand...

If these quotes are taken out of context, you do read like a "different" mentality on the issue
But if one pays closer attention and reads your previous posts, then no.
You don't come out as someone who only enjoys
ClevelandINTP said:
possibly just sex
Click to expand...
without seeing a deeper connection.
Quite the contrary my friend!
 
Creating a blurred subjective reality detached from more complete context is a hallmark of faulty Ni

If it's so obvious, then perhaps, share which data points you're joining to create a massively, technically flawed Voltron of an assertion
 
MINFJToothFairy said:
so much context is already hidden between your lines
Click to expand...

it's the reason INFs talk too much instead.
so no misconceptions can exist in our points, or to make sure we exclude all possible tones and accusations or something that can get someone hurt.
or wait, the latter may be an INFP thing alone :tongueclosed:
 
Scissorhands said:
Well, i agree.
we may have jumped off the fence.
I discovered this forum at 04:00 last night and browsed till morning saturday hours and as i was struggling to wake up, i guess i payed the same attention a driver could (@MINFJToothFairy)






If these quotes are taken out of context, you do read like a "different" mentality on the issue
But if one pays closer attention and reads your previous posts, then no.
You don't come out as someone who only enjoys

without seeing a deeper connection.
Quite the contrary my friend!
Click to expand...

Taken way out of context. If anyone has ever had "the best", "most connected", "spiritual" sex with a partner the first few times, then it would support the position of having sex with people in a more casual way because ONE WOULD NEVER BE ABLE TO REACH THE APEX WITH THAT PERSON EVER AGAIN

What I was saying is I believe those deeper connections take time to build even in the physical sense

If I'm having sex with someone, there was a spark to begin with, the explosion of several sparks might take more than a handful of experiences to get there
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top