Vaccines Debate

perhaps the stress of racism

Rates and predictors of preschool expulsion and suspension were examined in a randomly selected sample of Massachusetts preschool teachers (N = 119). During a 12-month period, 39% of teachers reported expelling at least one child, and 15% reported suspending. The preschool expulsion rate was 27.42 per 1000 enrollees, more than 34 times the Massachusetts K-12 rate and more than 13 times the national K-12 rate. Suspension rates for preschoolers were less than that for K-12. Larger classes, higher proportion of 3-year-olds in the class, and elevated teacher job stress predicted increased likelihood of expulsion. Location in a school or Head Start and teachers' positive feelings of job satisfaction predicted decreased likelihood of expulsion. Expulsion was relatively rare in classes where both class size and teacher job stress were low. A higher proportion of Latino children in the class and lower teacher job satisfaction predicted an increased likelihood of suspension. Implications are discussed regarding policy, prevention, and future research.
http://journals.lww.com/iycjournal/...d_Child_Care_Expulsion_and_Suspension_.7.aspx

New government data reveals racial disparities in schools extend even to pre-school. “It is clear that the United States has a great distance to go to meet our goal of providing opportunities for every student to succeed,” Secretary of Education Arne Duncan says

Black students in American public schools aresignificantly more likely than white students to be suspended and the racial disparity begins even as early as preschool, according to a new government report.
MORE

NYC Schools Abandon $95 Million Controversial Computer ProgramColumbia University Charging Student Group $1,500 After Anti-Rape ProtestIt's Official: Pelosi Remains House Democratic Leader NBC NewsDeep Freeze: All 50 States Face Winter Whack NBC NewsAdrian Peterson Suspended for Season Without Pay NBC News
The data released Friday by the Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights portrays significant racial disparities that persist across the public education system. Black students, for instance, represent just 18 percent of preschool enrollment but 42 percent of the students who are suspended once. Only about 60 percent of public school districts offer some form of preschool.
“It is clear that the United States has a great distance to go to meet our goal of providing opportunities for every student to succeed,” Secretary of Education Arne Duncan said in a statement.
The report notes that suspended students are more likely to be suspended again and less likely to graduate.
http://time.com/33514/report-black-preschoolers-suspended-more-than-whites/
 
The vaccines aren't safe for anyone regardless of their race

If you trust big pharma companies like BAYER who knowingly sold products they knew were infected with HIV then frankly you are incredibly naive

If you trust your government who is bought and paid for by the big corporations then you are beyond naive

http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/201...-us-citizens-will-this-year-be-any-different/

[h=1]Last Year’s Flu Vaccine Killed and Injured Over 93,000 US Citizens – Will This Year be Any Different?[/h] Posted by: TLB Staff

By TLB Staff Writer: Christina England
Whilst governments around the world maximize their flu vaccine targets for this year, pushing the vaccine onto younger and younger children, last year two sets of parents were left wishing they had ignored their advice.
[h=3]Story # 1 – Nine Year Old Marysue Left Visually Impaired and Paralyzed[/h] Marysue was a happy, healthy little girl, who loved nothing more than to run and play and sing in the church choir. Four days after receiving last year’s routine flu vaccine however, she was left visually impaired, totally paralyzed and needing 24 hour a day nursing care from her family.
Nine year old Marysue, from Tampa, Florida, received her flu vaccination on November 21st 2013 and within days was left fighting for her life in hospital.
[h=3]10 News stated:[/h] “Four days after getting the vaccine, Marysue fell ill with a rare viral infection of the brain called Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (ADEM).”
Director of Infectious Diseases Dr. Juan Dumois, from the All Children’s Hospital told reporters that:
“Developing the illness, for which there is no way to predict or prevent, from a flu shot happens.” (own emphasis)
After his somewhat flippant remark, he then tried to backtrack by saying that he still recommended that children receive the flu vaccine because ADEM can also be contracted by catching the flu and stated:
“If I get the flu I’m far more likely to get ADEM than from the flu vaccine.” [1]
However, despite Dr. Dumois’s reassurances, Marysue’s parents remain unconvinced, saying that they believe the vaccine was responsible for their daughter’s serious health problems.
[h=3]Marysue’s Parents Tell Their Version of the Story on Fund Raising Website[/h] Telling her story on a gofundme campaign, set up to raise enough money for a new bedroom for her daughter that is large enough to accommodate a hospital bed, Marysue’s mother tells of the day her daughter received the flu shot and the events that followed.
[h=3]She wrote:[/h] “On November 20, 2013, received her annual flu shot. Then, on the evening of November 25, 2013, she played freeze tag with her friends, ate her dinner and went to bed. Marysue was fine when her father and I turned in around ten that night. The next morning, she did not get up at six as she normally did. I went in to check on her. When I called her, she did not respond. I attempted to wake her and could not at first. Finally, she opened her eyes but she did not speak to me which was not normal for her.
I immediately called Stephen (her father). We called 911; they sent an ambulance. After they evaluated her, they told me to get in the ambulance. I had to ride in the front. I later found out that on the way to the hospital she had a seizure. Later, we were told that during the night she had a previous seizure with lack of oxygen.” [2]
Note: (Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is characterized by a brief but widespread attack of inflammation in the brain and spinal cord that damages myelin – the protective covering of nerve fibers. Although it can be caused by a viral or bacterial infection, vaccinations are also a known cause.) [3]
Their ongoing campaign has managed to raise nearly $12,000 from people touched by her tragic story but in reality their kind donations are just a drop in the ocean compared with the figure Marysue’s parents need, to redesign their house and buy their daughter a van large enough to accommodate her wheelchair.
[h=3]Story # 2 – Healthy Nineteen Year Old Killed By the Flu Shot[/h] Marysue, was not the only child to suffer devastating adverse reactions from the Flu vaccine last year. A healthy, active nineteen year old male from Utah, was also reported to have had a severe adverse reaction from the vaccine.
Chandler Webb had his whole life ahead of him the day that he was vaccinated with his first ever flu vaccination. Lori Webb, Chandler’s mother, told Fox News that the day after he received the vaccine, he became severely ill, suffering from severe headaches, shaking and vomiting. Fearing the worse, she immediately took her son to Salt Lake Hospital where he fell into a coma.
Sadly, Chandler never recovered from the coma and 28 days later a decision was made to turn off his life support.
His mother says that she has been left in no doubt that the flu vaccine was responsible for Chandler’s death and made the following statement to Fox News:
“He was so healthy. He was pure. He should have been able to fight the flu. I wish he would have gotten the flu rather than this vaccination.” [4]
Once again health officials told the public that it was unlikely the flu vaccine was responsible for Chandler’s death and emphasized that the flu vaccine was safe.
However, despite health officials everywhere burying their heads in the sand and ignoring the facts, Chandler was just one of 1,080 flu vaccine deaths reported last year.
[h=3]At Least 93,000 Adverse Reactions Reported Last Year[/h] According to the National Vaccine Information Center (NIVC), the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) received a massive 93,000 reports of adverse reactions following last year’s flu vaccine. These included 1,080 deaths and 8,888 hospitalizations.
[h=3]NIVC stated:[/h] “As of November 2013, there have been more than 93,000 reports of reactions, hospitalizations, injuries and deaths following influenza vaccinations made to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), including 1,080 related deaths, 8,888 hospitalizations, 1,801 related disabilities and over 1,700 cases of GBS. In 2013 the Federal Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) voted to add GBS to the Vaccine Injury Table within the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). [5]
It is only when you take into consideration that these figures only represent the adverse reactions reported in the US, can you even begin to appreciate the true extent of the problem.
[h=3]Conclusion[/h] At this time of year there are advertisements on the flu vaccine just about everywhere you go and yet despite many doctors and health officials insisting that the flu vaccines are safe and effective, reports from around the World tell a different story.
Before parents decide to have their child vaccinated with years flu vaccination, they should ask themselves whether or not this particular vaccine is worth the risk.
[h=3]References[/h] 1. http://www.wtsp.com/story/news/local/2014/10/30/mom-daughter-paralyzed-because-of-flu-shot/18218703/
2. http://www.gofundme.com/g5lbzg
3.http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/acute_encephalomyelitis/acute_encephalomyelitis.htm
4. http://www.foxnews.com/health/2013/11/25/mother-claims-flu-shot-killed-her-teenage-son/
5. http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/Influenza.aspx
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~​
About the author:​
Christina was born and educated in London, U.K. In 1978, Christina changed her career path to dedicate her time to caring for the elderly and was awarded the title of Care Giver of the Year for her work with the elderly in 1980. For the last decade, Christina England has been investigating the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Her articles have had over 500,000 hits and she is now known worldwide for her groundbreaking journalism work.
Christina also has created a world first online resource for parents who have lost their children after vaccine injuries
parentsandcarersagainstinjustice.weebly.com/
 
The morality of some group in no way speaks to the actions they take. That is a logical fallacy. That is literally assuming that someone did something based on your schema of what they are. Otherwise known as stereotyping or prejudice. The only relevant part is the part that you said they are damaging peoples health. From their you can see if they are doing it for profit, and from that you can say that they are criminal or lying. It is logically wrong to go in the reverse here which is exactly what you are doing. You assuming they are criminal, so then you say they are damaging peoples health and you rationalize the action to say they are doing it for profit. Then you try to convince yourself your right by looking ONLY at the reports that say it is damaging, and you don't even consider the possibility that you are wrong because you know that if you are wrong you would have to reassess your own standing on your own conspiracy theory. This is called confirmation bias. That is why you are using faulty studies and false logic to supposedly "prove" that it is harmful. You then justify the fact that they are faulty studies by saying that the conspiracy is manipulating all the other results so only the faulty ones can be correct. That's why you think you can just dismiss what I'm saying, but that's literally false.

Seriously muir, a conspiracy of all the researchers and doctors in most of the scientific community to hide this truth of death, even though there has NOT been any such pattern of death for the basically full generation that your conspiracy has been supposedly acting. You obviously don't know researchers and scientists and doctors. Most of them are moral, and if they so chose, you would have a lot of information getting out. It actually makes more sense that the few supposed leaks are from crack pots, not a conspiracy. You couldn't keep such a lid even if you tried. To many moving pieces. That's partially why I don't agree with your supposed conspiracy. Now I'm willing to debate with you on the facts of the matter, for example the effects of vaccines, but when you start saying that the proof that they are poisoning us is that the conspiracy has done nasty things in the past therefore they are doing something nasty now, that is beyond illogical. That's beyond confirmation bias to tunnel vision. Its literally wrong, you can't make such a proof like that!
For example, do you remember your "idea" about cancer really being caused by a fungus and that its treatable with sodium bicarbonate? I mean seriously, its completely ridiculous! And only one doctor thought that. But because it fit in with your conspiracy, you defended and argued it whole heartedly, skewing information and facts to suit your needs without even vaguely considering the alternative. It was literally wrong, lol. And so is your idea that the supposed criminality of the government in some way proves that vaccines are poisoning us. In my most generous attitude (and without looking at medical facts and actual biology) the most I could say about your proof is that it says that it could be, not that it is. Then when you look at the medical facts and biology, you realize that it certainly couldn't be.
.
 
http://www.globalresearch.ca/is-the...ly-sterilize-women-all-over-the-globe/5413599

[h=2]Is the WHO Using Vaccines to Secretly Sterilize Women All Over the Globe?[/h] By Michael Snyder
Global Research, November 12, 2014
End of the American Dream 11 November 2014


n some areas of the world, purposely cutting off someone’s family line is considered to be one of the most wicked things that you can possibly do. But that appears to be precisely what the United Nations is doing. Two UN organizations, the WHO and UNICEF, have just been caught red-handed administering “tetanus vaccines” laced with sterilizing agents to girls and women in Kenya. And as you will see below, this is not the first time that this has happened. Apparently there is a well-coordinated international program to use vaccines to secretly sterilize women in poor countries all over the planet. The United States needs to immediately demand a full investigation of the UN vaccine program, but I wouldn’t count on that ever happening under the Obama administration. There have always been anecdotal stories of women all over the globe being unable to have children after receiving UN vaccines. But now we have scientific proof. Lab tests that were recently conducted found an antigen that causes miscarriages in the vaccines that were being given to girls and women in Kenya. A story that was posted on Life Site News about this caused shockwaves all over the Internet. The following is an excerpt from that report…
Kenya’s Catholic bishops are charging two United Nations organizations with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus inoculation program sponsored by the Kenyan government.
According to a statement released Tuesday by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, the organization has found an antigen that causes miscarriages in a vaccine being administered to 2.3 million girls and women by the World Health Organization and UNICEF. Priests throughout Kenya reportedly are advising their congregations to refuse the vaccine.
“We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen,” Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi told LifeSiteNews. “They were all laced with HCG.”
So exactly what is HCG?
The following is how Natural News described what it does…
HCG is a chemical developed by the World Health Organization for sterilization purposes. When injected into the body of a young woman, it causes a pregnancy to be destroyed by the body’s own antibody response to the HCG,resulting in a spontaneous abortion. Its effectiveness lasts for years, causing abortions in women up to three years after the injections.
This is an absolutely horrifying scandal, but the mainstream media is totally ignoring it.
Perhaps that is because they agree with what the United Nations is trying to do.
And should we actually be surprised at what the UN is doing? After all, the UN has publicly declared in writing that it intends to reduce population growth in Kenya
The United Nations and its oftentimes barbaric population-control apparatus are under fire again after releasing a deeply controversial report claiming that the African population of Kenya is too large and growing too quickly. To deal with the supposed “challenge,” as the UN and its “partners” in the national government put it, international bureaucrats are demanding stepped up efforts to brainwash Kenyan women into wanting fewer children. Also on the agenda: more taxpayer-funded “family-planning” and “reproductive-health” schemes to reduce the number of Africans to levels considered “desirable” by the UN.
Critics promptly lambasted the plot as undisguised eugenics, with some experts calling it a true example of the “war on women.” Among other concerns, analysts outraged by the report noted that the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) and the establishment’s fiendish efforts to slash human populations — especially those considered “undesirable” by self-appointed guardians of the gene pool — have a long and sordid history going back decades. Today, the agenda marches on, as illustrated in the latest UN report calling for drastically reduced numbers of Kenyans.
When very evil people tell you that they intend to do something, you should take them very seriously.
And without a doubt, the UN is evil. To use vaccines to secretly sterilize women against their will is almost too wicked to describe with words.
But the UN will keep doing this until we demand that they stop. Back in the 1990s, similar sterilization campaigns using tetanus vaccines were being conducted in Nicaragua, Mexico and the Philippines. The following comes from thinktwice.com
Here are the known facts concerning the tetanus vaccination campaigns in Mexico and the Philippines:
* Only women are vaccinated, and only the women between the ages of 15 and 45. (In Nicaragua the age range was 12-49.) But aren’t men at least as likely as young women to come into contact with tetanus? And what of the children? Why are they excluded?
* Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) hormone has been found in the vaccines. It does not belong there — in the parlance of the O.J. Simpson murder trial, the vaccine has been “contaminated.”
* The vaccination protocols call for multiple injections — three within three months and a total of five altogether. But, since tetanus vaccinations provide protection for ten years or more, why are multiple inoculations called for?(3)
* WHO has been actively involved for more than 20 years in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG tied to tetanus toxoid as a carrier — the exact same coupling as has been found in the Mexican-Philippine-Nicaragua vaccines.(4)
And these are just the incidents that we know about.
I think that it would be safe to say that wherever the UN is vaccinating people for tetanus all over the world there are probably sterilizing agents in those vaccines.
Meanwhile, the UN continues to pour money into other global sterilization methods.
For example, the UN has dedicated massive amounts of resources to supporting the “one-child policy” in China.
And in India, UN money is often used to provide financial incentives to women to volunteer for sterilization.
At this point, approximately 37 percent of all married women in the nation of India have been sterilized. That is an absolutely astounding number. In fact, it is so astounding that I could hardly believe it when I first saw it.
But it is actually true.
And these procedures are often not conducted safely. In fact, one recent mass sterilization campaign resulted in the deaths of ten women
Ten women have died in India and dozens more are in hospital, many in a critical condition after a state-run mass sterilisation, a local official said Tuesday.
Many of the more than 80 women who underwent sterilisation at the free government-run camp in the central state of Chhattisgarh on Saturday fell ill shortly afterwards, the official told AFP.
Of course the United States is not exactly innocent in all of this. These UN organizations are absolutely showered with money by the Obama administration, and the U.S. government even has an “Office of Population Affairs” that is used to promote population control all across the planet.
Those involved in these efforts actually believe that they are doing the right thing. They are convinced that “climate change” is the number one problem that humanity is facing today and that the number one way to fight “climate change” is to reduce the number of people.
So they believe that they are actually “saving the world” by pushing a population control agenda.
For much, much more on all of this, please see the following articles…
-“The Population Control Agenda Is Being Relentlessly Pushed In American Public Schools
-“From 7 Billion People To 500 Million People – The Sick Population Control Agenda Of The Global Elite
-“Al Gore, Agenda 21 And Population Control
-“Governments Around The World Are Eagerly Adopting The Strict Population Control Agenda Of The United Nations
-“Yes, They Really Do Want To Reduce The Population – 22 Shocking Population Control Quotes From The Global Elite That Will Make You Want To Lose Your Lunch
Now that the wicked actions of the UN in Kenya have been exposed, UN officials are going to closely watch how people respond.
If there is little outrage, they will just keep on secretly sterilizing women.
That is why it is absolutely imperative that we scream bloody murder about all of this. Great evil is being committed right in front of our eyes, and those with courage need to stand up and say that enough is enough.
 
http://www.thenewamerican.com/world...-un-vaccines-in-kenya-used-to-sterilize-women

Monday, 10 November 2014 [h=2]Doctors: UN Vaccines in Kenya Used to Sterilize Women[/h] Written by Alex Newman

Less than a year after the United Nations unveiled a sweeping population-control plot aimed at reducing the number of people in Kenya, a supposed UN “vaccine program” is under fire by doctors and Catholic bishops for deliberately sterilizing millions of women. The explosive revelations were released after medical researchers and the Catholic Church found a sterilization agent in tetanus inoculations being foisted on Kenyan women by two UN agencies in cooperation with the national government. Incredibly, it is not the first time that international vaccine campaigns by the UN targeting Third World populations have been exposed as covert sterilization and eugenics programs. Some critics have even referred to the latest plot as race-based genocide.
In a statement released last week by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, the medical organization said it had ordered laboratory tests of tetanus vaccines being administered in Kenya by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the UN Children’s Fund (UNICEF). “The unfortunate truth is that the vaccine was laced with [sterilizing agent Human Chorionic Gonadotropin] HCG just like the one used in the South American cases,” Dr. Wahome Ngare said in a statement for the Catholic doctors group that helped expose the scheme after the test results came back positive. “Further, none of the girls and women given the vaccination were informed of its contraceptive effect.”
According to the organization and other medical experts, the hCG found in the UN tetanus vaccines causes women’s bodies to develop an immune response to attack the hormone, which is essential to pregnancy. So, when a woman who has received the UN shots gets pregnant, her body fights the crucial hCG — resulting in the death of the unborn child in the womb. Eventually, the supposed inoculations — pushed on Kenyan women by the UN under the guise of "preventing neo-natal tetanus" — result in permanent sterility after multiple doses. All six UN vaccine samples collected from around Kenya tested positive for the hCG antigen at independent laboratories, researchers said.


“This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine,” explained Dr. Ngare, the spokesman for the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, which supports and administers vaccinations — as long as they are not laced with sterilization agents. “This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored.”
On November 6, the Kenya Conference of Catholic Bishops released a statement signed by all 27 bishops confirming the findings. “The Catholic Church struggled and acquired several vials of the vaccine, which we sent to four unrelated Government and private laboratories in Kenya and abroad,” the conference said. “We want to announce here, that all the tests showed that the vaccine used in Kenya in March and October 2014 was indeed laced with the Beta-HCG hormone.” The bishops raised concerns about the secretive UN eugenics program masquerading as a vaccination scheme as early as March of this year, but received no cooperation from authorities.
Based on the information and findings, the Catholic Bishops of Kenya said they were “shocked at the level of dishonesty and casual manner in which such a serious issue is being handled by the Government.” The bishops said a report by the Health Ministry claiming the vaccines were free of hCG was a “false” and “deliberate attempt to distort the truth and mislead 42 million Kenyans.” The Catholic leaders also noted that they were dismayed by attempts to “blackmail and intimidate” medical professionals who corroborated the facts about the dangerous vaccine.
“We commend and support all professionals who have stood by the truth,” the bishops added in the statement. “We shall not waver in calling upon all Kenyans to avoid the tetanus vaccination campaign laced with Beta-HCG, because we are convinced that it is indeed a disguised population control programme.” The Catholic Church in Kenya is not opposed to vaccines and, in fact, operates a massive public-health network across the country that provides clean vaccines to Kenyans who request them.
Dr. Ngare, a gynecologist and obstetrician, asked that Kenyans become educated and activated in response to the ongoing atrocities. “Though the Bishops are medically lay people, they have technical advisory teams of competent specialists from every discipline, including medicine,” he said in the statement. “These teams are both local and international as the Catholic Church is global. The Catholic based and run health institutions form the largest private health network in the country and have been rendering medical services to Kenyans for over 100 years! Thus, when the Bishops speak on topical issue like the tetanus vaccination, they are talking from a point of knowledge and authority. It would be foolhardy to disregard their advice.”
“We have performed our moral and civic duty of speaking the truth and alerting the government and the people of Kenya,” Dr. Ngare concluded. “It is now up to each individual Kenyan to make an informed choice.” Multiple critics said Americans must do more to rein in the dangerous and barbaric UN eugenics scheming as well. Other organizations also confirmed that the UN vaccines were indeed being used to sterilize Kenyan women without informing them.
The U.S.-based Center for Family and Human Rights, among other groups, blasted the UN program, calling for congressional investigations in the United States into the plot. It is especially relevant to Americans because U.S. taxpayers fund the UN agencies involved, and because “partners” of the organization include the federal government’s U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) and population-control zealot Bill Gates, who openly talked about how vaccines could be used to reduce the population.
“The U.S. funds UNICEF and WHO programs with hundreds of millions of dollars annually. A congressional investigation should be launched to discover the origination of these manipulated vaccines,” explained Lisa Correnti at C-Fam, adding that any “tetanus” campaign featuring involvement of population-control agencies and “philanthropists” should always draw oversight. “Did USAIDs Population and Reproductive Health personnel have knowledge of the program? Unethical and deceptive practices such as this bring further distrust from the vulnerable women and children that desperately need holistic medical care.”
Unfortunately, the explosive findings about UN population-control schemes are not new. The UN’s self-styled global “health” agency, the WHO, discovered the sterilization-via-vaccine method more than two decades ago. Essentially, it added hCG to vaccines, which resulted in abortion and sterilization among vaccinated women. The UN body fully understood the consequences. Yet, shortly after the discovery, the WHO unleashed a massive sterilization and eugenics program concealed behind a “vaccination” scheme targeting women of child-bearing age in the Philippines, Nicaragua, and Mexico. Now, in line with UN demands for less Africans on the planet, Kenya has become the latest victim.
The news is also not surprising. As The New American reported in January, the UN Population Fund (UNFPA), which has previously been exposed helping the Communist Chinese regime perpetrate forced abortions as part of its savage “one-child policy,” had recently released a report calling for massive population reduction in Kenya. While the UN report never specifically called for a secret forced sterilization campaign outright, it did outline a wide array of population-control plots aimed at reducing the fertility of Kenyan women to 2.6 children per woman by 2030.
Separately, the Catholic bishops, citing previous UN “vaccine” schemes to sterilize women, warned about the tetanus-inoculation plot as early as March. “Information in the public domain indicates that Tetanus Toxoid vaccine (TT) laced with Beta human chorionic gonadotropin (b-HCG) sub unit has been used in Philippines, Nicaragua and Mexico to vaccinate women against future pregnancy,” Kenya’s bishops said in a statement at the time. “Beta HCG sub unit is a hormone necessary for pregnancy.”
“When injected as a vaccine to a non-pregnant woman, this Beta HCG sub unit combined with tetanus toxoid develops antibodies against tetanus and HCG so that if a woman’s egg becomes fertilized, her own natural HCG will be destroyed rendering her permanently infertile,” the bishops continued. “In this situation tetanus vaccination has been used as a birth control method. The ongoing tetanus vaccination campaign bears the hallmarks of the programmes that were carried out in Philippines, Mexico and Nicaragua.” That statement was released before lab tests confirmed the plot.
Outside of Kenya, the establishment press has virtually ignored the Earth-shattering accusations leveled at the UN. On the other hand, the news sent shockwaves through the alternative media after a report in LifeSiteNews.com highlighted the findings. UNICEF and WHO in Kenya were not immediately available for comment.
The amount of suffering and horror unleashed by the UN in Kenya is impossible to calculate. Millions of families will be potentially affected for generations. Americans must demand that Congress stop funding the UN and especially its coercive population-reduction apparatus. Making the American people unwitting accomplices in the crimes of eugenics and mass involuntary sterilization campaigns is unconstitutional, horrifying, and deeply immoral.

Alex Newman, a foreign correspondent for The New American, is normally based in Europe. Follow him on Twitter @ALEXNEWMAN_JOU. He can be reached at
anewman@thenewamerican.com

Related articles:
UN Unveils Plot to Reduce African Population
UN Women Pushes Global Abortion for “Sustainable Population”
UN Slammed for Its Forced Abortions in China Using U.S. Funds
Study: Global One-child Policy Not Enough for “Sustainability”
Carbon Scam by UN and World Bank Behind “Genocidal” Land Grabs
Gates Foundation Pushing Dangerous Contraceptives on Black Populations
Obama’s “Ebola Czar” Thinks Overpopulation Is Top Challenge
Climate Alarmists Push Chinese Communism, Population Control
U.S. & U.K. Taxpayers Funding Forced Sterilization in India
UN Pushes Population Control Agenda
U.S. Government Funds Rwandan Sterilization Campaign
Global ObamaCare and World Population Control
Seven Billion Milestone a Blessing Says Population Expert
Before Rio+20, Ted Turner Says Ban Plastic, Use UN to Slash Population
Science Group: UN Rio+20 Summit Must Reduce Global Population
Catholic Show Exposes Rockefeller Assault on Church, Life
"Maafa 21" Exposes Black Genocide
Pro-Life Billboards Highlight Eugenics
EU, World Bank Brutalize Africans for “Carbon Credits”
Global ObamaCare & the “Good Club” Billionaires
 
.
I am really concerned about the spreading of misinformation on the web. Since I don't have a lot of time to do my own research or write my own articles I will post an article that tries to appeal to those who think there is something awfully unreasonable and suspicious about the anti-vaccine propaganda, how they distort the truth for their own version of the truth. It seems that the squeaky wheel often gets the grease and those who are vehemently opposed to vaccinations are terribly squeaky. This does not make their statements true.

http://www.sciencebasedmedicine.org/toxic-myths-about-vaccines/

Toxic myths about vaccines
Posted by David Gorski on February 18, 2008

Ever since there have been vaccines, there has been an antivaccination movement. It began shortly after Edward Jenner discovered how to use the weaker cowpox virus to induce long-lasting immunity to smallpox, there has been resistance to the concept of vaccination, a resistance that continues to this very day. Reasons for this resistance have ranged from religious, to fear of injecting foreign substances, to simple resistance to the government telling people what to do. Some fear even the infitessimally small risk that vaccines pose for the benefit of resistance to disease far more than they fear the diseases themselves, a result of the very success of modern vaccines. Of course, vaccines, like any other medical intervention, are not without risks, making it easy for them to jump on any hint of harm done by vaccines, whether real or imagined, even though vaccines are among the very safest of treatments.

One of the biggest myths that antivaccinationists believe and like to use to stoke the fear of vaccines is the concept that they are full of “toxins.” The myth that mercury in the thimerosal preservative commonly used in vaccines in the U.S. until early 2002 was a major cause of autism is simply the most recent bogeyman used to try to argue that vaccines do more harm than good, as was the scare campaign engineered in response to Andrew Wakefield’s poor science claiming a link between the MMR vaccine and autism. Now that study after study have failed to find or corroborate a link between thimerosal in vaccines or vaccines in general and autism to the point where even the most zealous of zealots are having a hard time defending the claim that mercury in vaccines cause autism any more, predictably the campaign against vaccines has fallen back on the old “toxins” myth. If you peruse antivaccinationist websites, it won’t take long to find articles claiming that vaccines are full of the most terrifying and nasty toxins. Examples in the media abound as well. For example, Jenny McCarthy, comic actress and former Playboy Playmate who has been doing the talk show and publicity circuit lately to plug her book in which she claims that vaccines caused her son’s autism and that she was able to cure it with “biomedical” interventions and diet, recently gave an interview in which she said:

What I really am is “anti-toxins” in the vaccines. I do believe that there is a correlation between vaccinations and autism. I don’t think it’s the sole cause, but I think they’re triggering—it’s triggering—autism in these kids. A really great example is…is, sometimes obesity can trigger diabetes. I do believe that vaccines can trigger autism…It’s so much more than just mercury. That is one ingredient in the recipe of autism…I’m talking about all of them. I’m calling for cleaning out the toxins. People don’t realize that there is aluminum, ether, antifreeze, still mercury, in the shots…People are afraid of secondhand smoke, but they’re OK with injecting the second worst neurotoxin on the planet in newborns.

Another example of what I sometimes call the “toxin gambit” comes from Deirdre Imus, wife of shock jock Don Imus, with both husband and wife being well-known and reliable media boosters of the claim that vaccines somehow cause autism:

So, where are the evidenced based (conflict free) studies that prove the safety of these “trace” amounts and proof that there are “no biological effects” of any amount of mercury being injected into our children and pregnant moms? Also, where are the evidence based studies proving the safety of vaccines given to pregnant moms and our children that contain other toxins such as aluminum and formaldehyde?

The most recent example of this tactic comes from an organization called Generation Rescue, which just last week ran a full-page ad in USA Today, paid for in part by Jenny McCarthy and her present boyfriend Jim Carrey:

antivaxgradvertisement.jpg

Besides being one of the most egregious examples of a post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy that I’ve ever seen from an antivaccination site, this Generation Rescue ad demonstrates clearly a new strategy (or, more properly, a resurrection of an old technique) now that science is coming down conclusively against mercury in vaccines as a cause of autism, a strategy of propagating fear by linking vaccines with “toxins.” So what’s the real story? Are there really deadly toxins in vaccines that parents should be worried about?

To answer this question, I thought I’d use what to me is arguably the most amazingly over-the-top examples of this strategy of listing “toxins” in vaccines as a jumping off point. This example is embodied in a post by one Kent Heckenlively writing for the Age of Autism blog entitled FDA Says A-OK: Vaccine Ingredients from A to Z. This post examines a list taken straight from the CDC website of ingredients found in vaccines besides the bacterial or viral proteins designed to evoke the protective immune response and tries to scare parents about almost every one. Of course, nearly all of these comparisons fail to acknowledge that time-honored pharmacological principle that “the dose makes the poison” and extrapolate horrible consequences known to occur during prolonged exposure or exposure to large amounts to the tiny amounts in vaccines. That’s exactly what Mr. Heckenlively does to what is, I must say, a truly ridiculous level. However, as patently ridiculous as Mr. Heckenlively’s post is, I believe that it is not a straw man and still worth starting the discussion with because it serves almost as a reductio ad absurdum concentration of actual arguments that antivaccinationists make about “toxins” in vaccines. A few examples, starting with these, will readily show you what I mean:

Neomycin is used as an anti-bacterial. It is also nephrotoxic and can cause kidney damage.

And:

Polymyxin B is used as an anti-bacterial. It binds to the cell membrane and alters its structure, making it more permeable. The resulting water uptake leads to cell death. Side effects include neurotoxicity and acute renal tubular necrosis.

And:

Streptomycin is used as an anti-bacterial. Streptomycin stops bacterial growth by damaging cell membranes and inhibiting protein synthesis. Specifically, it binds to the 16S rRNA of the bacterial ribosome, interfering with the binding of formyl-methionyl-tRNA to the 30S subunit. This prevents initiation of protein synthesis. Humans have structurally different ribosomes from bacteria, thereby allowing the selectivity of this antibiotic for bacteria. Streptomycin cannot be given orally, but must be administered by regular intramuscular injection. An adverse effect of this medicine is oto-toxicity. It can result in permanent hearing loss.

All of this is true but highly deceptive. Why? The recommended dosage of streptomycin for the treatment of various infections is 20-40 mg/kg per day, for a maximum of 1 g per day! Why is this relevant? Because every vaccine given to a child during his entire life probably doesn’t even come anywhere near 1 mg, that’s why. Antibiotics like streptomycin and neomycin are used in cell culture medium at low concentrations to suppress the growth of bacteria. The reason that these antibiotics are listed is because they’re used in culturing the cells necessary to grow the viruses used in making vaccines. By the time the vaccine is made, these antibiotics are only present in trace amounts, nowhere near enough to cause renal toxicity or ototoxicity, which only occurs with use at or above the range of the doses listed above. I suspect that Mr. Heckenlively knows this too but only mentions it because he knows it will scare parents. Indeed, he takes this sort of distortion to a truly comical extreme with this example:

Sucrose is used as a stabilizer. Over-consumption of sucrose has been linked with some adverse health effects. The most common is dental caries or tooth decay, in which oral bacteria convert sugars (including sucrose) from food into acids that attack tooth enamel. When a large amount of foods that contain a high percentage of sucrose is consumed, beneficial nutrients can be displaced from the diet, which can contribute to an increased risk for chronic disease. It has been suggested that sucrose-containing drinks may be linked to the development of obesity and insulin resistance.

Does Heckenlively honestly think that the baby is eating the vaccine or that there’s kilogram upon kilogram of sucrose in vaccines? Using Mr. Heckenlively’s logic, I could say that because there’s the chelation agent EDTA used in some vaccines as a preservative babies could use it as a treatment for heavy metal poisoning. Sadly, Mr. Heckenlively is not alone in using such distortions to attack vaccines. For example, here are some even more deceptive statements on other such antivaccinationist lists as well about other vaccine ingredients:

Sodium Hydroxide (also known as lye, caustic soda, soda lye.) Is corrosive and is an Eye, skin and respiratory irritant. Can burn eyes, skin and internal organs. Can cause lung and tissue damage, blindness and can be fatal if swallowed. Found in oven cleaners, tub and tile cleaners, toilet bowl cleaners and drain openers.

And:

Hydrochloric acid: CAN DISTROY TISSUE UPON DIRECT CONTACT! Found in aluminum cleaners and rust removers.

Neglected is the simple chemical observation that these effects depend upon the pH of these acids and bases. The reason they’re used in vaccines is to adjust the pH of the vaccine to neutral. The person who wrote these things clearly doesn’t understand the basic concept of pH. Does she honestly think that the pH of vaccines is either 0 (very acid) or 14 (very basic)? Moreover, sodium hydroxide, when it neutralizes an aqueous acid solution will simply form the sodium salt of whatever the anion was in the acid. Hydrochloric acid will form the chloride salt with whatever cation was in the base. When sodium hydroxide or hydrochloric acid are used, one to neutralize the other, the result is an NaCl solution of neutral pH: common table salt.

Of course, this list does contain a number of chemicals that do sound really scary. However, if you remember the pharmacological principle that “the dose makes the poison,” they are much less so. These chemicals are all present at extremely low concentrations in vaccines, certainly not at any dangerous levels. Moreover, some of the fearmongering about such seemingly scary toxins betrays a serious lack of understanding of basic chemistry.

Here’s one example. The aforementioned Jenny McCarthy has been repeating that there is “antifreeze” in vaccines, as she did in the interview linked to earlier. That line is straight off of a number of antivaccination websites. (Amazingly Mr. Heckenlively managed to restrain himself from repeating “the “antifreeze in vaccines” gambit. I can only hope that it is due to intellectual honesty, although I can’t rule out the possibility that he just didn’t know about it.) One website in particular links to an MSDS about Quaker State Antifreeze/Coolant, the principal ingredients of which are ethylene glycol and diethylene glycol. Guess what? There’s no ethylene or diethylene glycol in vaccines. Accurate chemistry or pharmacology never was a major concern among antivaccinationists. After all, Jenny McCarthy also says that there’s “ether” in vaccines, too. The only “ether” I could find in the CDC’s list is polyethylene glycol pisooctylphenyl ether (Triton X-100), a common detergent agent used to make cell membranes permeable. In the past, a compound called Tween-Ether was sometimes used instead of Triton X-100; it’s the same sort of thing, a fairly large organic molecule with an ether chemical group hooked on. I suspect that Jenny and most antivaccinationists are too chemistry-challenged to realize that this is not the same thing as diethyl ether, which was used as an anaesthetic agent before safer volatile agents were developed and is often commonly referred to as just “ether.” Jenny also apparently doesn’t realize that ether is not very soluble in aqueous solution. The only way I could even conceive ether being used in the vaccine manufacturing process is if it’s used for a chemical extraction, in which case, it too would be present in at best trace amounts. Moreover, this may even be one source of the claim that antifreeze is in vaccines as well. Note the first part of the chemical name: “polyethylene glycol.” It just so turns out that a major component of many antifreezes is the chemical ethylene glycol.

I also suspect that the whole “antifreeze in vaccines” canard may have derived from a claim that ethylene glycol is used in the synthesis of thimerosal. In actuality, it’s synthesized using ethyl mercuric chloride, thiosalicylic acid, sodium hydroxide and ethanol, although I don’t know if there are other methods of synthesis that do involve ethylene glycol. The origin of this claim could also come from other trace chemicals in vaccines as well, such as propylene glycol. Either way, even if there were ethylene glycol in vaccines, it would not be at a concentration anywhere near high enough to be toxic or dangerous.

Because mercury hasn’t been in most childhood vaccines for six years, one of the two most favored ingredients that antivaccinationists now like to cite is formaldehyde. Yes, that is indeed the same chemical that’s used to fix tissue for pathology (usually as a 10% solution known as formalin that contains 10 g/100 ml of formaldehyde and is buffered to a neutral pH) and the same chemical used in the embalming fluid for the cadavers we dissected as medical students. (Indeed, I still remember that smell, which was impossible to get rid of entirely during the months I took gross anatomy.) During the vaccine manufacturing process, it’s used to inactivate live virus, and traces do remain after manufacturing. Why on earth would those traces be allowed to remain? Remember again: The dose makes the poison. In trace amounts, formaldehyde is not dangerous. Also, it doesn’t last long in aqueous solution, such as vaccines. It breaks down to formic acid and carbon monoxide. Moreover, exposure to far more formaldehyde than any vaccine contains is ubiquitous in modern life. It’s in auto exhaust, and various substances found in virtually every household emit it:

Latex paint, fingernail hardener, and fingernail polish release a large amount of formaldehyde to the air. Plywood and particle board, as well as furniture and cabinets made from them, fiberglass products, new carpets, decorative laminates, and some permanent press fabrics give off a moderate amount of formaldehyde. Some paper products, such as grocery bags and paper towels, give off small amounts of formaldehyde. Because these products contain formaldehyde, you may also be exposed on the skin by touching or coming in direct contact with them. You may also be exposed to small amounts of formaldehyde in the food you eat. You are not likely to be exposed to formaldehyde in the water you drink because it does not last a long time in water.

Of course, given my background, it’s hard not to mention that every generation of medical students since time immemorial has been exposed to large amounts of formaldehyde. I’m not saying this is a good thing; personally I wish I could have avoided it, and it would be a good thing if we could decrease the average exposure to it while going about our activities of life. However, it’s a matter of perspective. Antivaccinationists rant about formaldehyde in vaccines and ignore a source that is orders of magnitude greater over the lifetimes of each and every one of us from childhood to old age: the environment.

Finally, now that thimerosal has been removed from nearly all childhood vaccines, the antivaccinationists needed to find another bogeyman in vaccines to demonize, and, given their fear of heavy metals and belief that chelation therapy to remove them can cure autism, the most obvious candidate was aluminum, which has been used as an adjuvant in many vaccines for over 80 years to increase the ability of antigens to provoke the desired immune response. It has become other of the top two chemicals that antivaccinationists like to cite to demonize vaccines. True, aluminum is not nearly as scary-sounding as mercury, but with mercury falling by the wayside, antivaccinationists are certainly trying very hard to make it so, which brings us back to Mr. Heckenlively’s post:

Aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, and aluminum potassium sulfate are all used as adjuvants to stimulate the immune system. Aluminum products found in commercial antiperspirants have been linked with breast cancer. A recent article published in the Journal of Inorganic Chemistry based on research from Keele University in England was trying to explain the “known, but unaccounted for, higher incidence of tumors in the upper outer quadrant of the breast.” They found that aluminum content was higher in the outer regions where there would be the highest density of antiperspirant. In discussing aluminum’s potential danger the report stated, “Aluminum is a metalloestrogen, it is genotoxic, is bound by DNA and has been shown to be carcinogenic. It is also a pro-oxidant and this unusual property might provide a mechanistic basis for any putative carcinogenicity. The confirmed presence of aluminum in breast tissue biopsies highlights its potential as a possible factor in the etiology of breast cancer.”

I can’t help but ask here: Applying an aluminum-based compound to one’s skin over the course of many, many years is related to some injections of aluminum-based adjuvants in vaccines exactly…how? Of course, the above claim is a total nonsequitur, but what about the frequent confident claims on antivaccination websites that aluminum causes Alzheimer’s disease and that by implication vaccines cause Alzheimer’s? This is a claim by well-known antivaccinationist Hugh Fudenberg, who is often quoted thusly:

According to Hugh Fudenberg, MD (http://members.aol.com/nitrf), the world’s leading immunogeneticist and 13th most quoted biologist of our times (nearly 850 papers in peer review journals), if an individual has had five consecutive flu shots between 1970 and 1980 (the years studied) his/her chances of getting Alzheimer’s Disease is ten times higher than if they had one, two or no shots. I asked Dr. Fudenberg why this was so and he said it was due to the mercury and aluminum that is in every flu shot (and most childhood shots). The gradual mercury and aluminum buildup in the brain causes cognitive dysfunction. Is that why Alzheimer’s is expected to quadruple? Notes: Recorded from Dr. Fudenberg’s speech at the NVIC International Vaccine Conference, Arlington, VA September, 1997. Quoted with permission. Alzheimer’s to quadruple statement is from John’s Hopkins Newsletter Nov 1998.

Not surprisingly, this claim is not supported by science. There’s no good evidence that the flu vaccine is associated with an increased incidence of Alzheimer’s. Indeed, on his personal blog, my co-blogger Steve Novella has nicely summarized the evidence regarding whether or not aluminum is involved in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease, concluding:

The evidence of aluminum and AD is mixed, without a clear direction. At present the best answer we have is that aluminum probably does not cause AD but appears to be playing some role, perhaps influencing severity. But even after 42 years, there remains a question mark next to these conclusions. We can rule out that aluminum is the single cause of AD, but whether or not it is an independent risk factor is a qualified “probably not.”

And, most importantly, Steve said this about how the science looking at whether aluminum causes Alzheimer’s disease or not is abused:

The mainstream scientific and patient or disease-oriented groups accurately reflect the above interpretation of the research. But the complexity of the results make it very easy to exploit for the purpose of fear-mongering. The notorious crank website, Rense.com, for example, cherry picks the evidence that suggests there is a correlation and piles it up to present a very distorted view of the issue. There will likely persist rumors, scare e-mails, and conspiracy websites promoting the idea that aluminum causes AD regardless of how the research progresses.

Now the antivaccinationists are climbing aboard the aluminum scare train as well because the scientific evidence is becoming so clear that their previous favorite bogeyman vaccine ingredient, thimerosal, is not associated with autism that even the die-hards are having a hard time arguing that it is anymore, particularly now that thimerosal is no longer present above trace amounts in most childhood vaccines. Consequently, they have no choice but to branch out to other scary-sounding ingredients in vaccines and invoking vague (and, conveniently enough, almost impossible to demonstrate) “environmental toxins” or risk becoming irrelevant.

One thing that you have to remember about resistance to vaccines by groups like Generation Rescue, SafeMinds, and others is that it is not scientific in nature. It is either due to an excessive reliance on anecdotes or confusing correlation with causation (usually with a distrust of science and medicine), or it is ideological in nature. No matter how many of the “toxins” scientists remove from vaccines, it will never be enough for Generation Rescue, Jenny McCarthy, or other antivaccinationists, because it’s all about the vaccines and the very concept of vaccination itself, not any individual ingredients in the vaccines. Antivaccinationists will never come to a point where they say, “OK, now I believe that all the toxins are gone and vaccines are safe.” They’ll either fixate on the viruses or the viral or bacterial antigens themselves, or they’ll make the claim that vaccines are made using “aborted fetuses” because some cell lines used to grow up virus stocks were derived from aborted fetuses 40 or more years ago. If every trace of formaldehyde, aluminum, or any other chemical with more than two syllables in its name were somehow to be removed from all vaccines, they would still be saying things like this:

It is the toxin, or germ, contained in the shot itself that causes the adverse affects on the immune system.

Dead-virus, or live-virus vaccine etc…who cares? The cultures for polio vaccines are grown in the kidney tissue of dead monkeys in third-world countries with little or no controls and the virulent pustule toxin is put in vaccines to be shot into you little kid’s arm. I wouldn’t go into a room where that putrid stuff is, let alone inject it into my blood stream! Would you?

Here’s an even more ridiculous example:

This DNA is from such organisms as various animals, animal/human viruses, fungi and bacteria. It has been documented that the injecting foreign DNA can cause it or some of it to be incorporated into the recipient’s DNA (see ‘Immunisation’ Against Diseases for Children). Remember, nature has not experienced such a direct invasion as this before, so can you be sure that it would have developed a way to protect your body against it?

That pretty much rules out any live attenuated virus vaccine for such an antivaccinationist, doesn’t it? Even worse is this:

The human blood is supposed to be, and traditionally was, sterile — no bacteria (or other organisms) present in it. That is not the case any more. Naturally this has a weakening effect on the immune system, apart from sometimes leading to severe bacterial infections.

No live bacteria is in a vaccine. It is possible, as with any injection, for vaccines to become contaminated with bacteria (which is one reason why preservatives like thimerosal were used for multidose vials, where reuse increases the risk of bacterial contamination), but that is not the intent. What is in vaccines are bacterial proteins, which contain the antigens necessary to provoke the desired immune response.

It would be fascinating to engage an antivaccinationist who makes the claim that he is not “antivaccine” but “antitoxin” or “pro-vaccine safety” in a discussion and ask him this hypothetical question: If formaldehyde, “antifreeze,” aluminum, thimerosal, and every chemical in vaccines circulating in all those lists on antivaccination websites that so frighten you were somehow absolutely removed from the standard childhood vaccines so that not a single molecular remained, would you then vaccinate your child? The only thing that would remain is buffeed salt water and the necessary antigens, be they killed virus or bacterial proteins, or whatever.

My guess is that nearly all antivaccinationists would say no, because it’s the “toxin” that makes vaccines work that really disturbs them, as the quotes above clearly demonstrate. Remember that when you see these lists circulating on antivaccinist websites. Remember, too, the principle that the dose makes the poison. Only then will you understand how toxic the myths about vaccines being peddled by antivaccinationists are.
 
http://www.timesofisrael.com/in-tech-to-make-ebola-vaccine-israeli-firm-was-there-first/

In tech to make Ebola vaccine, Israeli firm was there first

Tobacco plants may be key to treating the dread disease – and Israel’s CollPlant knows more about ‘tobacco treatments’ than anyone

By David Shamah October 13, 2014, 2:17 pm

Scientists around the world scrambling to find a treatment for Ebola are looking to the tobacco plant for assistance, as a vehicle to synthesize antibodies for a vaccine. And that means they are likely to be looking towards Israel’s CollPlant, a company that is a pioneer in the development of recombinant proteins using tobacco plants. Get the Start-Up Israel's daily newsletter
and never miss our top stories
Free Sign up!
While CollPlant is not involved with the development of Zmapp, the tobacco-synthesized “cocktail” being developed by several American companies that, so far, is the only Ebola treatment on the horizon, the Israeli company knows a great deal about large-scale production of human cells in tobacco plants, said Prof. Oded Shoseyov, founder and chief scientific officer of CollPlant. “We were the first company in the world to use tobacco plants to do large-scale manufacturing of human proteins, and to receive EU permission to market tobacco-synthesized human elements,” he told The Times of Israel in an interview.

Zmapp, according to its inventors, San Diego-based Leaf Bio and Mapp Biopharmaceutical, with assistance from Defyrus Inc. of Toronto, the US government and the Public Health Agency of Canada, “is composed of three humanized monoclonal antibodies manufactured in plants, specifically Nicotiana. It is an optimized cocktail combining the best components of” three antibodies. The antibodies bind to proteins on the Ebola virus, which triggers the immune system and destroys the germ.
Zmapp, according to its makers, was first identified as a possible treatment last January. It has since been used on several Ebola victims in Liberia, with mixed results. It has been administered to about half a dozen patients, with most surviving. Although tests on animals have shown positive results, Zmapp has not been tested clinically on humans.
Nevertheless, Zmapp is the world’s best bet for an Ebola treatment, at least right now. The problem is, there are not enough doses to conduct clinical trials – or to treat patients, for that matter. Production is being handled by a company called Kentucky Bioprocessing (KBP), which has been using tobacco plants to synthesize Zmapp. Tobacco plants are injected with Ebola virus and fused with genes for a natural tobacco virus. The plant then responds, producing antibodies to fight the virus. The antibodies are extracted and injected in Ebola victims, hopefully curing them.
It was CollPlant that pioneered the mass production of human materials in tobacco plants. “We didn’t invent the method, but we have taken it farther than anyone else,” said Shoseyov. Using nanotechnology, CollPlant produces human collagen from tobacco plants, a far better way to produce an element essential to repairing bones and joints than the alternatives – using materials extracted from cows and pigs to produce artificial collagen.
Prof. Oded Shoseyov (Photo credit: Courtesy)

Collagen is a key component of the body, playing a major role in connective tissue and used by the body to repair broken bones and joints. When a splint is applied to a broken bone and the two separated parts of the bone are joined, the body will usually produce enough collagen to complete the repair process. However, if part of the bone is missing, the body will be unable to replace or repair it. In those cases, artificial collagen can be applied to the break, with a scaffold holding the elements in place, allowing the body to use the inserted collagen to make the repair.
Artificial collagen made from pigs and cows is common but not ideal. An alternative is harvesting of human collagen from corpses. Human collagen from the dead is more effective for the body, but collagen can be harvested only from donors, so supplies are limited.
CollPlant’s solution allows the production of real human collagen – producing material that can be most efficiently used by the human body – without the need to rely on the dead. CollPlant’s technology inserts human collagen into tobacco plants that are raised in hothouses, ensuring that they remain isolated from the food chain. The bio-engineered plants mimic the natural synthesis of authentic human protein and produces Procollagen, the natural precursor of collagen. The Procollagen collected from the plants and is processed into CollPlant’s artificial collagen product.
“Tobacco has a big biomass, and it grows quickly; you can grow a six-foot-tall plant in under two months,” said CollPlant CEO Yehiel Tal. “The production process is easy to control using our technology. We know how much collagen there is in the leaves produced by the plants, and can regulate its strength. And tobacco leaves are big, so they hold lots of collagen.”
CollPlant, which has been in business for about six years, is also the most experienced company in the world at producing large amounts of complex human materials in tobacco plants, said Shoseyov. “There are several companies, for example, developing ways to produce insulin in tobacco plants, but insulin is just a single protein. Collagen is much more complicated. To produce it you have to synthesize five human genes, a very difficult feat. I don’t know of any other company that can do this.”
As such, CollPlant is ready and able to help out the makers of Zmapp, or anyone else, who might seek assistance in the production process. Not that they need any help, said Shoseyov. “We know them very well, and they know what they are doing. We have been in touch with them on a regular basis; the community of researchers doing work in this area is very small.”
CollPlant’s experience in this area is likely to become an important resource in many areas of medical treatment. Production of collagen, antibodies, proteins, and other human material via plants – especially tobacco plants – is the wave of the future, said Shoseyov.
“The investment numbers make so much more sense, both in development – the ‘upstream’ – and testing and production – the ‘downstream,’” he said. “Currently, manufacturers have to set up clean rooms with all sorts of gear and equipment, at a cost of as much as $100 million, in order to develop new cures. In addition, these facilities require all sorts of government licenses and authorizations, so the process between the beginning of research and production could take as long as five years. Setting up a greenhouse for experimental medicine costs about a half million dollars, and requires a lot less government oversight,” he said.
“In addition, researchers working on a treatment don’t have to be as careful with procedures to prevent germs and viruses from spreading – because plants do not harbor human pathogens. The research process can be relaxed, with researchers putting more of their attention into solving problems. More researchers and companies are looking at these methods to develop treatments of all kinds, and that, I believe, will benefit everyone,” Shoseyov added.
If there was one piece of advice Shoseyov has for the Zmapp makers, it’s this: “Just do it. The methods of production are as simple as raising tomatoes and lettuce – and the world is waiting for this.”


 
http://proliberty.com/observer/20071206.htm
From the December 2007 Idaho Observer:

Aluminum-hydroxide in vaccines causes serious health problems
By Tenna Merchent
There are three basic aluminum salts used in vaccines: aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate and potassium-aluminum sulfate, or alum. The three forms are not interchangeable as they each have their own chemical properties.
A new disease has been identified, first in France, called macrophagic myofasciitis (MMF). The condition manifests with spread out muscle pain and chronic fatigue. One third of the patients develop an autoimmune disease, such as multiple sclerosis (MS) or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS or Lou Gehrig’s disease). Even if they don’t have an obvious autoimmune disease, most of them are part of a subgroup called HLADRB1*01 that puts them at risk of developing polymyalgia rheumatica and rheumatoid arthritis.[SUP]1[/SUP]
Doctors have identified that the aluminum-hydroxide in the vaccines stays at the site of the injection for years. The whole time it is there, it is stimulating an immune response. Which is exactly why the vaccine makers include it in the vaccine, so that the immune system will react more strongly to the virus or toxoid. But switching the immune system on without turning it off is not good for the body. This appears to be what causes the chronic fatigue seen in MMF.[SUP]2[/SUP]
In studies they were able to reproduce the MMF lesions in rats, and concluded that they were caused by the aluminum-hydroxide in the vaccines, and the ongoing local immune reaction.[SUP]3[/SUP] The vaccines in question for this particular study were hepatitis B, hepatitis A and tetanus.
The reason MMF was first discovered in France is because when they do a muscle biopsy, they do it on the deltoid muscle of the arm, where the vaccines are injected. In the United States, biopsies are done on the calf.
In another study of 92 MMF patients, eight had a demyelinating central nervous system disorder. The myelin sheath is the protective covering that surrounds and insulates nerves. When myelin is damaged, the nerves eventually become damaged, leading to disrupted transmission of signals within the nervous system.[SUP]4[/SUP] The MS diagnosis was definite in five out of seven cases, and probable in two out of seven.[SUP]5[/SUP] Based on the association with MMF and MS disorders they suggested that deltoid muscle biopsies be done in cases of MS to look for MMF.
MMF has now been identified in children, and was characterized by motor delay, hypotonia (diminished muscle tone), and failure to thrive. They concluded that MMF should be considered in the evaluation of children with failure to thrive, diminished muscle tone, and muscle weakness.[SUP]6[/SUP]
Many believe the anthrax vaccine is the cause of Gulf War illness (GWI). ALS and other neurological disorders are associated with some cases of GWI. There was a study done that looked at the effect aluminum-hydroxide and squalene had on GWI, both being adjuvants in the anthrax vaccine. Adjuvants are agents that increase a specific immune response to an antigen.
They injected young male mice with either aluminum hydroxide or squalene, or a combination of aluminum-hydroxide and squalene. They performed motor and cognitive-behavioral tests on the mice when they were alive, and after sacrifice they examined central nervous system tissues for evidence of inflammation and cell death.
The mice that received the aluminum showed motor deficits that were seen by decreased strength. The also found apoptotic neurons, which means suicidal neurons, or neurons that are destroying themselves (225%), and neuron loss (35%) in the lumbar spinal cord.[SUP]7[/SUP]
Aluminum hydroxide is an adjuvant used in the following vaccines: DTaP, BioThrax, DPT, Engerix-B, Gardasil, Havrix, LYMErix, Prevnar, Rabies Vaccine Adsorbed, Recombivax, and Tripedia.
So what can we conclude from all of this? Science has proven that the following conditions may all be caused by the aluminum-hydroxide in vaccines: Chronic fatigue, Multiple sclerosis , Lou Gehrig’s disease, Demyelinating central nervous system disorders, Plymyalgia rheumatica and rheumatoid arthritis, Motor delay, Hypotonia or diminished muscle tone, Failure to thrive, Apoptic neurons, which are self-destructing neurons in the lumbar spinal cord, Neuron loss in the lumbar spinal cord.
I’ve known for over four years now that aluminum was bad for the body, but as usual, I just didn’t know how bad it is. However, there is plenty of scientific evidence, hidden in plain sight, proving the pervasiveness and toxic nature of aluminum in our world today. ~
Tenna Merchent, M.H., is the author of He’s Not Autistic But… How We Pulled Our Son From the Mouth of the Abyss. She is a student of Trinity College of Natural Health and has nearly completed her degree in Naturopathy. Her book is available from Vaccination Liberation for $20 (includes S&H.) Merchant’s footnotes for this article are available in the online version of this article at www.idaho-observer.com.

Notes [SUP]1 Gherardi RK, "Lesson from macrophagic myofasciitis: towards definition of a vaccine adjuvant-related syndrome," Rev Neurol (Paris). 2003 Feb; 159 (2): 162-4.
[SUP]2 Ibid.
[SUP]3 Authier FJ et al, "Central nervous system disease in patients with macrophagic myofasciitis," Brain. 2001 Sep;124 (Pt 9): 1821-31.
[SUP]4 Melissa Stoppler, M.D., Barbra K. Hecht, Ph.D., "New Multiple Sclerosis Treatment Suspended," MedicineNet.com, http://www.medicinenet.com/script/main/art.asp?articlekey=46484,
[SUP]5 Gherardi RK et al, "Macrophagic myofasciitis lesions assess long-term persistence of vaccine-derived aluminum hydroxide in muscle," Brain. 2001 Sep;124 (Pt 9): 1821-31.
[SUP]6 Gruis KL, Teener JW, Blaivas M., "Pediatric macrophagic myofasciitis associated with motor delay," Clin Neuropathol. 2006 Jul-Aug; 25(4):172-9.
[SUP]7 Michael S., Petrik, "Aluminum Adjuvant Linked to Gulf War Illness Induces Motor Neuron Death in Mice," NeuroMolecular Medicine, February 2007, Volume 9, Issue 1, pps 83-100.

[/SUP][/SUP][/SUP][/SUP][/SUP][/SUP][/SUP]
 
Understanding why mercury was first incorporated into childhood vaccines leads back to the preantibiotic era, a time when physicians employed a variety of compounds known as “germicides” to combat bacteria. Perhaps the best known was Joseph Lister’s carbolic acid, developed in the 1860s for surgical antisepsis and later employed as a germicide and preservative known as phenol.5 Yet a variety of mercury compounds were also used for the same purpose. No less an authority than Robert Koch championed the use of mercury chloride as an antiseptic, although the product’s propensity to cause tissue irritation limited its use. In the early 20th century, investigators synthesized a new class of compounds they claimed to be both more effective and less toxic, the organomercurials. Often brilliantly colored, these products soon found widespread usage, from operating suites to home medicine cabinets.6

Thimerosal was one of the most promising new organomercurials that excited the pharmaceutical industry after World War I. It was a white, crystalline powder, approximately 50% mercury by weight, in the form of ethylmercury bound to thiosalicylate. The emerging pharmaceutical giant Eli Lilly and Company provided grant support for its synthesis at the University of Chicago and in 1928 patented it under the trade name Merthiolate.7 Over the next several years, Lilly’s investigators H.M. Powell and W.A. Jamieson conducted extensive in vitro testing, showing that thimerosal was 40 to 50 times as effective as phenol against Staphylococcus aureus. The two men evaluated toxicity by injecting the compound into over 300 rabbits and a variety of other animals observed for a week’s time. The animals appeared to tolerate significant doses—up to 20 mg per kg body weight in rabbits and still higher in rats—without apparent injury.8

These encouraging results prompted the Lilly team in 1929 to offer their product to the Indiana General Hospital during an epidemic of meningococcal meningitis. Hospital physicians gave 22 patients as much as 180 mL of a 1% solution of thimerosal intravenously divided over five doses. From a therapeutic standpoint, the trial was a failure, but investigators were struck by how well the patients seemed to tolerate such high doses.9 Combined with the animal studies, the data further reinforced the impression that thimerosal was far more benign than earlier mercurials, preparing the way for its incorporation at low concentrations into a wide range of biological products as a preservative. Vaccines would become an especially important niche.

One of the most troublesome safety issues afflicting early 20th-century child immunization was that of bacterial contamination. This could easily occur on a sporadic basis, when general practitioners might have to draw vaccines from multidose vials under poor hygienic conditions. Contamination of entire lots could be much more spectacular. In Columbia, South Carolina, in 1916, a tainted batch of typhoid vaccine stored at room temperature caused 68 severe reactions, 26 abscesses, and 4 deaths. A still more disturbing incident took place in 1928 in Queensland, Australia, where 12 of 21 children inoculated with contaminated diphtheria vaccine died of multiple staphylococcal abscesses and toxemia. The need for effective preservatives was readily apparent and represented one of the most important safety issues for the promoters of new vaccines.10

In this context, Powell and Jamieson’s studies suggested that Merthiolate had an unexpected advantage. The problem with existing preservatives such as phenol and cresol was that they often reduced the potency of the biological products they were intended to protect. By contrast, thimerosal not only inhibited bacterial growth in vaccines and antisera at concentrations as low as 1:10000 but also had no such deleterious effects.11 A series of other investigators confirmed these findings over the next several years, and by 1940 thimerosal was incorporated into diphtheria toxoid, meningococcal serum, pertussis vaccine, and a host of other biological products.12 Indeed, in 1938 Lilly’s assistant director of research listed Merthiolate along with insulin as one of the five most important drugs ever developed by the company.13
.
 
The vaccines aren't safe for anyone regardless of their race

If you trust big pharma companies like BAYER who knowingly sold products they knew were infected with HIV then frankly you are incredibly naive

If you trust your government who is bought and paid for by the big corporations then you are beyond naive

http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/201...-us-citizens-will-this-year-be-any-different/

[h=1]Last Year’s Flu Vaccine Killed and Injured Over 93,000 US Citizens – Will This Year be Any Different?[/h] Posted by: TLB Staff

By TLB Staff Writer: Christina England
Whilst governments around the world maximize their flu vaccine targets for this year, pushing the vaccine onto younger and younger children, last year two sets of parents were left wishing they had ignored their advice.
[h=3]Story # 1 – Nine Year Old Marysue Left Visually Impaired and Paralyzed[/h] Marysue was a happy, healthy little girl, who loved nothing more than to run and play and sing in the church choir. Four days after receiving last year’s routine flu vaccine however, she was left visually impaired, totally paralyzed and needing 24 hour a day nursing care from her family.
Nine year old Marysue, from Tampa, Florida, received her flu vaccination on November 21st 2013 and within days was left fighting for her life in hospital.
[h=3]10 News stated:[/h] “Four days after getting the vaccine, Marysue fell ill with a rare viral infection of the brain called Acute Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (ADEM).”
Director of Infectious Diseases Dr. Juan Dumois, from the All Children’s Hospital told reporters that:
“Developing the illness, for which there is no way to predict or prevent, from a flu shot happens.” (own emphasis)
After his somewhat flippant remark, he then tried to backtrack by saying that he still recommended that children receive the flu vaccine because ADEM can also be contracted by catching the flu and stated:
“If I get the flu I’m far more likely to get ADEM than from the flu vaccine.” [1]
However, despite Dr. Dumois’s reassurances, Marysue’s parents remain unconvinced, saying that they believe the vaccine was responsible for their daughter’s serious health problems.
[h=3]Marysue’s Parents Tell Their Version of the Story on Fund Raising Website[/h] Telling her story on a gofundme campaign, set up to raise enough money for a new bedroom for her daughter that is large enough to accommodate a hospital bed, Marysue’s mother tells of the day her daughter received the flu shot and the events that followed.
[h=3]She wrote:[/h] “On November 20, 2013, received her annual flu shot. Then, on the evening of November 25, 2013, she played freeze tag with her friends, ate her dinner and went to bed. Marysue was fine when her father and I turned in around ten that night. The next morning, she did not get up at six as she normally did. I went in to check on her. When I called her, she did not respond. I attempted to wake her and could not at first. Finally, she opened her eyes but she did not speak to me which was not normal for her.
I immediately called Stephen (her father). We called 911; they sent an ambulance. After they evaluated her, they told me to get in the ambulance. I had to ride in the front. I later found out that on the way to the hospital she had a seizure. Later, we were told that during the night she had a previous seizure with lack of oxygen.” [2]
Note: (Disseminated Encephalomyelitis (ADEM) is characterized by a brief but widespread attack of inflammation in the brain and spinal cord that damages myelin – the protective covering of nerve fibers. Although it can be caused by a viral or bacterial infection, vaccinations are also a known cause.) [3]
Their ongoing campaign has managed to raise nearly $12,000 from people touched by her tragic story but in reality their kind donations are just a drop in the ocean compared with the figure Marysue’s parents need, to redesign their house and buy their daughter a van large enough to accommodate her wheelchair.
[h=3]Story # 2 – Healthy Nineteen Year Old Killed By the Flu Shot[/h] Marysue, was not the only child to suffer devastating adverse reactions from the Flu vaccine last year. A healthy, active nineteen year old male from Utah, was also reported to have had a severe adverse reaction from the vaccine.
Chandler Webb had his whole life ahead of him the day that he was vaccinated with his first ever flu vaccination. Lori Webb, Chandler’s mother, told Fox News that the day after he received the vaccine, he became severely ill, suffering from severe headaches, shaking and vomiting. Fearing the worse, she immediately took her son to Salt Lake Hospital where he fell into a coma.
Sadly, Chandler never recovered from the coma and 28 days later a decision was made to turn off his life support.
His mother says that she has been left in no doubt that the flu vaccine was responsible for Chandler’s death and made the following statement to Fox News:
“He was so healthy. He was pure. He should have been able to fight the flu. I wish he would have gotten the flu rather than this vaccination.” [4]
Once again health officials told the public that it was unlikely the flu vaccine was responsible for Chandler’s death and emphasized that the flu vaccine was safe.
However, despite health officials everywhere burying their heads in the sand and ignoring the facts, Chandler was just one of 1,080 flu vaccine deaths reported last year.
[h=3]At Least 93,000 Adverse Reactions Reported Last Year[/h] According to the National Vaccine Information Center (NIVC), the US Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) received a massive 93,000 reports of adverse reactions following last year’s flu vaccine. These included 1,080 deaths and 8,888 hospitalizations.
[h=3]NIVC stated:[/h] “As of November 2013, there have been more than 93,000 reports of reactions, hospitalizations, injuries and deaths following influenza vaccinations made to the federal Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS), including 1,080 related deaths, 8,888 hospitalizations, 1,801 related disabilities and over 1,700 cases of GBS. In 2013 the Federal Advisory Commission on Childhood Vaccines (ACCV) voted to add GBS to the Vaccine Injury Table within the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP). [5]
It is only when you take into consideration that these figures only represent the adverse reactions reported in the US, can you even begin to appreciate the true extent of the problem.
[h=3]Conclusion[/h] At this time of year there are advertisements on the flu vaccine just about everywhere you go and yet despite many doctors and health officials insisting that the flu vaccines are safe and effective, reports from around the World tell a different story.
Before parents decide to have their child vaccinated with years flu vaccination, they should ask themselves whether or not this particular vaccine is worth the risk.
[h=3]References[/h] 1. http://www.wtsp.com/story/news/local/2014/10/30/mom-daughter-paralyzed-because-of-flu-shot/18218703/
2. http://www.gofundme.com/g5lbzg
3.http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/acute_encephalomyelitis/acute_encephalomyelitis.htm
4. http://www.foxnews.com/health/2013/11/25/mother-claims-flu-shot-killed-her-teenage-son/
5. http://www.nvic.org/vaccines-and-diseases/Influenza.aspx
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~​
About the author:​
Christina was born and educated in London, U.K. In 1978, Christina changed her career path to dedicate her time to caring for the elderly and was awarded the title of Care Giver of the Year for her work with the elderly in 1980. For the last decade, Christina England has been investigating the safety and efficacy of vaccines. Her articles have had over 500,000 hits and she is now known worldwide for her groundbreaking journalism work.
Christina also has created a world first online resource for parents who have lost their children after vaccine injuries
parentsandcarersagainstinjustice.weebly.com/

Wow, this is an excellent example of propaganda. Story #1. ADEM is when the immune system attacks mylenated axons in the brain. Scientists don't even know what causes it really. It's a malfunction of the immune system, my guess is its caused by a genetic error in the immune code. Just because one thing happened just before another thing does not mean the first thing caused the second thing. That's a relation not a causation. In fact its one of the most common errors in logic that the general public makes. Specifically because that is the way our brain is hardwired. ADEM is weird. Its a failure of the immune systems "target recognition" as it may be. Do you have some explanation as to how a dead flu virus could somehow trick or cause the immune system to malfunction? it doesn't make sense.
Story #2 doesn't even say the cause of the coma, only that it happened after he got a vaccine. Again, that says nothing about that cause. He ate food before he slipped into a coma, maybe he was poisoned. Its illogical to assume the vaccine was the cause. That statistic about the 1000 or so supposed flu vaccine deaths is misleading. Those cases they reference go through a specific court system that need only say it is possible, not that it is the cause. That is in place to protect against the possibility that it is true. In fact in those courts, it would be acceptable to say that because the vaccine could cause ADEM on the grounds that we don't know what causes ADEM, and because it occurred so soon after the vaccine was given, then compensation is given. And then is added to the statistic. That does not mean that it is caused by the vaccine. Remember a temporal relation does not mean a causal relation. It can, but not necessarily.

Now you are pointing out specific cases where the vaccine has caused an adverse reaction. Let's pretend for a moment that you are correct. Now, I will point out the reverse. Adverse reactions without having had a vaccine. In America in 2011, 15,216 reported cases of pertussis, 1139 hepatitis A, 2495 hepatitis B, 3184 haemophilus (influenza B), and 12,041 varicella. All very much preventable from vaccines. No deaths thanks to secondary treatment. World wide reported cases, pertussis 30-50 million cases and 300,000 deaths, hepatitis A 1.4 million cases, hepatitis b 2 BILLION cases and 600,000 deaths, haemophilus (influenza B) 8 million cases, 200,000 deaths, varicella 80-90 million cases, and no report for the number of deaths. And all this is just direct cases.
Some of the diseases have a secondary infection such as pneumonia that is the actual cause of death.

Since you want to point out cases of death or suffering from vaccines, how about I point out cases of death and suffering from the diseases that CAN and ARE prevented.

http://www.immunize.org/reports/pertussis.asp
9 cases of infant to 4 year old children dying of pertussis in a painful manor.

http://www.immunize.org/reports/meningococcus.asp
5 cases of college aged people dying from meningitis

http://www.immunize.org/reports/diphtheria.asp
an infant and an older man die from diphtheria

http://www.immunize.org/reports/chickenpox.asp
24 cases of all ages dying of chicken pox

http://www.immunize.org/reports/polio.asp
4 cases of death from polio. A 3, a 6, an 8, and a 22 year old.

Need I go on? Now, if you try suggesting that its better to have the disease, why don't you read about what some of these diseases do to you?

pertussis initially has runny nose, slight fever, and diarrhea, that can lead to hypoxia (not enough oxygen, makes the skin blue), stopped breathing, seizures or convlusions, vomiting, dehydration, and this can be accompanied by pneumonia, nose bleeds, ear infections, brain damage from lack of oxygen, bleeding in the brain, eventually resulting in death. All of this in an infant.

meningitis causes headache, stiff muscles, high fever, photophobia and phonophobia, and can lead to sepsis, falling blood pressure, increased inflammation throughout the body, the blood can start to clot in your bloodstream, swelling brain tissue, seizures, brain damage, hemorrhaging of the agrenal glands, and if that don't kill you it can be accompanied by gangrene, encephalitis, and a number of deficiencies from sensory systems to cognitive systems to the immune system.

diphtheria creates a toxin that kills many parts of the body and starts with difficulty breathing, swollen lymph nodes, chills, fever, loud coughing, blue skin again from lack of oxygen, and can lead to breathing problems caused by damage to the throat, heart damage from inflammation of the heart muscle that can lead to heart failure, nerve damage that can cause paralysis for the lungs or other muscles

usually chicken pox is ok, and we are all familiar with the symptoms of blisters that itch anywhere on the skin or inside some places, scarring, and can have headaches, abdominal pain, or fever. The problem is if a complication develops such as pneumonia, dehydration, encephalitis, or hepatitis.

polio can have fever, sore throat, headache, vomitin, fatigue, muscle stiffness weakness and tenderness, and can be accompanied by meningitis, loss of muscle control, breathing problems, cognitive failure, many of which can lead to death.


So assuming that your right muir, and vaccines are dangerous because of your stories as examples, there are far more stories of death and pain and suffering for those that didn't get vaccinated.

If you need further examples, look here:
http://www.immunize.org/reports/general.asp
 
Wow, this is an excellent example of propaganda. Story #1. ADEM is when the immune system attacks mylenated axons in the brain. Scientists don't even know what causes it really. It's a malfunction of the immune system, my guess is its caused by a genetic error in the immune code. Just because one thing happened just before another thing does not mean the first thing caused the second thing. That's a relation not a causation. In fact its one of the most common errors in logic that the general public makes. Specifically because that is the way our brain is hardwired. ADEM is weird. Its a failure of the immune systems "target recognition" as it may be. Do you have some explanation as to how a dead flu virus could somehow trick or cause the immune system to malfunction? it doesn't make sense.
Story #2 doesn't even say the cause of the coma, only that it happened after he got a vaccine. Again, that says nothing about that cause. He ate food before he slipped into a coma, maybe he was poisoned. Its illogical to assume the vaccine was the cause. That statistic about the 1000 or so supposed flu vaccine deaths is misleading. Those cases they reference go through a specific court system that need only say it is possible, not that it is the cause. That is in place to protect against the possibility that it is true. In fact in those courts, it would be acceptable to say that because the vaccine could cause ADEM on the grounds that we don't know what causes ADEM, and because it occurred so soon after the vaccine was given, then compensation is given. And then is added to the statistic. That does not mean that it is caused by the vaccine. Remember a temporal relation does not mean a causal relation. It can, but not necessarily.

Now you are pointing out specific cases where the vaccine has caused an adverse reaction. Let's pretend for a moment that you are correct. Now, I will point out the reverse. Adverse reactions without having had a vaccine. In America in 2011, 15,216 reported cases of pertussis, 1139 hepatitis A, 2495 hepatitis B, 3184 haemophilus (influenza B), and 12,041 varicella. All very much preventable from vaccines. No deaths thanks to secondary treatment. World wide reported cases, pertussis 30-50 million cases and 300,000 deaths, hepatitis A 1.4 million cases, hepatitis b 2 BILLION cases and 600,000 deaths, haemophilus (influenza B) 8 million cases, 200,000 deaths, varicella 80-90 million cases, and no report for the number of deaths. And all this is just direct cases.
Some of the diseases have a secondary infection such as pneumonia that is the actual cause of death.

Since you want to point out cases of death or suffering from vaccines, how about I point out cases of death and suffering from the diseases that CAN and ARE prevented.

http://www.immunize.org/reports/pertussis.asp
9 cases of infant to 4 year old children dying of pertussis in a painful manor.

http://www.immunize.org/reports/meningococcus.asp
5 cases of college aged people dying from meningitis

http://www.immunize.org/reports/diphtheria.asp
an infant and an older man die from diphtheria

http://www.immunize.org/reports/chickenpox.asp
24 cases of all ages dying of chicken pox

http://www.immunize.org/reports/polio.asp
4 cases of death from polio. A 3, a 6, an 8, and a 22 year old.

Need I go on? Now, if you try suggesting that its better to have the disease, why don't you read about what some of these diseases do to you?

pertussis initially has runny nose, slight fever, and diarrhea, that can lead to hypoxia (not enough oxygen, makes the skin blue), stopped breathing, seizures or convlusions, vomiting, dehydration, and this can be accompanied by pneumonia, nose bleeds, ear infections, brain damage from lack of oxygen, bleeding in the brain, eventually resulting in death. All of this in an infant.

meningitis causes headache, stiff muscles, high fever, photophobia and phonophobia, and can lead to sepsis, falling blood pressure, increased inflammation throughout the body, the blood can start to clot in your bloodstream, swelling brain tissue, seizures, brain damage, hemorrhaging of the agrenal glands, and if that don't kill you it can be accompanied by gangrene, encephalitis, and a number of deficiencies from sensory systems to cognitive systems to the immune system.

diphtheria creates a toxin that kills many parts of the body and starts with difficulty breathing, swollen lymph nodes, chills, fever, loud coughing, blue skin again from lack of oxygen, and can lead to breathing problems caused by damage to the throat, heart damage from inflammation of the heart muscle that can lead to heart failure, nerve damage that can cause paralysis for the lungs or other muscles

usually chicken pox is ok, and we are all familiar with the symptoms of blisters that itch anywhere on the skin or inside some places, scarring, and can have headaches, abdominal pain, or fever. The problem is if a complication develops such as pneumonia, dehydration, encephalitis, or hepatitis.

polio can have fever, sore throat, headache, vomitin, fatigue, muscle stiffness weakness and tenderness, and can be accompanied by meningitis, loss of muscle control, breathing problems, cognitive failure, many of which can lead to death.


So assuming that your right muir, and vaccines are dangerous because of your stories as examples, there are far more stories of death and pain and suffering for those that didn't get vaccinated.

If you need further examples, look here:
http://www.immunize.org/reports/general.asp

Sorry your 'guess' ain't going to cut it

What are your credentials?

Also i want your response to the two articles i posted above about the finding of sterilisation chemicals in UN vaccines given to women in Africa
 
Wow, this is an excellent example of propaganda. Story #1. ADEM is when the immune system attacks mylenated axons in the brain. Scientists don't even know what causes it really. It's a malfunction of the immune system, my guess is its caused by a genetic error in the immune code. Just because one thing happened just before another thing does not mean the first thing caused the second thing. That's a relation not a causation. In fact its one of the most common errors in logic that the general public makes. Specifically because that is the way our brain is hardwired. ADEM is weird. Its a failure of the immune systems "target recognition" as it may be. Do you have some explanation as to how a dead flu virus could somehow trick or cause the immune system to malfunction? it doesn't make sense.
Story #2 doesn't even say the cause of the coma, only that it happened after he got a vaccine. Again, that says nothing about that cause. He ate food before he slipped into a coma, maybe he was poisoned. Its illogical to assume the vaccine was the cause. That statistic about the 1000 or so supposed flu vaccine deaths is misleading. Those cases they reference go through a specific court system that need only say it is possible, not that it is the cause. That is in place to protect against the possibility that it is true. In fact in those courts, it would be acceptable to say that because the vaccine could cause ADEM on the grounds that we don't know what causes ADEM, and because it occurred so soon after the vaccine was given, then compensation is given. And then is added to the statistic. That does not mean that it is caused by the vaccine. Remember a temporal relation does not mean a causal relation. It can, but not necessarily.

Now you are pointing out specific cases where the vaccine has caused an adverse reaction. Let's pretend for a moment that you are correct. Now, I will point out the reverse. Adverse reactions without having had a vaccine. In America in 2011, 15,216 reported cases of pertussis, 1139 hepatitis A, 2495 hepatitis B, 3184 haemophilus (influenza B), and 12,041 varicella. All very much preventable from vaccines. No deaths thanks to secondary treatment. World wide reported cases, pertussis 30-50 million cases and 300,000 deaths, hepatitis A 1.4 million cases, hepatitis b 2 BILLION cases and 600,000 deaths, haemophilus (influenza B) 8 million cases, 200,000 deaths, varicella 80-90 million cases, and no report for the number of deaths. And all this is just direct cases.
Some of the diseases have a secondary infection such as pneumonia that is the actual cause of death.

Since you want to point out cases of death or suffering from vaccines, how about I point out cases of death and suffering from the diseases that CAN and ARE prevented.

http://www.immunize.org/reports/pertussis.asp
9 cases of infant to 4 year old children dying of pertussis in a painful manor.

http://www.immunize.org/reports/meningococcus.asp
5 cases of college aged people dying from meningitis

http://www.immunize.org/reports/diphtheria.asp
an infant and an older man die from diphtheria

http://www.immunize.org/reports/chickenpox.asp
24 cases of all ages dying of chicken pox

http://www.immunize.org/reports/polio.asp
4 cases of death from polio. A 3, a 6, an 8, and a 22 year old.

Need I go on? Now, if you try suggesting that its better to have the disease, why don't you read about what some of these diseases do to you?

pertussis initially has runny nose, slight fever, and diarrhea, that can lead to hypoxia (not enough oxygen, makes the skin blue), stopped breathing, seizures or convlusions, vomiting, dehydration, and this can be accompanied by pneumonia, nose bleeds, ear infections, brain damage from lack of oxygen, bleeding in the brain, eventually resulting in death. All of this in an infant.

meningitis causes headache, stiff muscles, high fever, photophobia and phonophobia, and can lead to sepsis, falling blood pressure, increased inflammation throughout the body, the blood can start to clot in your bloodstream, swelling brain tissue, seizures, brain damage, hemorrhaging of the agrenal glands, and if that don't kill you it can be accompanied by gangrene, encephalitis, and a number of deficiencies from sensory systems to cognitive systems to the immune system.

diphtheria creates a toxin that kills many parts of the body and starts with difficulty breathing, swollen lymph nodes, chills, fever, loud coughing, blue skin again from lack of oxygen, and can lead to breathing problems caused by damage to the throat, heart damage from inflammation of the heart muscle that can lead to heart failure, nerve damage that can cause paralysis for the lungs or other muscles

usually chicken pox is ok, and we are all familiar with the symptoms of blisters that itch anywhere on the skin or inside some places, scarring, and can have headaches, abdominal pain, or fever. The problem is if a complication develops such as pneumonia, dehydration, encephalitis, or hepatitis.

polio can have fever, sore throat, headache, vomitin, fatigue, muscle stiffness weakness and tenderness, and can be accompanied by meningitis, loss of muscle control, breathing problems, cognitive failure, many of which can lead to death.


So assuming that your right muir, and vaccines are dangerous because of your stories as examples, there are far more stories of death and pain and suffering for those that didn't get vaccinated.

If you need further examples, look here:
http://www.immunize.org/reports/general.asp
.
 
Sorry your 'guess' ain't going to cut it

What are your credentials?

Also i want your response to the two articles i posted above about the finding of sterilisation chemicals in UN vaccines given to women in Africa
These aren't guesses. Every single symptom and secondary infection I listed can be found in various medical journals and encyclopedias. All over the internet. The only part you have to complain about is the part where you said my guess, and I wouldn't expect that to be worth much. That's why I went on to explain otherwise. Why don't you try learning about the things your talking about, you know the science behind it like biology and chemistry before claiming this stuff. And I will get to the other things you posted if and when I have time. I kinda have a life beyond debating with you.
 
If you continue to fill up this thread with reposts of posts already posted i will speak to the thread starter and see if they want them removed
 
These aren't guesses. Every single symptom and secondary infection I listed can be found in various medical journals and encyclopedias. All over the internet. The only part you have to complain about is the part where you said my guess, and I wouldn't expect that to be worth much. That's why I went on to explain otherwise. Why don't you try learning about the things your talking about, you know the science behind it like biology and chemistry before claiming this stuff. And I will get to the other things you posted if and when I have time. I kinda have a life beyond debating with you.

You have no credentials, you haven't disproved anything

You don;t know anymore than i do, all you are doing is trying to bury the articles i'm posting with bullshit

You can take your guess and keep it because i'm only interested in informed posts and you are not informed

You have no credentials, just opinion

I on the other hand am posting information from people who do have credentials

For you this seems to be a game but for me i am trying to prevent peopel reading this from poisoning themselves or their children
 
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/a...kenyan-doctors-find-anti-fertility-agent-in-u

[h=1]‘A mass sterilization exercise’: Kenyan doctors find anti-fertility agent in UN tetanus vaccine[/h] catholic , kenya , population control , united nations , world health organization
UPDATE (Nov. 12): Kenya's government has launched an investigation into the Catholic Church's allegations. See follow up article here.
Kenya’s Catholic bishops are charging two United Nations organizations with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus inoculation program sponsored by the Kenyan government.
According to a statement released Tuesday by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, the organization has found an antigen that causes miscarriages in a vaccine being administered to 2.3 million girls and women by the World Health Organization and UNICEF. Priests throughout Kenya reportedly are advising their congregations to refuse the vaccine.
“We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen,” Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi told LifeSiteNews. “They were all laced with HCG.”
Dr. Ngare, spokesman for the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, stated in a bulletin released November 4, “This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored.”
But the government says the vaccine is safe. Health Minister James Macharia even told the BBC, “I would recommend my own daughter and wife to take it because I entirely 100% agree with it and have confidence it has no adverse health effects.”
And Dr. Collins Tabu, head of the Health Ministry’s immunization branch, told the Kenyan Nation, that “there is no other additive in the vaccine other than the tetanus antigen.”
Tabu said the same vaccine has been used for 30 years in Kenya. Moreover, “there are women who were vaccinated in October 2013 and March this year who are expectant. Therefore we deny that the vaccines are laced with contraceptives.”
Newspaper stories also report women getting pregnant after being vaccinated.
Responds Dr. Ngare: “Either we are lying or the government is lying. But ask yourself, ‘What reason do the Catholic doctors have for lying?’” Dr. Ngare added: “The Catholic Church has been here in Kenya providing health care and vaccinating for 100 years for longer than Kenya has existed as a country.”
Dr. Ngare told LifeSiteNews that several things alerted doctors in the Church’s far-flung medical system of 54 hospitals, 83 health centres, and 17 medical and nursing schools to the possibility the anti-tetanus campaign was secretly an anti-fertility campaign.
Why, they ask does it involve an unprecedented five shots (or “jabs” as they are known, in Kenya) over more than two years and why is it applied only to women of child-bearing years, and why is it not being conducted without the usual fanfare of government publicity?
“Usually we give a series three shots over two to three years, we give it anyone who comes into the clinic with an open wound, men, women or children.” said Dr. Ngare. “If this is intended to inoculate children in the womb, why give it to girls starting at 15 years? You cannot get married till you are 18.” The usual way to vaccinate children is to wait till they are six weeks old.”
But it is the five-vaccination regime that is most alarming. “The only time tetanus vaccine has been given in five doses is when it is used as a carrier in fertility regulating vaccines laced with the pregnancy hormone, Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) developed by WHO in 1992.”
It is HCG that has been found in all six samples sent to the University of Nairobi medical laboratory and another in South Africa. The bishops and doctors warn that injecting women with HCG , which mimics a natural hormone produced by pregnant women, causes them to develop antibodies against it. When they do get pregnant, and produce their own version of HCG, it triggers the production of antibodies that cause a miscarriage.
“We knew that the last time this vaccination with five injections has been used was in Mexico in 1993 and Nicaragua and the Philippines in 1994,” said Dr. Ngare. “It didn’t cause miscarriages till three years later,” which is why, he added, the counterclaims that women who got the vaccination recently and then got pregnant are meaningless.
Ngare said WHO tried to bring the same anti-fertility program into Kenya in the 1990s. “We alerted the government and it stopped the vaccination. But this time they haven’t done so.”
Ngare also contrasted the secrecy of this campaign with the usual fanfare accompanying national vaccination efforts. “They usually bring all the stakeholders together three months before the campaign, like they did with polio a little while ago. And they use staff in all the centres to give out the vaccine.” But with this anti-tetanus campaign, “only a few operatives from the government are allowed to give it out. They come with a police escort. They take it away with them when they are finished. Why not leave it with the local medical staff to administer?”
Brian Clowes of Human Life International in Virginia told LifeSite News that WHO was not involved in the Nicaragua, Mexican and Philippines campaigns. “They try to maintain a spotless record. They let organizations like United Nations Population Fund and USAID do the dirty work.”
In the previous cases, said Clowes, the vaccinators insisted their product was pure until it was shown not to be. Then they claimed the positive tests for HCG were isolated, accidental contaminations in the manufacturing process.
LifeSiteNews has obtained a UN report on an August 1992 meeting at its world headquarters in Geneva of 10 scientists from “Australia, Europe, India and the U.S.A” and 10 “women’s health advocates” from around the world, to discuss the use of “fertility regulating vaccines.” It describes the “anti-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin vaccine” as the most advanced.
One million Kenyan women and girls have been vaccinated so far with another 1.3 million to go. The vaccination is targeting women, according to the government, in order to inoculate their children in the womb against tetanus as well. The government says 550 children die of tetanus yearly.
In covering the contest of words the pro-government Nation found plenty of women who had been vaccinated and were now pregnant, even one who was the wife of a former Catholic priest who left the Church to marry. The paper ignored Kenya’s reliance on the Catholic medical system, while setting the bishops’ stand in a questionable historical context of irrational responses “largely based on religious beliefs,” the more recent murder of vaccination teams in Nigeria, and even of CIA conspiracy theories.
Why would the UN want to suppress the population in developing countries? “Racism,” is Brian Clowes’ first explanation. “Also, the developed countries want to get hold of their natural resources. And lately, there is the whole bogus global warming thing.”
Dr. Ngare said it was the Catholic Church’s hope that the government could have resolved the matter quietly by testing the vaccine. “But the government has chosen to be combative,” forcing Kenya’s bishops and Catholic doctors to go public.
WHO’s Kenyan office and several WHO media contacts in Washington, D.C. failed to respond to LifeSiteNews enquiries over a 24-hour period.
 
http://www.thenewamerican.com/world...-un-vaccines-in-kenya-used-to-sterilize-women

Monday, 10 November 2014 [h=2]Doctors: UN Vaccines in Kenya Used to Sterilize Women[/h] Written by Alex Newman

Here's the other side of the story:

“The Catholic Bishops of Kenya are wrong,” he continued. “Their assertions about the tetanus vaccine and hCG are not backed up by evidence. The report from the laboratories that analyzed samples provided by the church shows that the results are invalid. The equipment that was used in the analysis should only be used to analyze human samples such as blood and urine and not vaccines. The samples were not properly identified as required — the laboratories were not informed if these were vaccines, blood or urine samples.”

I don't know who is right and who is wrong. However, if these comments about the procedure of the catholic lab are true, then they absolutely screwed up. On the other hand, if the catholic group did not screw up their studies then that raises other questions. That would not prove that the tCG is bad, only that it is there. Then you need to question why it is there. To do that you should look for possible causes of which a sterilization program is one possible cause. However we have not even objectively confirmed that there is tCG. This is why you should not make such an opinion until a second independent study (and sometimes preferably a third) is done. The information is literally insufficient. To much chance of error on either side.
 
http://www.thenewamerican.com/world...-un-unveils-plot-to-reduce-african-population

Thursday, 02 January 2014 [h=2]UN Unveils Plot to Reduce African Population[/h] Written by Alex Newman







The United Nations and its oftentimes barbaric population-control apparatus are under fire again after releasing a deeply controversial report claiming that the African population of Kenya is too large and growing too quickly. To deal with the supposed “challenge,” as the UN and its “partners” in the national government put it, international bureaucrats are demanding stepped up efforts to brainwash Kenyan women into wanting fewer children. Also on the agenda: more taxpayer-funded “family-planning” and “reproductive-health” schemes to reduce the number of Africans to levels considered “desirable” by the UN.
Critics promptly lambasted the plot as undisguised eugenics, with some experts calling it a true example of the “war on women.” Among other concerns, analysts outraged by the report noted that the UN Population Fund (UNFPA) and the establishment’s fiendish efforts to slash human populations — especially those considered “undesirable” by self-appointed guardians of the gene pool — have a long and sordid history going back decades. Today, the agenda marches on, as illustrated in the latest UN report calling for drastically reduced numbers of Kenyans.
Especially troubling is the eugenics component of the agenda, critics say. “This kind of eugenics by the United Nations and their population-control conspirators is not helping the black family but turning large poor families into small poor families,” explained Mark Crutcher, president of the U.S.-based pro-life group Life Dynamics. Crutcher is also the producer of the hard-hitting documentary Maafa21, which exposes what he calls the ongoing genocide of blacks worldwide by prominent establishment forces.


The controversial report, produced by the Kenyan government’s “population” minions and the UNFPA, claims that — despite dramatic declines in fertility over recent decades — authorities must do much more to bring the population down to “desirable” levels. Citing debunked claims about what the UN views as “too many” people supposedly resulting in a wide range of real and imagined problems, the radical document outlines numerous schemes to reduce the population. Among the suggested plots: more taxpayer-funded contraception, re-education, “empowering” women, reducing the “demand” for children, and more.
“One issue surrounds the realization of the policy objective of reducing total fertility rates from the current level of 4.6 to 2.6 children per woman by 2030,” observes the report, taking special aim at the poor. “This is because the demand for children is still high and is unlikely to change unless substantial changes in desired family sizes are achieved.” Incredibly, the document also states matter-of-factly that there is a “need for rapid decline in fertility.” Thus, the UN population-control zealots claimed, “the challenge is how to reduce the continued high demand for children.”
The more than 300-page report, dubbed “Kenya Population Situation Analysis,” does not explicitly call for abortion. However, experts say anyone versed in the UN’s deceptive bureaucratic language would see the real agenda clearly. For example, the document is packed with references to so-called “reproductive health” and “reproductive rights.” As then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton put it in a 2010 speech, “reproductive health includes contraception and family planning and access to legal, safe abortion.”
Despite occasional claims to the contrary, the Western establishment and the UN have been working fiendishly to promote abortion worldwide. The self-proclaimed goal of the UNFPA, displayed proudly on its website, is “achieving universal access to sexual and reproductive health (including family planning) and promoting reproductive rights.” In Communist China, the UNFPA and its co-conspirators at Planned Parenthood have even been implicated during congressional hearings in forced abortions.
Another common theme throughout the report on Kenya is the alleged “need” to prod women into delaying marriage, family, and child-bearing. Some of the proposed methods for achieving that goal include “education,” with a wide range of schemes admittedly aimed at brainwashing African women into having fewer children. “The achievement of lower fertility is complicated by differences between individual fertility preferences and desirable fertility levels,” the report explains. In other words, the UN knows better than African families.
“Investing” in what the UN calls “education” and “health,” the document continues, would “contribute to the attainment of more favorable demographic indicators.” The “favorable” outcomes the population-control zealots are seeking, according to the report, include “lower fertility through enhanced contraceptive use” and “lower ideal family size.” The document also advocates getting more women into the workforce and government-mandated changes in “gender roles” as a way to ensure fewer African births.
“Sustainable development requires Kenya to be in a position to proactively address, rather than only react to, the population trends that will unfold over the next decades,” the widely criticized UN report continues, alluding to another one of the international outfit’s controversial ploys — sustainability — to empower itself at the expense of liberty, humanity, and national independence. “Universal access to sexual and reproductive health is still being constrained by a number of factors that are economic, social and cultural. UNFPA is expected to be in the forefront in supporting implementation of the Reproductive Health Policy.”
As with coercive sterilization in India and forced abortions in China, American taxpayers are unwittingly helping to fund the radical UN efforts across Africa. Last year alone, for instance, U.S. taxpayers were forced into providing more than $30 million to the UNFPA. The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), meanwhile, spent almost $11 million of public funds in 2011 on “family planning” and “reproductive services” in Kenya. By comparison, it spent $60,000 on nutrition. With the Obama administration’s slavish devotion to Planned Parenthood, the UN, and the broader population-control agenda, those numbers are expected to continue rising unless Congress puts its foot down.
However, critics are already crying foul and demanding action to rein in official U.S. support for the atrocities. According to experts, U.S. government funding for the anti-population machinations is almost certainly in violation of U.S. law, which prohibits the funding of any entity engaged in coercive population-control plots. The same measure bars funding for any schemes that involve targets or quotas for birth numbers, such as the population-control regime being developed by the UNFPA and authorities in Kenya to drastically slash the fertility rate even further.
Population Research Institute (PRI) chief Steven Mosher, blasting the report’s premise as “insulting to women,” was among the experts suggesting that the scheme to reduce fertility down to a target of 2.6 children per woman violates U.S. law. “The Kenyan government, urged on by the UNFPA and USAID, is asserting the women of Kenya should not be allowed to make their own decisions regarding how many children to have, and should be re-educated into rejecting large families,” he observed, adding that because U.S. taxpayers provide millions for the schemes, the policy violates the federal law. “Such open targets for births and contraceptive acceptors are a clear violation of the Tiahrt Amendment. Congress ought to investigate.”
Of course, the same UN agency, along with the U.S. government-funded abortion behemoth Planned Parenthood, came under intense criticism last year during U.S. congressional hearings on even more serious violations. Among other concerns, the UNFPA and Planned Parenthood were accused by multiple experts of participating in the enforcement of the Communist Chinese regime’s brutal “one-child” policy. The draconian population regime set up by the mass-murdering dictatorship in Beijing often features gruesome forced abortions, reportedly assisted by UNFPA and Planned Parenthood.
Life Dynamics chief Mark Crutcher, who has played a key role in exposing the ongoing eugenics efforts aimed at blacks, also explained that the history behind such ploys goes back a long way. In a statement, Crutcher highlighted a 1974 document produced by the U.S. National Security Council and multiple other agencies and departments outlining the U.S. government’s official policies on world population. The document, known as National Security Study Memorandum 200, or NSSM 200, called for reducing third-world populations — specifically identifying abortion as a primary tool in the twisted mission.
Three outfits, including Planned Parenthood, founded by virulent racist and fiendish eugenicist Margaret Sanger, would be tasked with carrying out the plot. In 1970, then-Planned Parenthood boss and former American Eugenics Society vice-president Alan Guttmacher reportedly suggested that the UN should also be charged with implementing the agenda worldwide. “If you're going to curb population, it's extremely important not to have it done by the damned Yankees, but by the UN,” Guttmacher was quoted as saying. “Because the thing is, then it's not considered genocide.... If you can send in a colorful UN force, you've got much better leverage.”
While the U.S. government continues to foist ever greater sums of odious debts on the American people to fund the UN, Planned Parenthood, and oftentimes brutal population-control scheming, criticism of the controversial organizations and activities is steadily growing. Efforts to defund UNFPA and other outfits are accelerating as well. The UN, however, regularly blasted by critics as the “dictators' club,” remains as zealous as ever in its goal of reducing the world population — especially in Africa and the Third World. In the United States, analysts say, and data show, Planned Parenthood has been deliberately targeting blacks since its inception, too. With the outcry growing along with awareness of the schemes, however, critics of the population-control agenda are still hopeful that it can eventually be shut down.
Photo of Kenyan schoolchildren
Alex Newman, a foreign correspondent for The New American, is normally based in Europe. He can be reached at
anewman@thenewamerican.com
.
Related articles:

UN Slammed for Its Forced Abortions in China Using U.S. Funds
"Maafa 21" Exposes Black Genocide
U.S. & U.K. Taxpayers Funding Forced Sterilization in India
UN Pushes Population Control Agenda
U.S. Government Funds Rwandan Sterilization Campaign
China’s Population Police Force Mother to Abort Baby at Seven Months
Global ObamaCare and World Population Control
Seven Billion Milestone a Blessing Says Population Expert
Before Rio+20, Ted Turner Says Ban Plastic, Use UN to Slash Population
Science Group: UN Rio+20 Summit Must Reduce Global Population
Catholic Show Exposes Rockefeller Assault on Church, Life
George Soros Touts China as Leader of New World Order
Biden "Not Second-guessing" China's One-child Policy
Gates Foundation Pushing Dangerous Contraceptives on Black Populations
House Republicans Advance Vote to Defund UN Group
Pro-Life Billboards Highlight Eugenics
The Real Agenda Behind UN “Sustainability” Unmasked
 
Here's the other side of the story:



I don't know who is right and who is wrong. However, if these comments about the procedure of the catholic lab are true, then they absolutely screwed up. On the other hand, if the catholic group did not screw up their studies then that raises other questions. That would not prove that the tCG is bad, only that it is there. Then you need to question why it is there. To do that you should look for possible causes of which a sterilization program is one possible cause. However we have not even objectively confirmed that there is tCG. This is why you should not make such an opinion until a second independent study (and sometimes preferably a third) is done. The information is literally insufficient. To much chance of error on either side.

Read the article i posted before about this

They sent the vaccine to

4 DIFFERENT LABORATORIES THAT ALL SAID THE VACCINES CONTAINED THE STERILISING AGENT
http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-...terilize-women
 
Previous times they have been found putting sterilisation agents into vaccines

http://thinktwice.com/birthcon.htm

Are New Vaccines
Laced with Birth-Control Drugs?
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] During the early 1990s, the World Health Organization (WHO) had been overseeing massive vaccination campaigns against tetanus in a number of countries, among them Nicaragua, Mexico, and the Philippines. In October 1994, HLI received a communication from its Mexican affiliate, the Comite' Pro Vida de Mexico, regarding that country's anti-tetanus campaign. Suspicious of the campaign protocols, the Comite' obtained several vials of the vaccine and had them analyzed by chemists. Some of the vials were found to contain human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), a naturally occurring hormone essential for maintaining a pregnancy.[/FONT]​
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] hCG and Anti-hCG Antibodies[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] In nature the hCG hormone alerts the woman's body that she is pregnant and causes the release of other hormones to prepare the uterine lining for the implantation of the fertilized egg. The rapid rise in hCG levels after conception makes it an excellent marker for confirmation of pregnancy: when a woman takes a pregnancy test she is not tested for the pregnancy itself, but for the elevated presence of hCG.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] However, when introduced into the body coupled with a tetanus toxoid carrier, antibodies will be formed not only against tetanus but also against hCG. In this case the body fails to recognize hCG as a friend and will produce anti-hCG antibodies. The antibodies will attack subsequent pregnancies by killing the hCG which naturally sustains a pregnancy; when a woman has sufficient anti-hCG antibodies in her system, she is rendered incapable of maintaining a pregnancy.(1)[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] HLI reported the sketchy facts regarding the Mexican tetanus vaccines to its World Council members and affiliates in more than 60 countries.(2) Soon additional reports of vaccines laced with hCG hormones began to drift in from the Philippines, where more than 3.4 million women were recently vaccinated. Similar reports came from Nicaragua, which had conducted its own vaccination campaign in 1993.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] The Known Facts[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] Here are the known facts concerning the tetanus vaccination campaigns in Mexico and the Philippines:[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] * Only women are vaccinated, and only the women between the ages of 15 and 45. (In Nicaragua the age range was 12-49.) But aren't men at least as likely as young women to come into contact with tetanus? And what of the children? Why are they excluded?[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif]* Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) hormone has been found in the vaccines. It does not belong there -- in the parlance of the O.J. Simpson murder trial, the vaccine has been "contaminated."[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif]* The vaccination protocols call for multiple injections -- three within three months and a total of five altogether. But, since tetanus vaccinations provide protection for ten years or more, why are multiple inoculations called for?(3)[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif]* WHO has been actively involved for more than 20 years in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG tied to tetanus toxoid as a carrier -- the exact same coupling as has been found in the Mexican-Philippine-Nicaragua vaccines.(4)[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] The Anti-Fertility Gang[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] Allied with the WHO in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine (AFV) using hCG with tetanus and other carriers have been UNFPA, the UN Development Programme (UNDP), the World Bank, the Population Council, the Rockefeller Foundation, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, and a number of universities, including Uppsala, Helsinki, and Ohio State.(5) The U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (part of NIH) was the supplier of the hCG hormone in some of the AFV experiments.(6)[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif]The WHO begain its "Special Programme" in human reproduction in 1972, and by 1993 had spent more than $356 million on "reproductive health" research.(7) It is this "Programme" which has pioneered the development of the abortificant vaccine. Over $90 million of this Programme's funds were contributed by Sweden; Great Britain donated more than $52 million, while Norway, Denmark and Germany kicked in for $41 million , $27 million, and $12 million, respectively. The U.S., thanks to the cut-off of such funding during the Reagan-Bush administrations, has contributed "only" $5.7 million, including a new payment in 1993 by the Clinton administration of $2.5 million. Other major contibutors to the WHO Programme include UNFPA, $61 million; the World Bank, $15.5 million; the Rockefeller Foundation, $2.5 million; the Ford Foundation, over $1 million; and the IDRC (International Research and Development Centre of Canada), $716.5 thousand.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] WHO and Philippine Health Department Excuses[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] When the first reports surfaced in the Philippines of tetanus toxoid vaccine being laced with hCG hormones, the WHO and the Philippine Department of Health (DOH) immediately denied that the vaccine contained hCG. Confronted with the results of laboratory tests which detected its presence in three of the four vials of tetanus toxoid examined, the WHO and DOH scoffed at the evidence coming from "right-to-life and Catholic" sources. Four new vials of the tetanus vaccine were submitted by DOH to St. Luke's (Lutheran) Medical Center in Manila -- and all four vials tested positive for hCG![/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif]From outright denial the stories now shifted to the allegedly "insignificant" quantity of the hCG present; the volume of hCG present is insufficient to produce anti-hCG antibodies.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif]But new tests designed to detect the presence of hCG antibodies in the blood sera of women vaccinated with the tetauns toxoid vaccine were undertaken by Philippine pro-life and Catholic groups. Of thirty women tested subsequent to receiving tetanus toxoid vaccine, twenty-six tested positive for high levels of anti-hCG! If there were no hCG in the vaccine, or if it were present in only "insignificant" quantities, why were the vaccinated women found to be harboring anti-hCG antibodies? The WHO and the DOH had no answers.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif]New arguments surfaced: hCG's apparent presence in the vaccine was due to "false positives" resulting from the particular substances mixed in the vaccine or in the chemicals testing for hCG. And even if hCG was really there, its presence derived from the manufacturing process.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif]But the finding of hCG antibodies in the blood sera of vaccinated women obviated the need to get bogged down in such debates. It was no longer necessary to argue about what may or may not have been the cause of the hCG presence, when one now had the effect of the hCG. There is no known way for the vaccinated women to have hCG antibodies in their blood unless hCG had been artificially introduced into their bodies![/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] Why A Tetanus Toxoid "Carrier"?[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] Because the human body does not attack its own naturally occurring hormone hCG, the body has to be fooled into treating hCG as an invading enemy in order to develop a successful anti-fertility vaccine utilizing hCG antibodies. A paper delivered at the 4th International Congress of Reproductive Immunology (Kiel, West Germany, 26-29 July 1989) spelled it out: "Linkage to a carrier was done to overcome the immunological tolerance to hCG."(8)[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] Vaccine Untested by Drug Bureau[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] After the vaccine controversy had reached a fever pitch, a new bombshell exploded; none of the three different brands of tetanus vaccine being used had ever been licensed for sale and distribution or registered with the Philippine Bureau of Food and Drugs (BFAD), as required by law. The head of the BFAD lamely explained that the companies distributing these brands "did not apply for registration."(9) The companies in question are Connaught Laboratories Ltd. and Intervex, both from Canada, and CSL Laboratories from Australia.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif]It seemed that the BFAD might belatedly require re-testing, but the idea was quickly rejected when the Secretary of Health declared that, since the vaccines had been certified by the WHO -- there they are again! -- there was assurance enough that the "vaccines come from reputable manufacturers."(10)[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] Just how "reputable" one of the manufacturers might be is open to some question. In the mid-`80s Connaught Laboratories was found to be knowingly distributing vials of AIDS-contaminated blood products.(11) [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif]Epilogue[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] At this juncture, evidence is beginning to appear from Africa.(12) HLI has called for a Congressional investigation of the situation, inasmuch as nearly every agency involved in the development of an anti-fertility vaccine is funded, at least in part, with U.S. monies.[/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] [/FONT]

[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] [/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif]NOTES:[/FONT][FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] [FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] (1) "Abortifacient vaccines loom as new threat," HLI Reports, November 1993, pp. 1-2.[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif][FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif](2) World Council Reports, 28 November 1994, pp. 4-5.[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif][FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif](3) A call placed by this writer on 5 May 1995 to the Montgomery County (Maryland) Health Department, Epidemology Division -- Infectious Diseases -- Adult Immunizations, elicited the following information:[/FONT][/FONT]
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif][FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif]Q. For how long a time does the tetanus vaccination offer protection?
A. 10 years.
Q. Have you ever heard of any adult requiring three tetanus vaccinations within a 3 or 4 month time period, and a total of 5 vaccinations in all within a year or so?
A. Whaaaat! Never. No way!
[/FONT]
[/FONT]​
[FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif][FONT=Arial, helvetica, sans-serif] Reports from the Philippines appear to confirm the 10-year immunity afforded by tetanus toxoid vaccinations: prior to the campaigns begun in 1993, the so-called booster shots were given only every 10 years.(4) More than a score of articles, many written by WHO researchers, document WHO's attempts to create an anti-fertility vaccine utilizing tetanus toxoid as a carrier. Some leading articles include:
"Clinical profile and Toxicology Studies on Four Women Immunized with Pr-B-hCG-TT," Contraception, February, 1976, pp. 253-268."Observations on the antigenicity and clinical effects of a candidate antipregnancy vaccine: B-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin linked to tetanus toxoid," Fertility and Sterility, October 1980, pp. 328-335.
"Phase 1 Clinical Trials of a World Health Organisation Birth Control Vaccine," The Lancet, 11 June 1988, pp. 1295-1298. "Vaccines for Fertility Regulation," Chapter 11, pp. 177-198, Research in Human Reproduction, Biennial Report (1986-1987), WHO Special Programme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction (WHO, Geneva 1988).
"Anti-hCG Vaccines are in Clinical Trials," Scandinavian Journal of Immunology, Vol. 36, 1992, pp. 123-126.
(5) These institutional names are garnered from the journal articles cited in the previous footnote.(6) Lancet, 11 June 1988, p. 1296.
(7) Challenges in Reproductive Health Research, Biennial Report 1992-1993, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1994, p. 186.
(8) G.P. Talwar, et al, "Prospects of an anti-hCG vaccine inducing antibodies of high affinity...(etc)," Reproductive Technology 1989, Elsevier Science Publishers, 1990, Amsterdam, New York, p. 231.
(9) "3 DOH vaccines untested by BFAD," The Philippine Star, 4 April 1995, pp. 1, 12.
(10) "BFAD junks re-testing of controversial shot," Manila Standard, 7 April 1995; "DOH: Toxoid vaccines are safe," The Philippine Star, 7 April 1995.
(11) "Ottawa got blood tainted by HIV." Ottawa Citizen, 4 April 1995.
(12) A nearly two-year old communique from Tanzania tells a familiar story: tetanus toxoid vaccinations, five in all, given only to women aged 15-45. Nigeria, too, may have been victimized; see The Lancet, 4 June 1988, p. 1273.
Credit: Copyright June/July 1995 by James A. Miller, special correspondent for Human Life International. This article was originally published in HLI Reports, Human Life International, Gaithersburg, Maryland; June/July 1995, Volume 13, Number 8. Permission to reprint granted to Thinktwice/New Atlantean Press.
[/FONT]
[/FONT]
 
Back
Top