Expose the Anti-Trump movement.

Perhaps you need to clarify what your intended purpose is? This is a forum after all...a place for discussion and I have yet to see one of your threads go completely off the rails. You just don't like that many of the members tend to swing more towards the liberal side. Also, I wasn't speaking as an admin, if I were, I would have used the mod note tags and I don't have time to babysit every single thread. I do have a life outside of the forum--I work full-time plus overtime, am working on my bachelor's degree, and have 3 kids. None of us are on here 24/7, that's why we have the report feature.
The intent was stated in the op. But you know that and are deliberately being daft to support your clear bias in the matter. Sorry I don't have any personal issue with You, please understand that. But, let's be up front and honest out of respect for a difference of opinion.
And yes I do have an issue with liberals, Ive stated that pretty clearly. They use lies, temper tantrums, violence... all to get what they want. Currently directing America towards a civil war. So what's not to like you know?
 
The intent was stated in the op. But you know that and are deliberately being daft to support your clear bias in the matter. Sorry I don't have any personal issue with You, please understand that. But, let's be up front and honest out of respect for a difference of opinion.
And yes I do have an issue with liberals, Ive stated that pretty clearly. They use lies, temper tantrums, violence... all to get what they want. Currently directing America towards a civil war. So what's not to like you know?

If it's OK for you to attack the character of people with different opinions in that way, rather than by addressing their arguments, then I don't understand how you can have an objection to anyone attacking the character of Trump. Maybe it's typical of the character of conservatives like yourself to adopt double standards?
 
If it's OK for you to attack the character of people with different opinions in that way, rather than by addressing their arguments, then I don't understand how you can have an objection to anyone attacking the character of Trump. Maybe it's typical of the character of conservatives like yourself to adopt double standards?
Funny. Double standards are the domain of the socialist party. Maybe that will change but not for now.
I have no issue with people attacking Trump for real issues. Are quite a few. But when people pull b.s. out of the air and try to attach it to him...Ill call them out. Just like Hillary and the pizzagate bs.
 
Funny. Double standards are the domain of the socialist party. Maybe that will change but not for now.
I have no issue with people attacking Trump for real issues. Are quite a few. But when people pull b.s. out of the air and try to attach it to him...Ill call them out. Just like Hillary and the pizzagate bs.

So you are a socialist person then?
 
I do like seeing any political view point get called out on their bs, so I want to be on record as supporting this thread. Politicians are bad no matter what their label.
 
What is the Anti-Trump Movement though?
I honestly do not know how anyone could not know this. Watch CNN, MsNBC, the protest rallies at Berkley and the like.
 
Really? You are going to devolve into this mindset?
Meh.

Why do you object to others forming arguments on the basis of character when it's something you constantly do yourself? Liberals are this, liberals are that... liberals are cry babies, liberals are liars, liberals are brainwashed... you never stop. Since it's clearly a style of argument you favour, I thought you would be fine with people approaching Trump in this way. At least, if you're prepared to constantly act this way yourself, it doesn't seem fair of you to criticise others for it, does it?
 
Why do you object to others forming arguments on the basis of character when it's something you constantly do yourself? Liberals are this, liberals are that... liberals are cry babies, liberals are liars, liberals are brainwashed... you never stop. Since it's clearly a style of argument you favour, I thought you would be fine with people approaching Trump in this way. At least, if you're prepared to constantly act this way yourself, it doesn't seem fair of you to criticise others for it, does it?
You have such an impressive way of addressing the issues Mr Invisible! Thank you for your consistent and clear minded posts.

I am ant-Trump, I am not whining or complaining and am quite impressed that he won the election. Hats of the the FSB and the FBI!

Personally I think it better for the country that he, with his obvious hypocrisy (eg being against the global banking conspiracy and then appoint the goldmansach executive team to run the treasury) than a more polished gop-er. He and his crew are a lightening rod for the nation's disaffected. I believe something very good will come of it...if he doesn't get us all killed.
 
Last edited:
Why do you object to others forming arguments on the basis of character when it's something you constantly do yourself? Liberals are this, liberals are that... liberals are cry babies, liberals are liars, liberals are brainwashed... you never stop. Since it's clearly a style of argument you favour, I thought you would be fine with people approaching Trump in this way. At least, if you're prepared to constantly act this way yourself, it doesn't seem fair of you to criticise others for it, does it?
I have the benefit of proof for the things I say. Why would I call you a conservative when I know you are not?
 
I have the benefit of proof for the things I say. Why would I call you a conservative when I know you are not?

Other people believe just as strongly as you that they have proof for what they say about Trump. For example, he excludes people from the US on the basis of race, therefore he is discriminating against people for their race, and is racist. He "grabs women in the pussy", and treats them like a sex object rather than a human being, therefore he is a sexist. As character assassination goes, those are pretty clear and reasonable "proofs".

So why is it OK for you and not for others? You say that this kind of hypocrisy is typical of socialists rather than conservatives, but you aren't a socialist, are you? Then maybe this kind of hypocrisy is just typical of you personally?
 
Mr @Eventhorizon , your arguments are hollow, your proofs are specious and as for your methods
 
Other people believe just as strongly as you that they have proof for what they say about Trump. For example, he excludes people from the US on the basis of race, therefore he is discriminating against people for their race, and is racist. He "grabs women in the pussy", and treats them like a sex object rather than a human being, therefore he is a sexist. As character assassination goes, those are pretty clear and reasonable "proofs".

So why is it OK for you and not for others? You say that this kind of hypocrisy is typical of socialists rather than conservatives, but you aren't a socialist, are you? Then maybe this kind of hypocrisy is just typical of you personally?
Hmmm this is interesting. I dont see the correlation you are trying to suggest.
Shall we try a thought experiment if you don't mind. Warning, you will have to accept that what I am telling you regarding the way I think is true. Care to try?
 
Hmmm this is interesting. I dont see the correlation you are trying to suggest.
Shall we try a thought experiment if you don't mind. Warning, you will have to accept that what I am telling you regarding the way I think is true. Care to try?
 
I just performed a thought experiment on you. Your response proves everything I've ever said regarding any topic. Your mind has officially been erased. You will never make sense again and I am forever right. I just did you a big favor. You're welcome.
Yeah but.... first you didn't ask and second my original question was not directed at you.
 
Back
Top