Expose the Anti-Trump movement.

I believe the anti-Trump movement is gaining considerable momentum, and will continue to do so.
Thanks to fake news and a clear attempt to sabotage his Presidency which should be considered on par with treason. Imagine if people had done this with Obama even though he had clear terrorist links.
 
Can you give me somd links? You've been spending time there long enough to make a statement like that you should be able to provide them quickly.
I think it's funny how liberals are talking about being upset with Trump for suggesting better relations with Russia. That after Obama destroyed them for being someone Putin wouldn't even give the time of day out of lack of respect.

Well, the ones that I do know of are in Russian or other languages you would not understand :) can't point to good English ones at the moment. Will keep you informed.
 
Be a dear and Google it for me.

EegBnoi.png


:m075:
zMfKG
 
Well, the ones that I do know of are in Russian or other languages you would not understand :) can't point to good English ones at the moment. Will keep you informed.
So your original statement was that I go there and find lots of friends. Now you are saying they only speak Russian. How exactly will I find lots of friends if they only speak Russian?
Hey... if you look hard enough you can find lots of places on the internet that prove without doubt Obama was a space alien. The only problem is that all the text is in alien and if you don't know how to read it you are out of luck. But trust me...TRUST me, Obama absolutely is a space alien....
 
We polled the areas with the heaviest density of liberals and asked them if they approved of Trump or not. Guess what!? The majority of them did not!
 
We polled the areas with the heaviest density of liberals and asked them if they approved of Trump or not. Guess what!? The majority of them did not!

He was even less popular than Hillary Clinton ffs.

Edit: Also sure, the heaviest density of liberals also happens to correlate with the highest population density period. So unless you limited your poll to only rural areas you're going to get the same results.
 
You can just stare at each other looking puzzled, like in real life.
ты напоминаешь мне небольшой куриной прямо перед его доводят до убоя
 
(Besides this not being a neutral source, I read it.)
These sources came out and made corrections. They were shown false or misleading. While disappointing, I agree that there are a lot of media sources that are not objective. They all should be. We shouldn't have any media outlets pandering to one ideology or the other. But there isn't anything published that has actually hurt Trump more than the truth has hurt him. Trump is not a victim of anything former presidents have not encountered... But we live in a social media age where everything travels fast. The hysteria about an anti Trump movement is unwarranted.
 
Last edited:
(Besides this not being a neutral source, I read it.)
These sources came out and made corrections. They were shown false or misleading. I agree that there are a lot of media sources that are not objective. They all should be. We shouldn't have any media outlets pandering to one ideology or the other. But there isn't anything published that has actually hurt Trump more than the truth has hurt him. Trump is not a victim of anything former presidents have not encountered... But we live in a social media age where everything travels fast. The hysteria about an anti Trump movement is unwarranted.
I agree with most of this with the exception of what has hurt Trump and what has not. If anything I hope this era is waking people up to just how aggressive news is in demonizing and attempts to damage the candidate they don't like. They have been caught blatantly lying and helping their candidate of choice. I would really love to believe this leads to change where we get more accurate news but... we all know most humans have short attention spans.
 
I think you are having a discussion with yourself. You started saying one thing and are now on a different tangent again. Why call me a socialist when you know I am not. Your original response amounts to "I know you are but what am i." As much as I miss my youth I have no desire to revisit the playground.

I asked if you were a socialist because you said double standards are the domain of socialists, but you're displaying your double standards by creating an ENTIRE thread complaining about other people doing what you do ALL THE TIME.

Maybe you were wrong about double standards being the domain of socialists. Maybe it's because you're conservative that you have double standards. Is that the case? Or maybe it's not typical of conservatives? Maybe it's just you who are a hypocrite?

On the other hand, if you aren't a hypocrite, you claim that you have special proof that justifies your continual personal type ad hominem attacks on liberals. What is different about your proof that makes it better than the proof liberals have for attacking Trump? How did you get this more reliable type of proof, and how do you know it's more reliable?
 
Thanks to fake news and a clear attempt to sabotage his Presidency which should be considered on par with treason. Imagine if people had done this with Obama even though he had clear terrorist links.

Waaaaa, boo hoo hoo, typical Eventhorizon, crying like a little cry baby over others saying hurty things about his precious little leader. Poor little Trumpy can't stand up to all the mean bullies. Stop crying and accept that other people have different thoughts to you.
 
I asked if you were a socialist because you said double standards are the domain of socialists, but you're displaying your double standards by creating an ENTIRE thread complaining about other people doing what you do ALL THE TIME.

Maybe you were wrong about double standards being the domain of socialists. Maybe it's because you're conservative that you have double standards. Is that the case? Or maybe it's not typical of conservatives? Maybe it's just you who are a hypocrite?

On the other hand, if you aren't a hypocrite, you claim that you have special proof that justifies your continual personal type ad hominem attacks on liberals. What is different about your proof that makes it better than the proof liberals have for attacking Trump? How did you get this more reliable type of proof, and how do you know it's more reliable?
The "proof" that the liberal media provides is often disproven in short order. Just recently CNN being caught in a lie nd also providing their candidate with questions before asking them as just some examples. The same can't be said of nonleft leaning entities. I'm sure you can dig up a few instances here or there but nothing the extent of the lying left media.
I do subscribe to some conservative values but many conservatives would shun me...and actually do to include some of my relatives because of what I believe is right and wrong.
The only thing I am interested in is logic, reason, fact and truth. I pay little attention to what people want to be true.

Previously you asked why I dont just leave. I understand that I upset you. But I will not stop giving my perspective. Perhaps one day logic and reason will win out in someone's mind and I will have had a hand in that. Perhaps not. In any case remember that if I really am that much of an affront to You, I can always be blocked and that way you can retreat back into your safe space.
Or consider that maybe it's you who are not thinking of all the different sides there are to things.

Don't talk to me of hyprocracy. That is the left's domain. It's ok to be violent when we want things but it's not ok when you are trying to protect America!
 
Back
Top