Why don't women make the first move?

I understand that if you've had bad experiences you personally may want to hold back a little on being the 'chaser' but why is the responsibility of romantic gestures on the man's shoulders in general? Wanting equal effort put into the relationship is great but always expecting the guy to do it suggests more than personal preference.

I think you're right about the transaction part. Unfortunately alot of the time we seem to think that because men may have a greater desire for sex, men have to 'earn' sex by being romantic, while women play the roles of auctioneers trying to get the most value in exchange. Guys who might not want to make the first move are not necessarily going to be bad partners. They may have misunderstood the woman's intentions, thought she was 'out of their league' or just too introverted to risk rejection. None of those suggest a lack of caring.

I know men and women aren't the same but men want to feel loved and valued too and women do enjoy sex as well, so what's wrong with dropping rules for who's allowed to do what? It would benefit everyone.

I think the question isn't who should make the first move, it's what is the optimal setting for romance. Because the idea that a person should make the first move is a bit ludicrous- especially if it is two strangers. The reality is it's best when both people obviously feel the spark and both put out energy. I think the premise creates the flaw.
 
I think the question isn't who should make the first move, it's what is the optimal setting for romance. Because the idea that a person should make the first move is a bit ludicrous- especially if it is two strangers. The reality is it's best when both people obviously feel the spark and both put out energy. I think the premise creates the flaw.

Yep. A mutual thing. Should flow. :love:
 
It is obvious that men are not equal to women in this regard, Women are privileged.
I wonder what other ways they are privileged.

I wouldn't even call it privilege. If you are an attractive woman and men find you appealing you have the pick of the litter every single time. An attractive man can be in the same position. The only reason we hear more about beautiful women having lots of choices is because men and women approach sex differently. Men are often very overt with their sexuality, we do not know how to express ourselves sexually, so more often than not we resort to catcalling, or complimenting her on her tits. At the same time, society has men thinking we should be ashamed of our sexuality, and coupled with the fear of rejection, it can be hard to show a woman you are sexually interested in her.

I would argue that women enjoy sex more than men, they get more out of it. So while it seems that men think about sex a lot, women in the end enjoy dicks in their bodies more than we enjoy putting them there.
 
I don't do any first moves because I'm very shy and even if I would, I don't think the guy would be interested in me. Most likely self-esteem problem. My boyfriend actually did the first move.
 
Maybe men should strike?
 
The more I read this thread, the more I think everyone is just in fucked up relationships or have had a lot of fucked up experiences and that is colouring their perceptions of who should and should not pursue and whether or not they themselves would be the pursuer.
 
I think the question isn't who should make the first move, it's what is the optimal setting for romance. Because the idea that a person should make the first move is a bit ludicrous- especially if it is two strangers. The reality is it's best when both people obviously feel the spark and both put out energy. I think the premise creates the flaw.

True. I'm no expert on dating (or women for that matter). I love the idea of having a girlfriend but the idea of dating is kinda terrifying. I'm kind of relying on outside sources rather than my own experiences and I get really conflicting messages. You can't be too direct but need to make your intentions clear. Can't be too arrogant but should be confident. You shouldn't be bossy but should take the initiative. You're best off being friends with her first but then trying to turn it into something more can be seen as not being honest. You should be nice but not too nice. Everything is a perfect medium that differs for every woman. It's a cliché but I think I'm best off being myself but what if being myself precludes me from making the first move (shyness/nerves)?

I'm sure there's a happy medium but I know I'll be nervous and any brilliant plan I might have will go out the window the second she looks at me.

All that said, I think the idea of guys making the first move comes from bars or nightclubs which isn't exactly my scene. I'm probably better off being friends with girls first and meeting women through those friends in more relaxed settings (i.e. not surrounded by drink and loud, crap music) as opposed to approaching strangers in bars. I'd probably be better at that too.
 
Last edited:
I think a reminder that people exist in spectrum should be made? .__.

Not every men / women make / don't make the first move-- and not every of them enjoys it.

I agreed with the first few responses that it might have been an issue of self-confidence or self-worth (that seems to be what it is to me, and I'm physically male), but at the same time, gender roles play within....what responses or actions were acceptable (or rather, receives the LEAST punishment)

I don't think gender equality has been achieved here-- and the point first raised is indeed, one point of that. The stigma over men who don't make the first move and/or women who make the first move are higher for both sides-- while I think aggression and passivity (as far as dating / getting to know each other is concerned) exist in both genders.

But within a personal scope; there's shyness, there's lack of self worth; there might just be a general distaste of initiating on its own?
I dunno.
 
This thread is really an extension of the 'is feminism outdated' thread

In that other thread i posted a talk by warren farrel in which he raises the point that women have the power of refusal over men who are expected to make the first move

I thought it was an intersting train of thought

I also agree with him that the idea of 'power' needs to be redefined. For example is it 'powerful' to be a slave to work all your life and to not get a good work/life balance? Whats the point of being money rich but time poor for example? Women, farrel points out, are often better at gettting a good balance and are therefore he argues more empowered then many men

This is a trap many men are caught in perhaps due to cultural pressures and conditioning and i think it needs a re-think

I raised farrels point about women having refusal power over men in that thread but no one picked up on it! So i thought i'd give it it's own thread

I've found it interesting to hear peoples views and particularly the womens views. Many appreciate that it is a tough aspect of the male experience but at the samer time they like it that way

I think there are others areas that would be worth exploring relating to these issues fior example the female commentator that someone else posted a video of in that thread said that women dressed to impress other women NOT men. Well i agree with her. But i would say that how we act and dress is a form of communication. We also know that men are visually stimulated so if a woman dresses in a sexy way to impress other women she should i think be aware that she is also going to have an impact on men who might missinterprete her physical communication as a signal that she is single and looking for male attention

This is a problem when men have to make the first move because there are now lots of women putting out sexyness signals that men will interprete a certain way and yet when the man goes to make a move the woman acts all indignant and says ''leave me alone and stop harassing me'' (whilst possibly lambasting men for being sex crazed pigs or whatever)
@charlene raises this point about female dress above

This issue blew up into the mainstream not that long ago when a police chief said that women should dress more conservatively when walking around at night lest they draw negative attention from males; this caused a massive backlash from women who marched in protest claiming their right to dress like 'sluts'!

Clearly they hadn't stopped to consider whether they should be dressing like sluts in the first place

men know that they shouldn't dress certain ways particularly when walking through certain areas for example in my county if you walk through the wrong area wearing certain football team colours then you are liable to get your head kicked in or be stabbed so i'm not sure why women seem to think they should get all these special rules to apply just for them whilst at the same time droning on about 'equality'

I also think this recent feminist view that women have been oppressed for centuries is nonsense. They are failing to look at the historic context. It's only recently that we switched to a 'service economy' where jobs have become suitable for women. Before that the work during the agricultural and industrial revolutions was dirty, dangerous and brutal and i think the women at home managing the household were probably appreciative of the graft their fella was putting in to support the family down the mines, or in the fields, docks or factories

I think if you went back in time and asked those women if they thought they were being 'oppressed' i think they'd laugh!

The service economy has provided a space in the work environment for women but there is a problem with that situation. It is not a real economy...it is a house of cards because it is not built on producing things like a 'manufacturing economy'. It is built on debt and money printing neither of which are sustainable and unfortunatly the economic problems we are now seeing which are only going to deepen are the chickens coming home to roost on the service economy

There is however a ray of light in that mechanisation is advancing apace which could mean that the brutal aspect of work can be carried out by machines meaning we only need apply brain power which enables both men and women to work on a level playing field as equals

There is a danger however with mechanisation in that if we do not manage to restructure our political and economic set up and decentralise power down to the people then the centralised power people will use machines to subjugate humanity NOT to liberate them from work

Thi is why as we enter the mechanisation (robotisation and computerisation) age we must, also as well as creating a workplace environment favourable to both men and women, take the power of decsion making back of the power elites and place it in the hands of the common man and woman

But i strongly feel that as we transition to this new phase in order to achieve what i've outlined above women must not allow themselves to be manipulated into feeling persecuted by men when in fact men have been breaking their backs for centuries for the good of our species as a whole and they have certainly not been enjoying an easier life than women


What do you mean by oppressed?

I think many people all around the world have been oppressed for a long time, and still are. In many societies, there was an aristocratic class, and then those classes that served them. For a long chunk of modern and ancient history, some people were seen as inherently inferior to other people. And women were seen as inferior to men. Many of the men were seen as chattel and property. And women were seen as chattel and property in many parts of the world. Many people around the world were not allowed to vote, contribute to government, own land, inherit land, or have access to education. Many women were not allowed to vote, contribute to government, own land, inherit, or have access to education. Women and men in many parts of the world had no recourse against things like harassment, rape, and violence. Many people were not allowed to live free and find their own way, but were forced to serve the system that they had been born into...were owned by.
These cultures do not reflect the inherent state of humanity, but what happens when we live in a society where some people believe that they are inherently superior to other people, and other people believe that they are probably inherently inferior to the people that have subjugated them. This is what happens when people are enculturalised to believe that power comes from fear, taking and separating, rather than understanding and cooperating.

Currently, there are still people that believe men and women are not equal. That men and women are 'opposites', have conflicting agendas, and that relationships between men and women will be fraught with inevitable power plays, and that relationships are where two people collaborate, yet compete with each other simultaneously.
Some people believe that people are basically animals that are controlled by their survival instincts. Some people believe that humans are inherently evil or flawed. Some people believe that the world will never be a better place, and will only get worse. Some people believe that life itself is pointless, yet will desperately and robotically continue to survive until they die. Some people believe that they have no power or personal responsibility. Some people believe that they are worthless. Some people believe everything that their aristocracy tells them. Some people never question why things are done, and if they can be done differently. Some people will loyally defend the hand that feed them and beats them , because that is all they know. Some people only want to hear what they already think. Some people have a desperate need to be superior. Some people always think they are inferior. Some people are afraid, afraid to die, afraid to live, afraid of life, of other people, and the world itself.

People...because we form our reality from the inside out...will be attracted to cultural beliefs that are similar to their own inner state. Just because a lot of people hold a certain view doesn't mean the view is correct, inherent, natural, healthy, or effective. People and ideas are popular not because they are correct or make sense, but because they appeal to other people that hold similar views. Popular does not equate to right. Most of the time, especially in an unhealthy society where many people are sick and miserable, popular equates to unhealthy.

There are many things we continuously take for granted, that are not necessarily 'real' or permanant states. We talk about concepts like 'men' and 'women', and 'relationships', but what do we really mean when we say these things?
Is there a typical man, woman, or relationship? Would it be an approximation we could come to by averaging it out? The mean, mode, or median perhaps?
We talk about these concepts as if they are real permanent things, but most of our ideas are based on changing data and perceptions.

I think that currently, many of our cultures and societies are unhealthy. And that many people are unhealthy. And that many relationships are unhealthy.
Many people cannot tell the difference between Love and fear. And many people believe that answers and reality come from external sources, rather than the internal source. Many people do not trust themselves, their mind...their spirit, their life.

Can men and women put their humanity before their sexual organs? I believe that they most certainly can, and would do, if they were not so caught up in patterns of fear and cultural conditioning.

It is hard to say 'what women want' or 'what men want'. Its hard to know what other people want. It is easier and much more practical to work out what i want for myself, on a personal level. Know what you want, and why.

I certainly do not pretend to speak for all women, I speak only for myself.
I dont think that my personal beliefs and views are shared by many other women. In fact, I know that many women, and many men disagree with my beliefs and views.
I say this from the bottom of my heart, I am literally in love with the majority of the women on this forum. Truly. I have never before encountered so many women that I relate to, that I feel I can connect to, understand, and sincerely learn from. They have made me fall in love with myself and the state of being a 'woman'.

But generally speaking, I don't know that many women that I think are similar to me, or that I relate to on a life level.

My personal and humble opinion is that the given 'approacher' in a society is likely to be more empowered.
I dont know if men would really like to live in a society that was reversed, where women did the majority of the approaching.
In my opinion, an evolved society would treat 'approaching' as a non issue, and both sexes would feel comfortable to communicate and connect without fear.

When I was younger, I went out to 'town' a lot with my friends from several difference circles. We would go to bars, night clubs, concerts, cultural events etc. My objective when going out was simply experience. I am curious and like to meet people and see places, do fun and weird intersting things. I made a lot of friends during this time, and very occasionally, had sexual dalliances. Some of my friends had other objectives, and they would get dressed up to the nines and literally be out to scope out guys for flirting and relationships. I cant adequately describe how it feels to be in a group of girls and have a group of guys trying to pick them up. My best friend is a real traffic stopping beauty, and she was one of the worst flirts I have ever encountered (isn't like that any more). It was my self appointed job on some nights to ensure she and other girls would get home safely. I would watch in morbid fascination and horror while she and others would stand there in subtle obvious poses and wait to get noticed. She would get increasingly agitated, sad, and bitchy if she wasn't approached, and assumed she hadnt worn the right dress or something. There would be girls in the same painful to watch position all around the room. Or otherwise, she would give a coy smile, and a guy or guys would approach. They would immediately engage in brain numbing want to throw myself of a cliff in boredom dull saccharine cheesy flirty small talk and...bragging...i drive this car, I bought this gadget, I work out everyday.....The guy would offer to buy drinks. Sometimes they bought drinks for the whole group. She would let them buy her drink after drink, flirt painfully, and then...one of the following things would likely occur:
-they would flirt, she would get increasingly drunk and clumsy, sometimes sick and throwing up, and I would drag her away before anyone could advance on her.
-they would make increasingly sexual advances that she would fend off. They would get very annoyed, because they had just wasted time, money, and effort (wasted their night, some said) trying to ply a girl that they had thought had been a 'sure thing' with alcohol.
Some people see buying a drink as buying sexual favours, and in some cases and social circles...that is true. (And some go straight for for the kill and spike drinks)
- she would reciprocate the sexual advances and they would stay together that night, she would try to maintain his attention while glaring at other attractive girls near by. They would kiss goodnight, and then she would wait the next day, hoping he called her.
- -she would reciprocate the sexual advances and would leave with the guy. Occasionally, I would hear from her later, and she would ask us to find her because the guy had left, or she was other wise stranded and lonely. Other times i heard from her the next day, and she would wait anxiously for him to call her. And get very upset if he didnt.

Obviously all pubs, clubs, and women and men are not like this. Many are not. But I have seen my fair share of this sleazy scene. Women all dressed up trying to attract attention, trying to stand out to compete with their 'competition'. Men walking around strutting like bloody peacocks and bison lol trying to appear cool and suave and dominant. Walk into the women's bathroom, find someone throwing up in the toilet, some girl crying with girls standing around saying something like' he's not worth it', a couple having sex in the disabled toilet, a line of women repairing their makeup in the mirror hogging the sink space while I wait to wash my hands.

There is one particular night I remember vividly because it was the last one I had with particular friends. That sleazy scene had played out to the very extreme. One of my friends had been throwing up and another had her date leave with another girl. A fight had broken out with some guys, and some girl purposefully threw her drink over another girl's dress. I was bored shitless and disgusted by the sorry state of humanity I had witnessed...just wanted to go home so I could relax and finally enjoy my night with a shower and a cup of tea. The sick one was cold, because she had obviously dressed without first consulting her common sense and the weather report, lol unlike some other people. I had to give her my beloved cardigan to wear because her vagina was clearly freezing and my other friend was limping around like a hobbled horse in her shoes invented by some arsehole that hated feet and did not understand the nature of walking. We were waiting at the taxi rank, when lo and behold the friends of the guy that had abandoned his date with my friend appear. I had known them from school. They made pointless and annoying small talk, I complained about how stupid the nightclub was and how I was never going there again, and my friend tried to put on a brave whimpering face, and I realised that there was spew on my cardigan. Then one of them says ( and i am entirely serious here, there is no exaggeration) 'you know charlene, if you started wearing some nicer clothes, straightened you hair, got some high heels and did your make up, I think you'd would be hot and better guys would like you than your gay up himself boyfriend'. I was lost for words....snorted...and just stared at him in my best evil glare until he pissed off. And then I could only laugh...the places and things we do for the sake of our friends sometimes.

I think the way things are sometimes...it has the vibe of a meat market. In some contexts, the women are the goods, and the men are the shoppers. What would you rather, be the chooser, or the chosen? Be proactive and go forward to what you want, or stand back and wait and hope for the best. Waiting sounds crap...i dont really understand why someone would wait and see, if they could just get up and know for sure.
Who gets more choice in this context? And within that system, what about women that arent attractive? And men that are shy?
If it was reversed, it would be just as ugly and hideous and stupid as it is now.

Connecting with people doesn't have to be about sales and marketing and haggling and negotiating.
How can good relationships and happy people exist in that cultural matrix?

Isnt it possible to just connect? Not worry about what women and men are supposed to do, forget the games and the power plays? Just be people that are confident to take their own lives into their hands. Be people first before everything else. Follow the heart and go with the chemistry. The only way to get to know a person properly is to interact with them. If the interaction doesnt go well than the only thing you know for sure is that now you know for sure. Wasted opportunities and regrets are a lot more annoying than feeling a bit embarassed and have your pride momentarily thwarted, and really, it doesnt even have to be embarassing if people choose not to see it in that way.

Ideally gender shouldn't even be an issue here, and it only is because it has been constructed and manufactured that way.

And I really do think that the positions of the planets Mars and Venus in an individual's birth astrological chart have a lot to do with how he/she approaches friendship and sex.
 
The more I read this thread, the more I think everyone is just in fucked up relationships or have had a lot of fucked up experiences and that is colouring their perceptions of who should and should not pursue and whether or not they themselves would be the pursuer.

Perhaps you just described the human race.
 
Perhaps you just described the human race.

It's too bad. I've been there, so I know what it's like. But I found that by eliminating expectations and just following my intuition I've landed myself a relationship that most people would die for. So... I don't know. When we try to abide by social expectations instead of pursuing what we know to be right for us it just screws everything up.
 
It's too bad. I've been there, so I know what it's like. But I found that by eliminating expectations and just following my intuition I've landed myself a relationship that most people would die for. So... I don't know. When we try to abide by social expectations instead of pursuing what we know to be right for us it just screws everything up.

I understand your point. I feel as if I have few expectations. I also feel as if I could live never knowing love, I could die never caring that I did not find it. Its odd but im not entirely sure at what point in my life I decided I needed love in a relationship. For someone who professes to have fewer obvious feeligs than most, there are still things I am confused about concerning myself.
Such is life.
 
I understand your point. I feel as if I have few expectations. I also feel as if I could live never knowing love, I could die never caring that I did not find it. Its odd but im not entirely sure at what point in my life I decided I needed love in a relationship. For someone who professes to have fewer obvious feeligs than most, there are still things I am confused about concerning myself.
Such is life.

I understand what you mean. I never thought I was actually capable of truly loving someone. I think because I put expectations on the feeling of love, not what it actually was. Now that I experience it my understanding of love and connection is VERY different. It is much different than I ever thought it would be looking from the outside in.

Love is actually quite practical and pragmatic which was the biggest surprise. There's not really anything flowery about it. It's like a warm cup of delicious soup or a nice coffee lol. It's familiarity and warmth and security and assurance. It's the absolute furthest thing away from infatuation.

Who would have thought.
 
Perhaps it is because I am older and I've been through a lot of life experiences but it seems to me that these discussions about how men and women are and are not and how they 'should be' is kind of lame (or perhaps more sad). I think if everyone could just love themselves and respect themselves and each other and not worry so much about playing the 'game' or needing somebody else to make you feel attractive or 'worthy' then we would all be much happier. This playing of roles that seems to be happening is not helping anybody. If we weren't all so afraid to show our true selves then I bet we would actually like each other more and not be as afraid to take a chance with someone.

I reject any idea that men and women are or should be any particular way as a whole. We are all individual people and we should be whatever we want to be as well as treat each other with respect. We need to see and accept each other for the individual human beings that we are and the biggest obstacle for that is our own self-imposed masks and fears of being judged or rejected.
 
It is obvious that men are not equal to women in this regard, Women are privileged.
I wonder what other ways they are privileged.

I can think of a few but one that has already been touched upon on the forum in another thread was that far more government spending goes on womens health issues than mens; we're not talking about minor issues either but life or death stuff

basically men are seen as more expendable by society
 
Perhaps it is because I am older and I've been through a lot of life experiences but it seems to me that these discussions about how men and women are and are not and how they 'should be' is kind of lame (or perhaps more sad). I think if everyone could just love themselves and respect themselves and each other and not worry so much about playing the 'game' or needing somebody else to make you feel attractive or 'worthy' then we would all be much happier. This playing of roles that seems to be happening is not helping anybody. If we weren't all so afraid to show our true selves then I bet we would actually like each other more and not be as afraid to take a chance with someone.

I reject any idea that men and women are or should be any particular way as a whole. We are all individual people and we should be whatever we want to be as well as treat each other with respect. We need to see and accept each other for the individual human beings that we are and the biggest obstacle for that is our own self-imposed masks and fears of being judged or rejected.

Ok i'll be expecting you to speak out against marxist feminism then and i'll also expect you to criticise how more government spending goes on womens health than mens.....you know...cos equality and all....cos equality doesn't just go one way
 
Ok i'll be expecting you to speak out against marxist feminism then and i'll also expect you to criticise how more government spending goes on womens health than mens.....you know...cos equality and all....cos equality doesn't just go one way

I speak out against anything that is discriminatory to anyone. I have been very vocal around here because for some reason the test for prostate cancer is not covered in my province but tests for other cancers are. I don't get it and I think it is shameful, but what I really don't get is why I'm not hearing men complaining about it. I'm the one telling the men that I know that they should be complaining about it and writing to their government representatives to change that.
 
What do you mean by oppressed?

I think many people all around the world have been oppressed for a long time, and still are. In many societies, there was an aristocratic class, and then those classes that served them. For a long chunk of modern and ancient history, some people were seen as inherently inferior to other people. And women were seen as inferior to men. Many of the men were seen as chattel and property. And women were seen as chattel and property in many parts of the world. Many people around the world were not allowed to vote, contribute to government, own land, inherit land, or have access to education. Many women were not allowed to vote, contribute to government, own land, inherit, or have access to education. Women and men in many parts of the world had no recourse against things like harassment, rape, and violence. Many people were not allowed to live free and find their own way, but were forced to serve the system that they had been born into...were owned by.
These cultures do not reflect the inherent state of humanity, but what happens when we live in a society where some people believe that they are inherently superior to other people, and other people believe that they are probably inherently inferior to the people that have subjugated them. This is what happens when people are enculturalised to believe that power comes from fear, taking and separating, rather than understanding and cooperating.

Currently, there are still people that believe men and women are not equal. That men and women are 'opposites', have conflicting agendas, and that relationships between men and women will be fraught with inevitable power plays, and that relationships are where two people collaborate, yet compete with each other simultaneously.
Some people believe that people are basically animals that are controlled by their survival instincts. Some people believe that humans are inherently evil or flawed. Some people believe that the world will never be a better place, and will only get worse. Some people believe that life itself is pointless, yet will desperately and robotically continue to survive until they die. Some people believe that they have no power or personal responsibility. Some people believe that they are worthless. Some people believe everything that their aristocracy tells them. Some people never question why things are done, and if they can be done differently. Some people will loyally defend the hand that feed them and beats them , because that is all they know. Some people only want to hear what they already think. Some people have a desperate need to be superior. Some people always think they are inferior. Some people are afraid, afraid to die, afraid to live, afraid of life, of other people, and the world itself.

People...because we form our reality from the inside out...will be attracted to cultural beliefs that are similar to their own inner state. Just because a lot of people hold a certain view doesn't mean the view is correct, inherent, natural, healthy, or effective. People and ideas are popular not because they are correct or make sense, but because they appeal to other people that hold similar views. Popular does not equate to right. Most of the time, especially in an unhealthy society where many people are sick and miserable, popular equates to unhealthy.

There are many things we continuously take for granted, that are not necessarily 'real' or permanant states. We talk about concepts like 'men' and 'women', and 'relationships', but what do we really mean when we say these things?
Is there a typical man, woman, or relationship? Would it be an approximation we could come to by averaging it out? The mean, mode, or median perhaps?
We talk about these concepts as if they are real permanent things, but most of our ideas are based on changing data and perceptions.

I think that currently, many of our cultures and societies are unhealthy. And that many people are unhealthy. And that many relationships are unhealthy.
Many people cannot tell the difference between Love and fear. And many people believe that answers and reality come from external sources, rather than the internal source. Many people do not trust themselves, their mind...their spirit, their life.

Can men and women put their humanity before their sexual organs? I believe that they most certainly can, and would do, if they were not so caught up in patterns of fear and cultural conditioning.

It is hard to say 'what women want' or 'what men want'. Its hard to know what other people want. It is easier and much more practical to work out what i want for myself, on a personal level. Know what you want, and why.

I certainly do not pretend to speak for all women, I speak only for myself.
I dont think that my personal beliefs and views are shared by many other women. In fact, I know that many women, and many men disagree with my beliefs and views.
I say this from the bottom of my heart, I am literally in love with the majority of the women on this forum. Truly. I have never before encountered so many women that I relate to, that I feel I can connect to, understand, and sincerely learn from. They have made me fall in love with myself and the state of being a 'woman'.

But generally speaking, I don't know that many women that I think are similar to me, or that I relate to on a life level.

My personal and humble opinion is that the given 'approacher' in a society is likely to be more empowered.
I dont know if men would really like to live in a society that was reversed, where women did the majority of the approaching.
In my opinion, an evolved society would treat 'approaching' as a non issue, and both sexes would feel comfortable to communicate and connect without fear.

When I was younger, I went out to 'town' a lot with my friends from several difference circles. We would go to bars, night clubs, concerts, cultural events etc. My objective when going out was simply experience. I am curious and like to meet people and see places, do fun and weird intersting things. I made a lot of friends during this time, and very occasionally, had sexual dalliances. Some of my friends had other objectives, and they would get dressed up to the nines and literally be out to scope out guys for flirting and relationships. I cant adequately describe how it feels to be in a group of girls and have a group of guys trying to pick them up. My best friend is a real traffic stopping beauty, and she was one of the worst flirts I have ever encountered (isn't like that any more). It was my self appointed job on some nights to ensure she and other girls would get home safely. I would watch in morbid fascination and horror while she and others would stand there in subtle obvious poses and wait to get noticed. She would get increasingly agitated, sad, and bitchy if she wasn't approached, and assumed she hadnt worn the right dress or something. There would be girls in the same painful to watch position all around the room. Or otherwise, she would give a coy smile, and a guy or guys would approach. They would immediately engage in brain numbing want to throw myself of a cliff in boredom dull saccharine cheesy flirty small talk and...bragging...i drive this car, I bought this gadget, I work out everyday.....The guy would offer to buy drinks. Sometimes they bought drinks for the whole group. She would let them buy her drink after drink, flirt painfully, and then...one of the following things would likely occur:
-they would flirt, she would get increasingly drunk and clumsy, sometimes sick and throwing up, and I would drag her away before anyone could advance on her.
-they would make increasingly sexual advances that she would fend off. They would get very annoyed, because they had just wasted time, money, and effort (wasted their night, some said) trying to ply a girl that they had thought had been a 'sure thing' with alcohol.
Some people see buying a drink as buying sexual favours, and in some cases and social circles...that is true. (And some go straight for for the kill and spike drinks)
- she would reciprocate the sexual advances and they would stay together that night, she would try to maintain his attention while glaring at other attractive girls near by. They would kiss goodnight, and then she would wait the next day, hoping he called her.
- -she would reciprocate the sexual advances and would leave with the guy. Occasionally, I would hear from her later, and she would ask us to find her because the guy had left, or she was other wise stranded and lonely. Other times i heard from her the next day, and she would wait anxiously for him to call her. And get very upset if he didnt.

Obviously all pubs, clubs, and women and men are not like this. Many are not. But I have seen my fair share of this sleazy scene. Women all dressed up trying to attract attention, trying to stand out to compete with their 'competition'. Men walking around strutting like bloody peacocks and bison lol trying to appear cool and suave and dominant. Walk into the women's bathroom, find someone throwing up in the toilet, some girl crying with girls standing around saying something like' he's not worth it', a couple having sex in the disabled toilet, a line of women repairing their makeup in the mirror hogging the sink space while I wait to wash my hands.

There is one particular night I remember vividly because it was the last one I had with particular friends. That sleazy scene had played out to the very extreme. One of my friends had been throwing up and another had her date leave with another girl. A fight had broken out with some guys, and some girl purposefully threw her drink over another girl's dress. I was bored shitless and disgusted by the sorry state of humanity I had witnessed...just wanted to go home so I could relax and finally enjoy my night with a shower and a cup of tea. The sick one was cold, because she had obviously dressed without first consulting her common sense and the weather report, lol unlike some other people. I had to give her my beloved cardigan to wear because her vagina was clearly freezing and my other friend was limping around like a hobbled horse in her shoes invented by some arsehole that hated feet and did not understand the nature of walking. We were waiting at the taxi rank, when lo and behold the friends of the guy that had abandoned his date with my friend appear. I had known them from school. They made pointless and annoying small talk, I complained about how stupid the nightclub was and how I was never going there again, and my friend tried to put on a brave whimpering face, and I realised that there was spew on my cardigan. Then one of them says ( and i am entirely serious here, there is no exaggeration) 'you know charlene, if you started wearing some nicer clothes, straightened you hair, got some high heels and did your make up, I think you'd would be hot and better guys would like you than your gay up himself boyfriend'. I was lost for words....snorted...and just stared at him in my best evil glare until he pissed off. And then I could only laugh...the places and things we do for the sake of our friends sometimes.

I think the way things are sometimes...it has the vibe of a meat market. In some contexts, the women are the goods, and the men are the shoppers. What would you rather, be the chooser, or the chosen? Be proactive and go forward to what you want, or stand back and wait and hope for the best. Waiting sounds crap...i dont really understand why someone would wait and see, if they could just get up and know for sure.
Who gets more choice in this context? And within that system, what about women that arent attractive? And men that are shy?
If it was reversed, it would be just as ugly and hideous and stupid as it is now.

Connecting with people doesn't have to be about sales and marketing and haggling and negotiating.
How can good relationships and happy people exist in that cultural matrix?

Isnt it possible to just connect? Not worry about what women and men are supposed to do, forget the games and the power plays? Just be people that are confident to take their own lives into their hands. Be people first before everything else. Follow the heart and go with the chemistry. The only way to get to know a person properly is to interact with them. If the interaction doesnt go well than the only thing you know for sure is that now you know for sure. Wasted opportunities and regrets are a lot more annoying than feeling a bit embarassed and have your pride momentarily thwarted, and really, it doesnt even have to be embarassing if people choose not to see it in that way.

Ideally gender shouldn't even be an issue here, and it only is because it has been constructed and manufactured that way.

And I really do think that the positions of the planets Mars and Venus in an individual's birth astrological chart have a lot to do with how he/she approaches friendship and sex.

Yeah i've done my fair share of the nightclub scene and witnessed all the scenes you've outlined

It does seem to be the case with the breakdown of community that people are now very disconnected and many people in western countries seem to have to get drunk before they are comfortable approaching strangers

That was certainly an interesting aspect of the ecstacy scene that the invisible barrier with strangers broke down and you'd find yourself talking with the most random people and totally tuning in on the same level...unfortunately it was artificially induced and however real it felt at the time it wore off and the defences would come back up again

There is a gap in our society for a healthy community based gathering of some sort where people can come together in a relaxed way and meet

Pubs and clubs are fulfilling that purpose but it all fuelled with alcohol which is one of the most degraded drugs on the planet!

Concerning concepts of male and female...i think some things are cultural creations but some are simply biological; neuroscience is telling us that men and women are fundamentally different

I really don;t see that as a bad thing as long as the appreciation is always there. If the universal man and the universal woman connect through all the cultural bullshit i think its a beautiful thing

men and women are different and i don't think that needs to be a bad thing as long as the respect and appreciation is there

The problem has come though that certain people (marxists) who have an agenda of destroying capitalist society through covert means want to breakdown the nuclear family as they perceived this to be the basic building block of capitalist society (they want children to be raised by the state!). To achieve this they are trying to create antagonism between men and women and the marxist feminists are stoking the fires

Some people say that there are feminist extremists who take things too far but they fail to realise that it is happening through design!

The aim is to make women disrespect and compete with men and i feel that part of how they are doing that is by encouraging women to be like men by telling women that they are exactly the same as men; the scientific evidence says otherwise so we are seeing one gender going off the rails and it is throwing off the entire dynamic

Men too are coming under attack from these forces who are trying to feminise men and we are seeing the 'metrosexual' appear in greater numbers and men wearing makeup and so on; there is also gender bending chemicals (PCB's) being put into babies plastic bottles and into the water supply through various plastics and these chemicals are lowering male sperm counts and literally hormonally changing the male of the species

Anyway, we are dfferent and we should celebrate that...diversity is strength and variety is the spice of life.
 
I speak out against anything that is discriminatory to anyone. I have been very vocal around here because for some reason the test for prostate cancer is not covered in my province but tests for other cancers are. I don't get it and I think it is shameful, but what I really don't get is why I'm not hearing men complaining about it. I'm the one telling the men that I know that they should be complaining about it and writing to their government representatives to change that.

The reasons are all discussed in the warren farrel talk!

men have been raised to see themselves as more expendable

Polls of men and women have shown that BOTH sexes think the death of a woman is worse than the death of a man

What this means is that men are perceived to have less value than women

Society farrel tells us has invested in the concept that men are less valuable than women because it has benefitted from men taking more risks through being fire fighters, soldiers, police, construction workers etc etc

But there is a cost here which is the self esteem of men. That has not been an issue until now because men and women were seperated in terms of their societal roles

But the game has changed now and women are now taking on the same societal role as men (working) but men are still expected to be more expendable

As men are pushed aside i think it leaves many feeling under valued

We see a raft of TV programmes of high powered career women eg ally mcbeal or sex and the city where the women are financially successful and are looking for a strong man but can't find one that is more successful than themeselves (women still want a strong man)

So as women climb the materialism tree they are placing higher and higher demands on men who are i think feeling more and more dispondant in a world that supports 'soft skills' rather than 'hard' skills; for example i heard in another online discussion that on dating sites there are only a fraction of the number of women than there are males and that the women all place lots of conditions ie ''if you don't have x, y or z (eg house, car etc) then don't even bother calling me!''

The bar has raised for men but their opportunities for improvement have gone down because now the job market is saturated with women and cheap foreign labour as well as men not to mention the encroachment of machines

I think farrell is right...the slow crisis that is creeping up on our society that many people haven't noticed yet is that of our young men

As farrel (and that female commentator that broken daniel posted) says men range from genius when they are positively nourished and encouraged to murderer and rapist at the other end of the spectrum whislt women tend to cluster around the median

What this means is that men often form the most constructive force in society if nourished but equally they often form the most destructive force in society when not nourished

The point i'm making is that we all as a society have something invested in making sure our young men are ok otherwise we are storing up problems...and i think we ARE storing up problems

There are issues over womens rights in other countries/cultures and they have their evolution to go through just as we have but we in the west interfere too much in the business of others when we should be taking a look at ourselves; our media demonises other countries and cultures and yet poverty is rife within our own borders and large numbers of the population are on anti-depressants...seriously who are we to judge anyone?

So i think 'feminism' needs to calm down a bit now in the west because if you compare women and mens pay for men and women who have not married or had kids women actually earn MORE! Also if you want to know the future then go into any university and have a peak into the door of the lecture halls and notice how many more women there are than men proportionately

The problem these days is not for women who in a soft skill economy are frankly advantaged the problem these days is for young men and i think we'd be stupid to ignore it
 
Back
Top